arXiv is now an independent nonprofit! Learn more
License: arXiv.org perpetual non-exclusive license
arXiv:2607.17815v1 [astro-ph.GA] 20 Jul 2026
11institutetext: 1Main Astronomical Observatory of the NAS of Ukraine, 27, Akademik Zabolotny St., Kyiv, 03143, Ukraine
2International Centre for Astronomical, Medical and Ecological Research, 27, Akademik Zabolotny St., Kyiv, 03143, Ukraine

Revealing a multi-zone circumnuclear dust response in UGC 11487 through phase-resolved WISE W1–W2 diagnostics

Izviekova I.O.1,2    Kompaniiets O.V.1    Vavilova I.B.1
(Received … July 2026; accepted … 2026)
Abstract

Context. Mid-infrared (MIR) flares trace dust reprocessing in obscured tidal disruption event (TDE) candidates, especially when the primary optical or ultraviolet flare is weak, missed, or strongly obscured.

Aims. We investigate the phase-dependent W1W1W2W2 evolution of the MIR-selected TDE candidate UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka and test whether its infrared behaviour can be described by a single self-similar MIR response or requires a structured circumnuclear dust response.

Methods. For the first time, we performed a phase-resolved analysis of the WISE/NEOWISE W1–W2 evolution of UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka over 2014–2024. We combined empirical W1W1W2W2 timing, colour, and flux diagnostics with phenomenological modelling and hydrodynamically motivated clumpy dust-echo calculations. We also constructed an aperture-matched ultraviolet-to-radio spectral energy distribution of the host galaxy.

Results. UGC 11487 exhibits a decade-long MIR flare characterised by a delayed and broader W2W2 response, colour hysteresis, and systematic cooling from 900\sim 900 K to 500\sim 500–600 K. Model-independent positive-fluence centroids give a preferred delay of Δtcent=224±45\Delta t_{\rm cent}=224\pm 45 d, corresponding to 0.188±0.0380.188\pm 0.038 pc. The effective infrared luminosity reaches 3×1043\sim 3\times 10^{43} erg s-1, and the integrated IR energy is (2.9(2.93.8)×10513.8)\times 10^{51} erg. A single-component phenomenological description is strongly disfavoured (ΔBIC=281.7\Delta{\rm BIC}=281.7), while the preferred compact description is a two-component phenomenological model. Representative hydro-clumpy models reproduce the empirical diagnostics within a structured multi-zone dust-response scenario. The host is a moderately star-forming isolated barred disc with no dominant persistent AGN component.

Conclusions. The MIR evolution supports an obscured TDE-like accretion transient reprocessed by structured circumnuclear dust. Phase-resolved WISE W1W1W2W2 diagnostics recover characteristic sub-parsec response scales and provide constraints on dust reprocessing in obscured accretion-powered nuclear transients.

Key Words.:
galaxies: individual: UGC 11487 – galaxies: nuclei – galaxies: active – infrared: galaxies – transients: tidal disruption events – dust, extinction

1 Introduction

Tidal disruption events (TDEs) are nuclear transients powered by the disruption and subsequent accretion of stellar debris by a massive black hole (Hills, 1975; Rees, 1988; Gezari, 2021). They offer a direct way to study short-lived accretion episodes and the response of gas and dust in galactic nuclei. The observed emission can arise from physically distinct regions, ranging from the inner accretion flow, traced by X-ray and ultraviolet (UV) radiation, to the surrounding circumnuclear medium, traced by optical, infrared (IR), and radio emission (Gezari, 2021; van Velzen et al., 2021).

Optical and soft X-ray surveys have historically dominated TDE discovery, but these bands are strongly affected by obscuration, viewing angle, and reprocessing geometry. Dust-obscured or IR-selected TDE-like events may therefore be missed by optical and X-ray searches (Masterson et al., 2024; Yao et al., 2025). In such systems, a substantial fraction of the primary UV/optical luminosity can be absorbed by circumnuclear dust and re-emitted at mid-infrared (MIR) wavelengths. The MIR dust echo can therefore provide a partial measure of the energy released by a hidden nuclear flare, although the inferred energy and scale depend on the dust sublimation radius, radial distribution, geometry, and covering factor (Lu et al., 2016; van Velzen et al., 2021).

MIR echoes detected in optically selected TDEs have shown that WISE W1 and W2 variability can constrain the effective dust temperature, luminosity, covering factor, and emitting scale (van Velzen et al., 2016; Jiang et al., 2016, 2021). Long-lived MIR declines have also been found in transient coronal-line emitters, non-Seyfert galaxies, and dusty nuclear transients, supporting the interpretation that some nuclear MIR flares are delayed dust echoes of energetic accretion events (Dou et al., 2016; Wang et al., 2018; Reynolds et al., 2022). Large-amplitude MIR flares without optical counterparts can also arise from obscured TDE-like events, turning-on AGN, or other nuclear accretion transients, which makes additional MIR diagnostics essential for interpreting their physical origin (Yang et al., 2019).

Independent evidence from time-series spectropolarimetry of the nearby nuclear transient AT2023clx further illustrates that TDE-like events can probe pre-existing dusty structures in galactic nuclei, including the possible geometrical connection between a transient outflow and the nuclear dusty region (Uno et al., 2025). Recent IR studies have also shown that the infrared response of TDEs can include viewing-angle effects, non-dust reprocessing at early times, and clumpy or extended dust structures at later times, so a single simple dust shell is not always an adequate description (Reynolds et al., 2026; Wu et al., 2025). In this context, hydrodynamical TDE fallback-rate libraries can provide physically motivated input light curves for consistency tests, while dust-echo calculations show that the observed MIR response depends on the dust geometry, temperature structure, covering factor, and light-travel-time delays (Law-Smith et al., 2020a; Lu et al., 2016).

The WISE mission and its NEOWISE reactivation phase have provided long-term W1 and W2 light curves, enabling systematic searches for nuclear transients at MIR wavelengths (Wright et al., 2010; Mainzer et al., 2014). These searches have revealed MIR-selected TDE candidates and larger samples of dust-echo-like infrared flares, especially among obscured or optically weak events, in which the primary flare is hidden, poorly sampled, or missed entirely (Masterson et al., 2024; Necker et al., 2025). The relative evolution of W1W1 and W2W2 provides additional constraints beyond the light-curve shape: colour changes, flux–flux behaviour, and internal W2W2W1W1 timing can quantify the degree of phase-dependent complexity in the MIR response and search for evidence of a structured dust response (Yao et al., 2025).

