Timeline for Cross-language constants
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2021 at 10:11 | comment | added | Natan Yellin | I wrote a Python tool called Reconstant to solve this exact problem. | |
| S Sep 17, 2014 at 1:48 | history | bounty ended | Phrancis | ||
| S Sep 17, 2014 at 1:48 | history | notice removed | Phrancis | ||
| Sep 10, 2014 at 21:33 | comment | added | konijn | Gotcha! Thanks for shedding light on this. | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | konijn | (assume Oracle because of PHP/SQL) What is the value of including xml and xlst in the mix, why not just use PHP and the Oracle Database on backend, JS in front-end. This would solve most of your worries. | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 6:24 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 101 characters in body
|
| Sep 10, 2014 at 6:16 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 101 characters in body
|
| S Sep 10, 2014 at 6:09 | history | bounty started | Phrancis | ||
| S Sep 10, 2014 at 6:09 | history | notice added | Phrancis | Canonical answer required | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 6:07 | history | edited | Phrancis |
Replaced tag plpgsql with postgresql as there does not seem to be much implementation of PL
|
|
| S Jun 18, 2013 at 21:27 | history | suggested | user272735 |
This is not Oracle PL/SQL question but PostgreSQL PL/pgSQL question.
|
|
| Jun 18, 2013 at 5:51 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 18, 2013 at 21:27 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2013 at 2:04 | vote | accept | Dave Jarvis | ||
| Dec 27, 2012 at 20:58 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 829 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2012 at 17:13 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1347 characters in body
|
| Dec 27, 2012 at 16:47 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/284339737672699905 | ||
| Dec 27, 2012 at 14:44 | answer | added | mseancole | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 27, 2012 at 0:43 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 23:45 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 23:15 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 146 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 22:12 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1700 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 22:05 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1700 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:57 | comment | added | mseancole | This is a very interesting dilemma. But you should know that this is code review and code to review is required by the FAQ, even if that code is just a sample or invented on the spot (as long as it works). Besides, I'm having a difficult time trying to figure out exactly what you are talking about. If you could provide an example in each case that would help immensely. | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:54 | comment | added | Dave Jarvis | There's nothing wrong with putting everything in the table. I'm wondering what other approaches are possible -- perhaps using a table to generate constants for different programming languages is not ideal? | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:19 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 26, 2012 at 22:56 | |||||
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:14 | comment | added | Florian Margaine | What's wrong with putting everything in this table? Each language doesn't have to use all of it. | |
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:08 | history | edited | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 77 characters in body
|
| Dec 26, 2012 at 21:03 | history | asked | Dave Jarvis | CC BY-SA 3.0 |