The host-galaxy environment is an important factor in interpreting nuclear activity. Isolated galaxies provide a low-interaction environment in which recent external perturbations are reduced relative to galaxies in pairs, groups, or denser large-scale environments. Previous studies have investigated the morphology and isolation properties of such systems (Vavilova et al., 2009; Karachentseva et al., 2010). Isolated AGNs selected from the 2MIG catalogue have been shown to exhibit diverse nuclear and host-galaxy properties while evolving in low-interaction environments (Pulatova et al., 2015, 2023; Kompaniiets, 2023; Kompaniiets et al., 2026; Izviekova et al., 2026). This environmental context makes UGC 11487 a relevant target for studying a MIR-selected TDE-like nuclear flare in an isolated barred galaxy.

UGC 11487, also known as WTP14adeqka, was identified by the WISE Transient Pipeline as a MIR-selected TDE candidate (Masterson et al., 2024) and is included among the brightest dust-echo-like infrared flares in the Flaires catalogue (Necker et al., 2025). It was subsequently followed up at radio wavelengths, where delayed radio emission and a resolved sub-parsec outflow were reported (Golay et al., 2025). Together, the MIR and radio observations provide complementary probes of the compact nuclear environment, with WISE tracing thermal dust reprocessing and the radio emission tracing synchrotron-emitting plasma associated with an outflow or shock. However, the internal W1–W2 evolution, the phase-dependent MIR behaviour, and their connection to the compact radio-emitting region have not yet been analysed in detail.

Because the available optical coverage does not densely sample the primary flare, a classical optical–MIR reverberation measurement is not possible. We found no corresponding optical transient in ASAS-SN or ATLAS (Kochanek et al., 2017; Tonry et al., 2018); this non-detection is not strongly constraining, because the optical counterpart could have been faint, obscured, or below the effective depth of these wide-field surveys. The absence of a well-sampled optical driver motivates an analysis based on the internal WISE W1–W2 evolution.

The aim of this work is to characterise the MIR evolution of UGC 11487 and to test whether phase-resolved W1–W2 diagnostics can reveal a structured multi-zone circumnuclear dust response in an obscured nuclear transient. We combine empirical timing diagnostics, phenomenological decomposition, and physically motivated hydro-clumpy dust models to investigate the delayed W2 emission and compare the resulting MIR scales with independent radio constraints.

The paper is organised as follows. Section 2 describes the WISE/NEOWISE data, ancillary optical information, and the published radio constraints. Section 3 presents the light-curve preparation, empirical W1W1W2W2 diagnostics, effective colour-blackbody analysis, and phenomenological and hydro-clumpy modelling. Section 4 summarises the MIR timing, colour, energetics, and model-comparison results. Section 5 discusses the interpretation of UGC 11487 as a structured dust response to an obscured TDE-like nuclear flare and compares the MIR-derived scales with the radio-emitting region. The main conclusions are given in Section 6. Appendices AG provide the technical definitions, model details, auxiliary checks, robustness tests, and supplementary host-galaxy SED analysis.

2 Target, observational data, and external constraints

UGC 11487 hosts the nuclear MIR transient WTP14adeqka, which was identified as a MIR-selected TDE candidate by the WISE Transient Pipeline (Masterson et al., 2024). It is also listed among the brightest dust-echo-like IR flares in the Flaires catalogue (Necker et al., 2025). The adopted MIR position of WTP14adeqka is αJ2000=19h49m24.s86\alpha_{\rm J2000}=19^{\rm h}49^{\rm m}24\aas@@fstack{s}86 and δJ2000=+633033.4\delta_{\rm J2000}=+63^{\circ}30^{\prime}33\aas@@fstack{\prime\prime}4. The main properties of the target and the external constraints used in this work are summarised in Table 1.

Independent radio observations from Golay et al. (2025) provide external constraints on the compact nuclear environment. We use the published radio luminosity, kinetic energy, VLBA-resolved size, and size-increase velocity only as reference quantities for comparison with the MIR-derived dust-response scales. Together, the WISE and radio datasets allow us to compare the characteristic scales of thermal dust reprocessing and compact radio emission in the nucleus of UGC 11487.

The main dataset used in this work is the WISE/NEOWISE time-domain photometry in W1 and W2, centred at 3.4 and 4.6 μm\mu{\rm m}, respectively (Wright et al., 2010; Mainzer et al., 2014). These data are used to trace the MIR evolution of the flare, measure the internal W1W1W2W2 timing and colour evolution, and assess the phase dependence and characteristic complexity of the MIR dust response.

We also use ZTF grigri photometry as ancillary optical data (Bellm et al., 2019). Since these observations do not cover the primary MIR rise and peak, they are used only to check for optical variability during the MIR decline. The auxiliary ZTF colour and flux–flux checks are summarised in Appendix C.

We further use archival multiwavelength photometry to construct an aperture-matched integrated host-galaxy SED of UGC 11487. This SED is used to characterise the time-averaged stellar, star-forming, and dust content of the host galaxy. The aperture photometry and SED-modelling procedure are described in Sect. 3.6.

Table 1: Literature parameters of UGC 11487 / WTP14adeqka and external constraints used in this work.111References: [1] Golay et al. (2025); [2] Pulatova et al. (2015); [3] Masterson et al. (2024); [4] Necker et al. (2025); [5] NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED). The quoted VLBA size corresponds to the major-axis scale of the single elliptical Gaussian model fitted by Golay et al. (2025) and is used throughout this work as a characteristic scale of the radio-emitting region. The quoted velocity is the VLBA size-increase velocity reported by Golay et al. (2025); it is distinct from mean equipartition expansion velocities that depend on the assumed launch epoch.
Quantity Value Ref.
Redshift zz 0.018950 [5]
Luminosity distance DLD_{\rm L} 82.34 Mpc [5]
Environment Isolated barred galaxy [2]
Transient class MIR-selected [3]
TDE cand.
Flaires class Bright dust-echo-like [4]
IR flare
log(MSMBH/M)\log(M_{\rm SMBH}/M_{\odot}) 6.8±0.56.8\pm 0.5 [3]
Rdust,shellR_{\rm dust,shell} 0.330.05+0.130.33^{+0.13}_{-0.05} pc [3]
Peak radio νLν\nu L_{\nu} 2×1039\simeq 2\times 10^{39} erg s-1 [1]
EK,radioE_{\rm K,radio} 1050.7\simeq 10^{50.7} erg [1]
VLBA major-axis Gaussian size 0.110.13\sim 0.11{-}0.13 pc [1]
VLBA size-increase velocity 0.05c\sim 0.05c [1]

3 Methods

3.1 WISE/NEOWISE photometry and baseline

We analysed epoch-averaged WISE/NEOWISE W1W1 and W2W2 photometry of UGC 11487 from 2014 to 2024. To constrain the pre-flare MIR level, we also queried the AllWISE multi-epoch photometry table (allwise_p3as_mep), which provides two 2010 W1/W2W1/W2 epoch-averaged measurements. Together with the first pre-rise NEOWISE epochs, these data define the quiescent MIR baseline adopted for the baseline-subtracted excess light curves.

Single-exposure NEOWISE measurements were retained when both W1W1 and W2W2 had valid photometry, S/N(W1)>5S/N(W1)>5, S/N(W2)>3S/N(W2)>3, cc_flags=00\texttt{cc\_flags}=00, and qual_frame>0\texttt{qual\_frame}>0. The cleaned measurements were grouped according to the natural NEOWISE cadence. The retained NEOWISE measurements have stable PSF-fit diagnostics, w1fitr=w2fitr=7.5\texttt{w1fitr}=\texttt{w2fitr}=7.5\arcsec, and no saturation flags, w1sat=w2sat=0\texttt{w1sat}=\texttt{w2sat}=0.

The fiducial pre-flare baseline was defined as the median flux density of the two 2010 AllWISE epochs and the first two pre-rise NEOWISE epochs, yielding FW1,base=8.453mJyF_{W1,{\rm base}}=8.453\penalty 10000\ {\rm mJy} and FW2,base=5.428mJyF_{W2,{\rm base}}=5.428\penalty 10000\ {\rm mJy}. The adopted baseline combines the earliest AllWISE and pre-rise NEOWISE measurements to reduce sensitivity to possible low-level variability and to provide a robust estimate of the quiescent MIR emission. The 2010 points were used only to define the baseline and were excluded from the flare fluence and energy integration.

WISE Vega magnitudes were converted to flux densities as

Fν=F0 100.4m,F_{\nu}=F_{0}\,10^{-0.4m}, (1)

using F0,W1=309.54JyF_{0,W1}=309.54\penalty 10000\ {\rm Jy} and F0,W2=171.787JyF_{0,W2}=171.787\penalty 10000\ {\rm Jy}. The baseline-subtracted excess flux density was defined as

ΔFν(t)=Fν(t)Fν,base.\Delta F_{\nu}(t)=F_{\nu}(t)-F_{\nu,{\rm base}}. (2)

All subsequent colour, timing, fluence, and colour-blackbody diagnostics were based on these baseline-subtracted excess light curves.

For model fitting and Monte Carlo resampling, we adopted an effective flux-density uncertainty

σeff=(σFν2+σfloor2)1/2,\sigma_{\rm eff}=\left(\sigma_{F_{\nu}}^{2}+\sigma_{\rm floor}^{2}\right)^{1/2}, (3)

where σFν\sigma_{F_{\nu}} is the formal WISE flux-density uncertainty and σfloor=1.10mJy\sigma_{\rm floor}=1.10\penalty 10000\ {\rm mJy}. This value accounts for residual systematic effects and prevents unrealistically small formal errors from dominating the fits. The uncertainty of the adopted pre-flare baseline was included separately in the Monte Carlo procedure by bootstrap resampling of the baseline epochs and perturbing their fluxes within their formal photometric uncertainties.

Additional robustness tests are provided in Appendix E.

3.2 Empirical W1W1W2W2 diagnostics

To characterise the internal phase-dependent MIR evolution, we used empirical W1W2W1-W2 diagnostics based on colour evolution, colour–magnitude behaviour, flux–flux relations, and model-independent timing measures. This set of diagnostics traces both the spectral and temporal evolution of the MIR flare and quantifies the degree of phase-dependent complexity in the WISE response.

Observed-frame epochs were converted to rest-frame time relative to the first NEOWISE epoch,

trest=tobstref1+z.t_{\rm rest}=\frac{t_{\rm obs}-t_{\rm ref}}{1+z}. (4)

The WISE colour index W1W2W1-W2 and the colour–magnitude relation were used to follow the MIR spectral evolution. The colour–magnitude relation was fitted using the York regression (York et al., 2004), accounting for correlated uncertainties between W1W2W1-W2 and W1W1. Flux–flux fits were performed with orthogonal distance regression for both absolute and baseline-subtracted flux densities.

The rise and decline occupy different loci in the flux–flux plane. For this reason, we fitted these phases separately to quantify potential hysteresis and deviations from a single-component evolution. We applied both a broad rise–decline split and a stricter division into the clean rise, turnover, and post-peak decline phases (Fig. 4).

In the absence of a well-sampled optical or UV driver, classical reverberation mapping cannot be applied. We therefore used internal MIR timing diagnostics based solely on the relative evolution of W1W1 and W2W2. The W2W2W1W1 peak-time offset was defined as

Δtpeak=tpeak(W2)tpeak(W1),\Delta t_{\rm peak}=t_{\rm peak}(W2)-t_{\rm peak}(W1), (5)

and the positive-fluence centroid offset was defined as

Δtcent=tcent(W2)tcent(W1),\Delta t_{\rm cent}=t_{\rm cent}(W2)-t_{\rm cent}(W1), (6)

where

tcent=tmax[ΔF(t),0]𝑑tmax[ΔF(t),0]𝑑t.t_{\rm cent}=\frac{\int t\,\max[\Delta F(t),0]\,dt}{\int\max[\Delta F(t),0]\,dt}. (7)

The corresponding positive MIR fluence in each WISE band was

ΦWj=max[ΔFWj(t),0]𝑑t,j=1,2.\Phi_{Wj}=\int\max[\Delta F_{Wj}(t),0]\,dt,\qquad j=1,2. (8)

The integrals were evaluated numerically from the epoch-averaged light curves using trapezoidal integration. The 2010 AllWISE points were used only to define and resample the pre-flare baseline and were excluded from the flare fluence and energy integrations.

The positive-fluence centroid was adopted as the preferred timing measure because it incorporates the full positive-excess light curve. This reduces the dependence on a single sampled maximum and makes the estimate more robust against the sparse WISE cadence.

The corresponding timing offsets were expressed as cΔtrestc\Delta t_{\rm rest} to place the internal W1W1W2W2 timing difference on an approximate light-travel-distance scale. This quantity represents a characteristic separation between the W1W1- and W2W2-weighted dust responses. It is distinct from an absolute dust radius or an optical–MIR reverberation radius. The sensitivity of the adopted timing diagnostics to the baseline definition is tested in Appendix E.

We also used a shift-and-broaden W1W1-to-W2W2 template test to characterise the shape difference between the two MIR bands. In this test, the W2W2 excess light curve was represented as an amplitude-scaled, time-shifted, and temporally smoothed version of the W1W1 excess light curve,

ΔFW2(t)=A[GsΔFW1](tτ),\Delta F_{W2}(t)=A\,\left[G_{s}\ast\Delta F_{W1}\right](t-\tau), (9)

where AA is an amplitude scale factor, τ\tau is the compact W1W1-to-W2W2 shift, GsG_{s} is a Gaussian smoothing kernel with smoothing timescale ss, and \ast denotes convolution. The fitted shift, τ\tau, describes the compact W1W1-to-W2W2 displacement after allowing for additional smoothing of the W2W2 response, while the smoothing timescale captures the broader temporal width of W2W2. This diagnostic separates the compact W1W1-to-W2W2 displacement from the additional temporal broadening of the W2W2 response. The fit was performed on a grid of τ\tau and ss, with the optimal amplitude obtained by weighted least squares for each grid point.

Uncertainties for the empirical diagnostics in this subsection were estimated through Monte Carlo resampling of the WISE fluxes, including bootstrap resampling of the pre-flare baseline.

Together, the colour, flux–flux, timing, and shift-and-broaden diagnostics probe different aspects of the MIR evolution. They are complemented by effective colour-blackbody quantities, which provide an empirical description of the temperature and emitting-scale evolution of the MIR flare.

3.3 Effective colour-blackbody diagnostics

We estimated effective two-band colour-blackbody quantities from the baseline-subtracted W1W1 and W2W2 excess fluxes, ΔFW=FWFW,base\Delta F_{W}=F_{W}-F_{W,{\rm base}}. These quantities provide empirical diagnostics of the temperature, emitting scale, and luminosity evolution of the MIR flare. They should be interpreted as descriptive thermal parameters of the WISE excess emission.

For epochs with ΔFW1>0\Delta F_{W1}>0 and ΔFW2>0\Delta F_{W2}>0, the effective colour temperature was obtained from the ratio of the W1W1 and W2W2 excess flux densities,

ΔFW1ΔFW2=Bν(νW1,rest,Teff)Bν(νW2,rest,Teff),\frac{\Delta F_{W1}}{\Delta F_{W2}}=\frac{B_{\nu}(\nu_{W1,{\rm rest}},T_{\rm eff})}{B_{\nu}(\nu_{W2,{\rm rest}},T_{\rm eff})}, (10)

where νrest=(1+z)νobs\nu_{\rm rest}=(1+z)\nu_{\rm obs}. After TeffT_{\rm eff} was determined, the effective blackbody radius was estimated from the W1W1 excess flux density,

ΔFν,obs=(1+z)πRBB2Bν(νrest,Teff)DL2.\Delta F_{\nu,{\rm obs}}=\frac{(1+z)\pi R_{\rm BB}^{2}B_{\nu}(\nu_{\rm rest},T_{\rm eff})}{D_{\rm L}^{2}}. (11)

The approximate bolometric IR luminosity was then calculated as

LIR=4πRBB2σSBTeff4,L_{\rm IR}=4\pi R_{\rm BB}^{2}\sigma_{\rm SB}T_{\rm eff}^{4}, (12)

and the integrated effective IR energy as

EIR=LIR(t)𝑑t,E_{\rm IR}=\int L_{\rm IR}(t)\,dt, (13)

with the integration performed over rest-frame time. Uncertainties were evaluated through Monte Carlo resampling of both the WISE fluxes and the pre-flare baseline.

An epoch was classified as reliable if it was not used in the baseline definition, both W1W1 and W2W2 excess fluxes satisfied ΔF/σeff2\Delta F/\sigma_{\rm eff}\geq 2, and the resulting Monte Carlo distributions were sufficiently constrained. Specifically, we required fractional uncertainties below 0.35 for TeffT_{\rm eff} and below 0.75 for both RBBR_{\rm BB} and LIRL_{\rm IR}. Finite colour-blackbody solutions that did not satisfy these criteria were retained separately as poorly constrained estimates.

The derived blackbody radii represent effective emitting scales. They depend on the two-band colour temperature, the adopted baseline, and the assumption of a blackbody-like MIR excess. For this reason, they provide empirical constraints on the thermal evolution of the flare, while the underlying dust geometry remains degenerate.

The effective IR energy was also used for an energetic consistency check. Combining the effective IR energy with the published kinetic-energy scale of the radio-emitting outflow, we estimated the accreted-mass scale as

Macc=EIR/fcov+EK,radioηeffc2,M_{\rm acc}=\frac{E_{\rm IR}/f_{\rm cov}+E_{\rm K,radio}}{\eta_{\rm eff}c^{2}}, (14)

where EK,radioE_{\rm K,radio} is the published kinetic-energy scale of the radio-emitting outflow, fcovf_{\rm cov} is the effective dust reprocessing factor, and ηeff\eta_{\rm eff} is an illustrative radiative efficiency. The corresponding disrupted-stellar mass scale was estimated as

M,scale=Maccfacc,M_{\star,\rm scale}=\frac{M_{\rm acc}}{f_{\rm acc}}, (15)

where faccf_{\rm acc} is the fraction of the disrupted stellar mass that is ultimately accreted. These quantities provide order-of-magnitude energetic consistency estimates and depend on the adopted values of fcovf_{\rm cov}, ηeff\eta_{\rm eff}, and faccf_{\rm acc}.

Together, these effective quantities provide an independent empirical view of the thermal evolution of the MIR-emitting material and serve as a complementary test of the structured dust-response scenario explored below.

3.4 Phenomenological and hydro-clumpy modelling

We employed two complementary levels of modelling. First, phenomenological multi-component models were used to quantify the level of smooth temporal complexity required by the WISE light curves. Second, physically motivated hydro-clumpy dust models driven by hydrodynamical TDE fallback histories were used as physical consistency tests for the empirical diagnostics.

The phenomenological decomposition describes the morphology of the MIR response in a compact parametric form. It provides a way to compare one-, two-, and three-component smooth representations of the W1W1 and W2W2 excess light curves.

We fitted the W1W1 and W2W2 excess light curves simultaneously with one-, two-, and three-component smooth phenomenological models. Each component was represented by a smooth, asymmetric temporal profile, with the amplitudes of W1W1 and W2W2 linked by the temperature-dependent Planck ratio. The component definitions are given in Appendix A.

The models were compared using the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) (Akaike, 1974; Schwarz, 1978). These criteria assess whether additional smooth components improve the description of the two-band WISE data after penalising the increased number of free parameters. The decomposition is used to describe the MIR light-curve morphology and to provide a compact way to quantify the phase-dependent W1W2W1-W2 response.

As a physical consistency test, we also constructed a clumpy dust-echo forward model driven by hydrodynamical TDE fallback curves. The goal of these calculations is to examine whether the empirical WISE diagnostics are compatible with a physically plausible TDE-driven dust response.

Because only two WISE bands are available, substantial degeneracies between the input luminosity history, accretion smoothing, and dust geometry are expected. The input mass-supply histories were taken from the STARS fallback-rate library (Law-Smith et al., 2020a, b), broadened by an effective accretion/circularisation smoothing timescale, and used to illuminate a clumpy, radially stratified dust distribution. The model follows the standard dust-echo interpretation of TDE-powered infrared flares (e.g. Jiang et al., 2016; Lu et al., 2016; van Velzen et al., 2016, 2021) and uses modified-blackbody dust emission (e.g. Draine, 2003).

The hydro-clumpy models were selected using a combined objective function that includes both the W1+W2W1+W2 light-curve residuals and the model-independent WISE diagnostics. The objective function also incorporates quantities such as the W2/W1W2/W1 fluence ratio and centroid timing, which helps connect the forward models to the empirical MIR diagnostics. The detailed objective-function definition and implementation details are given in Appendix B. Additional toy W1W1-to-W2W2 response tests and the Monte Carlo parameters of the preferred two-component phenomenological model are given in Appendix D.

These hydro-clumpy calculations provide physical consistency tests for a structured multi-zone response. The resulting models represent plausible dust-response scenarios that reproduce the observed W1W2W1-W2 evolution within the adopted assumptions.

Thus, the phenomenological and hydro-clumpy approaches serve different purposes. The phenomenological models quantify the temporal complexity required by the WISE data, while the hydro-clumpy models assess whether that complexity can be reproduced within physically plausible TDE-driven dust scenarios.

3.5 Robustness checks

We tested the stability of the W2W1W2-W1 centroid scale against three baseline definitions: pre-rise NEOWISE only, the fiducial AllWISE+NEOWISE baseline, and AllWISE 2010 only. We also tested the dependence of the smooth component comparison on the adopted effective error floor.

The possible late-time W2W2 residual around epochs 17–19, marked in the numbered WISE light curve in Fig. 1, was assessed by comparing those epochs with a smooth post-peak decline fitted after excluding them. This test evaluates the significance of possible deviations from a smooth decline and treats the late-time W2W2 excess as a residual feature whose interpretation remains model-dependent. Details of these tests are given in Appendix E.

3.6 Host-galaxy environment from UV-to-radio SED modelling

To characterise the host-galaxy environment and assess the possible contribution of a persistent AGN component, we constructed an aperture-matched UV-to-radio spectral energy distribution. This analysis provides global host-galaxy properties and constrains the time-averaged non-transient emission.

We used archival data for UGC 11487 from GALEX, Pan-STARRS1, 2MASS, WISE, IRAS, and NVSS. For the photometric measurements, we matched full-galaxy apertures where angular resolution allowed, with separate low-resolution apertures for WISE W3–W4, IRAS, and NVSS. The resulting broadband fluxes were modelled with CIGALE to estimate the time-averaged stellar mass, star formation rate, attenuation, and dust luminosity. Particular attention was paid to the AGN fraction, since the presence of a dominant persistent AGN would complicate the interpretation of the MIR flare. The detailed aperture definitions, masking procedure, photometric conversions, treatment of IRAS upper limits, and validation images are given in Appendix F.

Thus, the host-galaxy SED modelling provides the environmental context for the MIR flare and constrains the contribution of any persistent AGN component, complementing the phase-resolved diagnostics presented above.

4 Results

The main empirical quantities derived from the WISE/NEOWISE analysis are summarised in Table 2. The model-independent W1W1W2W2 timing diagnostics are listed in Table 3, while the effective colour-blackbody quantities are summarised in Table 4. The smooth phenomenological model comparison is given in Table 5. The MIR–radio scale comparison is illustrated in Fig. 8, with the corresponding illustrative travel-time estimates given in Appendix E.

4.1 Phase-dependent WISE morphology and W1W1W2W2 hysteresis

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Epoch-averaged WISE/NEOWISE W1W1 and W2W2 light curves of UGC 11487. The source shows a decade-long MIR flare with a larger peak-to-peak magnitude amplitude in W2W2 than in W1W1. The numbered labels mark the WISE epochs used throughout the analysis.

The epoch-averaged W1W1 and W2W2 light curves of UGC 11487 show a broad, asymmetric MIR flare lasting nearly a decade (Fig. 1). The peak-to-peak magnitude amplitude measured from the epoch-averaged light curves is larger in W2W2, AW22.27A_{W2}\simeq 2.27 mag, than in W1W1, AW11.39A_{W1}\simeq 1.39 mag. The W2W2 excess is also more persistent: integrating the baseline-subtracted positive excess over the flare gives a W2W2-to-W1W1 positive-fluence ratio of 2.23±0.122.23\pm 0.12 (Table 2). These results show chromatic MIR variability with a substantial contribution from cooler dust traced most strongly by W2W2.

The peak of the excess emission occurs first in W1W1 and later in W2W2: the W1W1 excess reaches its maximum at epoch 6, whereas the W2W2 excess peaks at epoch 7 (Fig. 1). The W2W2 light curve also shows a slower decline and remains above the baseline after the W1W1 excess has substantially faded. This morphology already suggests that the MIR evolution is phase dependent and motivates the internal W1W1W2W2 timing analysis presented below.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Baseline-subtracted WISE W1W1 and W2W2 excess light curves of UGC 11487 using the combined AllWISE 2010 plus pre-rise NEOWISE baseline. Vertical dotted lines mark the W1W1 and W2W2 peak epochs, while dashed lines show the positive-fluence centroids. W2W2 peaks later and declines more slowly than W1W1, indicating a broader cooler-dust response.

The WISE W1W2W1-W2 versus W1W1 colour–magnitude relation for UGC 11487 shows a redder-when-brighter (RWB) trend (Fig. 3). The York fit gives a slope of 0.42±0.16-0.42\pm 0.16, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of approximately 0.63-0.63. This trend is consistent with a stronger relative contribution from cooler, W2W2-emitting dust during the brighter MIR phases.

The phase dependence is more apparent in the WISE flux–flux trajectory (Fig. 4). During the rise, the source follows a lower branch in the FW2F_{W2}FW1F_{W1} plane. During the decline, it returns along an upper branch, with larger FW2F_{W2} at a similar FW1F_{W1}. This hysteresis-like trajectory demonstrates that the MIR spectral evolution depends on phase and suggests a delayed and more persistent W2W2-emitting component.

The phase-resolved flux–flux fits quantify this behaviour. For the broad rise–decline division, the rising branch, defined by epochs 0–6, has m=1.51±0.09m=1.51\pm 0.09, whereas the declining branch, defined by epochs 7–21, has m=2.01±0.18m=2.01\pm 0.18. A stricter split excluding the turnover region, epochs 5–8, gives mrise=1.43±0.12m_{\rm rise}=1.43\pm 0.12 for epochs 0–4 and mdecline=2.34±0.06m_{\rm decline}=2.34\pm 0.06 for epochs 9–21. The declining branch is therefore substantially more W2W2-enhanced than the rising branch, quantitatively confirming the phase dependence of the MIR evolution. Together, these empirical diagnostics show that the MIR evolution of UGC 11487 is phase dependent and departs from a self-similar single-component trajectory, motivating the timing analysis presented in Sect. 4.2.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: WISE W1W2W1-W2 versus W1W1 colour–magnitude relation for UGC 11487. The negative York slope indicates redder-when-brighter MIR behaviour, consistent with an increasing relative contribution from cooler W2W2-emitting dust.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: WISE flux–flux trajectory of UGC 11487. Arrows indicate the temporal direction of the MIR evolution. The source follows different paths during the rise and decline: at a similar FW1F_{W1}, the declining branch has a larger FW2F_{W2}. This hysteresis-like trajectory indicates that the cooler W2W2-emitting component remains bright after the hotter W1W1-emitting component has faded.
Table 2: Summary of the empirical MIR properties derived for UGC 11487.
Quantity Value Interpretation
WISE/NEOWISE coverage 22 epoch-averaged points W1/W2W1/W2 MIR light curve, 2014–2024
Pre-flare baseline 2 AllWISE + 2 NEOWISE epochs Combined low-state baseline
MIR event duration 10\sim 10 yr Long-lived nuclear MIR flare
AW1A_{W1} 1.39\simeq 1.39 mag Peak-to-peak W1W1 amplitude
AW2A_{W2} 2.27\simeq 2.27 mag Peak-to-peak W2W2 amplitude
Median W1W2W1-W2 0.91\simeq 0.91 mag Red MIR colour during the event
Colour–magnitude slope 0.42±0.16-0.42\pm 0.16 Redder when brighter in MIR
Global flux–flux slope 2.17±0.212.17\pm 0.21 Overall W2W2-enhanced variability
Rise flux–flux slope 1.51±0.091.51\pm 0.09 Rising branch, epochs 0–6
Decline flux–flux slope 2.01±0.182.01\pm 0.18 Declining branch, epochs 7–21
W1W1 positive-excess width 697\simeq 697 d Temporal width of W1W1 excess
W2W2 positive-excess width 781\simeq 781 d Broader W2W2 excess
W1W1 positive fluence 2.29×104\simeq 2.29\times 10^{4} mJy d Integrated W1W1 excess
W2W2 positive fluence 5.12×104\simeq 5.12\times 10^{4} mJy d W2W2-dominated MIR fluence
W2/W1W2/W1 fluence ratio 2.23±0.122.23\pm 0.12 W2W2 carries about twice the positive fluence
Table 3: Model-independent W1W1W2W2 timing and scale diagnostics. The peak and centroid offsets are given in the rest frame. The centroid values are positive-fluence centroids of the baseline-subtracted WISE excess light curves. The uncertainties include Monte Carlo resampling of the epoch fluxes and bootstrap resampling of the four pre-flare baseline candidates.
Diagnostic Value Light-travel scale Comment
W1W1 excess peak epoch 6, MJD 57727.5 Hotter W1W1-dominated maximum
W2W2 excess peak epoch 7, MJD 57923.0 W2W2 maximum occurs later
W2W2W1W1 peak offset 191.8191.8 d 0.1610.161 pc Sensitive to sparse NEOWISE cadence
W1W1 positive-fluence centroid MJD 58088.6±44.0{\rm MJD}\ 58088.6\pm 44.0 Centroid of positive W1W1 excess
W2W2 positive-fluence centroid MJD 58316.7±18.8{\rm MJD}\ 58316.7\pm 18.8 Centroid of positive W2W2 excess
W2W2W1W1 centroid offset 224±45224\pm 45 d 0.188±0.0380.188\pm 0.038 pc Preferred effective W2W2W1W1 scale
Table 4: Effective W1W1W2W2 colour-blackbody diagnostics. These quantities are derived from the two-band WISE excess fluxes and provide effective diagnostics of the temperature, emitting scale, and luminosity evolution of the MIR flare.
Stage TeffT_{\rm eff} RBBR_{\rm BB} LIRL_{\rm IR} Interpretation
K pc erg s-1
Rise 900\sim 900 0.03\sim 0.030.050.05 1043\sim 10^{43} Hotter compact MIR-emitting region
Turnover/peak 700\sim 700850850 0.10\sim 0.100.150.15 (2\sim(23)×10433)\times 10^{43} Maximum effective emitting area
Post-peak decline 500\sim 500600600 0.10\sim 0.100.150.15 1043\sim 10^{43} Cooler longer-lived W2W2-dominated component
Integrated EIRE_{\rm IR}, reliable epochs 2.9×1051\simeq 2.9\times 10^{51} erg Fiducial reliable-epoch estimate
Integrated EIRE_{\rm IR}, all finite 3.8×1051\simeq 3.8\times 10^{51} erg All finite non-baseline estimates
Table 5: Comparison of the one-, two-, and three-component smooth joint W1+W2W1+W2 phenomenological models using the effective error floor.
Model kk dof χeff2\chi^{2}_{\rm eff} AICeff BICeff ΔBIC\Delta{\rm BIC}
One component 5 39 321.70 331.70 340.62 281.7
Two components 10 34 21.06 41.06 58.91 0.0
Three components 15 29 14.80 44.80 71.56 12.7

4.2 Model-independent W2W2W1W1 timing and effective MIR scale

The W2W2 emission is delayed relative to W1W1, as independently indicated by both peak-based and positive-fluence centroid diagnostics. The W2W2 excess peak occurs 191.8191.8 d after the W1W1 excess peak, corresponding to cΔtpeak=0.161c\Delta t_{\rm peak}=0.161 pc (Table 3). This peak-based estimate is sensitive to the discrete NEOWISE sampling and is therefore used only as a supporting timing diagnostic.

The positive-fluence centroid provides the preferred timing measure because it uses the full positive-excess light curve and is less dependent on a single sampled maximum. For the combined AllWISE 2010 plus pre-rise NEOWISE baseline, the Monte Carlo resampling with bootstrap resampling of the baseline candidates gives Δtcent=224±45\Delta t_{\rm cent}=224\pm 45 d, corresponding to cΔtcent=0.188±0.038c\Delta t_{\rm cent}=0.188\pm 0.038 pc (Table 3). We adopt this value as the characteristic W2W2W1W1 MIR timing scale. The difference between the Monte Carlo estimate and the corresponding fixed-baseline value reflects the bootstrap resampling of the pre-flare baseline candidates included in the uncertainty analysis.

The W2W2W1W1 centroid offset persists across alternative baseline choices. In fixed-baseline recalculations, using only the first two pre-rise NEOWISE epochs gives Δtcent207\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 207 d, corresponding to cΔtcent0.173c\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 0.173 pc; using the combined AllWISE 2010 plus NEOWISE epochs 0–1 baseline gives Δtcent234\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 234 d, corresponding to cΔtcent0.196c\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 0.196 pc; and using only the two 2010 AllWISE epochs gives Δtcent257\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 257 d, corresponding to cΔtcent0.215c\Delta t_{\rm cent}\simeq 0.215 pc (Appendix E). Although the exact value depends slightly on the adopted baseline, all tested definitions consistently indicate a delayed W2W2 response on sub-parsec scales.

The W2W2 excess is also broader in time than W1W1. The positive-excess temporal widths are approximately 697697 d for W1W1 and 781781 d for W2W2, with a width ratio of 1.12\simeq 1.12. Together with the larger W2W2 fluence, this demonstrates that the W2W2 response is both broader and more energetic than that of W1W1.

As an independent model-dependent characterisation of the light-curve morphology, we fitted a shift-and-broaden W1W1-to-W2W2 template model, in which the W2W2 excess is represented as a shifted and temporally smoothed version of the W1W1 excess. This gives a compact, effective shift of τ110±20\tau\simeq 110\pm 20 d, corresponding to cτ0.092±0.017c\tau\simeq 0.092\pm 0.017 pc. The existence of two characteristic scales reflects that the W2W2 evolution combines a compact delayed component with substantial temporal broadening. The centroid scale traces the broader W2W2-weighted dust response, whereas τ\tau characterises the more compact shift component of the W1W1-to-W2W2 evolution. Taken together, these timing diagnostics show that the W2W2 evolution is broader than a simple shifted replica of W1W1, indicating an extended MIR response.

4.3 Thermal evolution and IR energetics

The effective W1W1W2W2 colour-blackbody analysis provides an independent empirical view of the thermal evolution of the MIR flare. Figure 5 shows the evolution of the effective colour temperature, blackbody radius, and approximate bolometric IR luminosity derived from the baseline-subtracted WISE excess fluxes.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Evolution of the effective W1W1W2W2 colour-blackbody properties of UGC 11487. From top to bottom: effective colour temperature, effective blackbody radius, and approximate bolometric IR luminosity. Filled symbols mark reliable epochs, while open symbols mark finite but non-reliable estimates. These quantities are derived from the two-band WISE excess fluxes and are used as effective diagnostics of the temperature, emitting scale, and luminosity evolution of the MIR flare.

Finite TeffT_{\rm eff} solutions are obtained for 20 non-baseline epochs. Of these, 12 epochs satisfy the adopted reliability cuts on the excess-flux signal-to-noise ratio and on the fractional uncertainties in TeffT_{\rm eff}, RBBR_{\rm BB}, and LIRL_{\rm IR}. The remaining eight finite estimates are retained as poorly constrained, mainly because the W1W1 excess approaches the baseline at late times while W2W2 remains detectable. The first two NEOWISE epochs are used as part of the baseline definition and are therefore not assigned reliable colour-blackbody quantities.

The effective colour temperature decreases during the event. During the rise, TeffT_{\rm eff} is of order 900900 K. Near the MIR maximum it is typically 700\sim 700850850 K, and during the decline it decreases to 500\sim 500600600 K. Over the same period, the effective blackbody radius increases from 0.03\sim 0.030.050.05 pc on the rise to 0.1\sim 0.10.150.15 pc near and after the MIR maximum (Fig. 5). This evolution suggests a transition from a hotter compact MIR component to a cooler and more persistent W2W2-dominated response. At late times, the uncertainties in RBBR_{\rm BB} and LIRL_{\rm IR} increase because the W1W1 excess approaches the baseline while W2W2 remains detectable. These late-time estimates are therefore retained as poorly constrained effective emitting-radius estimates and are not used to infer precise dust radii.

The approximate bolometric IR luminosity reaches 3×1043\sim 3\times 10^{43} erg s-1. Integrating the effective LIR(t)L_{\rm IR}(t) over rest-frame time gives EIR2.9×1051E_{\rm IR}\simeq 2.9\times 10^{51} erg for the fiducial reliable-epoch estimate. Including all finite non-baseline estimates gives EIR3.8×1051E_{\rm IR}\simeq 3.8\times 10^{51} erg. We therefore regard the two-band effective IR energy as being of order a few 105110^{51} erg.

The combined decrease in effective temperature, increase in emitting scale, and persistence of the W2W2-dominated emission independently support a thermally stratified and temporally extended MIR response.

4.4 Model evidence for a multi-zone dust response

The smooth joint W1+W2W1+W2 phenomenological modelling shows that the observed WISE morphology cannot be adequately reproduced by a single smooth component. With the effective-error treatment, the one-component model gives χeff2=321.70\chi^{2}_{\rm eff}=321.70 and is strongly disfavoured relative to the two-component model, with ΔBIC=281.7\Delta{\rm BIC}=281.7 (Table 5). The smooth two-component model provides the preferred compact phenomenological description, with χeff2=21.06\chi^{2}_{\rm eff}=21.06, BICeff=58.91{\rm BIC}_{\rm eff}=58.91, and ΔBIC=0\Delta{\rm BIC}=0.

The three-component model reduces χeff2\chi^{2}_{\rm eff} to 14.80 and follows the marginal late W2W2 shoulder more closely. However, after penalising the additional free parameters, it is disfavoured relative to the two-component model by ΔBIC=12.7\Delta{\rm BIC}=12.7. We therefore adopt the smooth two-component model as the preferred phenomenological description of the WISE morphology, while treating the three-component case as a diagnostic of possible late-time residual structure. The Monte Carlo parameter estimates for the preferred smooth two-component model are listed in Table 10.

In this phenomenological description, the first component is hotter and contributes more strongly to the early W1W1 emission, while the second component is cooler and longer-lived, contributing mainly to the W2W2-bright decline. This decomposition captures the main phase-dependent structure of the MIR flare and is consistent with a radially or thermally stratified dust response.

We also applied the clumpy dust-echo model driven by hydrodynamical TDE fallback curves described in Sect. 3.4 and Appendix B. The aim was to test whether the empirical MIR diagnostics of UGC 11487 can be reproduced by a smoothed TDE-like luminosity input reprocessed by a structured dust distribution. The adopted luminosity normalisation gives an effective bolometric input energy of Einput=2.44×1052E_{\rm input}=2.44\times 10^{52} erg. For a fiducial radiative efficiency of ηrad=0.1\eta_{\rm rad}=0.1, this corresponds to an accreted-mass scale of order 0.1M0.1\,M_{\odot}, consistent with the MIR energy-budget estimate discussed in Sect. 4.3.

The STARS fallback curves were not selected a priori to match the WISE light curves. We explored hydrodynamical fallback cases with β=2.0\beta=2.0 and a grid of effective accretion-smoothing parameters. The representative solutions in Table 6 were selected using the combined objective function described in Appendix B. These representative solutions demonstrate that fallback-driven luminosity inputs can reproduce the empirical WISE diagnostics after accretion smoothing and dust reprocessing.

Within the explored parameter grid, representative three-zone solutions reproduce the combined empirical diagnostics more consistently than the corresponding two-zone cases. Representative three-zone solutions reproduce the main empirical diagnostics: the W2W2W1W1 centroid offset, the W2/W1W2/W1 fluence ratio, the W2/W1W2/W1 temporal-width ratio, and the W2W2-enhanced declining branch. The detailed fallback curve, accretion-smoothing timescale, and dust-zone parameters remain degenerate, as expected for sparsely sampled two-band MIR data.

Table 6: Representative three-zone clumpy dust-echo models driven by hydrodynamical TDE fallback curves. 222Case A is the formally best objective solution. Case B is adopted as the fiducial compromise model because it preserves the main WISE timing, fluence, and width diagnostics while requiring a lower peak Eddington ratio. Case C is a lower-Eddington alternative with a somewhat larger global flux–flux slope. The labels hot, warm, and cool denote the relative ordering of the WISE-emitting dust zones in the model. All three cases are normalised to Einput=2.44×1052E_{\rm input}=2.44\times 10^{52} erg.
Quantity Case A Case B Case C
STARS case m1.0_t0.57m1.0\_t0.57 m1.0_t1.0m1.0\_t1.0 m1.0_t1.0m1.0\_t1.0
β\beta 2.0 2.0 2.0
τvisc\tau_{\rm visc} (d) 300 500 700
tcirct_{\rm circ} (d) 150 150 150
tshiftt_{\rm shift} (d) 178.9 117.6 295.0
Lpeak/LEddL_{\rm peak}/L_{\rm Edd} 0.841 0.561 0.415
Objective 5.101 5.462 6.558
τhot\tau_{\rm hot} (d) 280 274 64
ThotT_{\rm hot} (K) 857 853 1079
τwarm\tau_{\rm warm} (d) 675 675 379
TwarmT_{\rm warm} (K) 500 500 503
τcool\tau_{\rm cool} (d) 1954 2026 1300
TcoolT_{\rm cool} (K) 432 399 309
Δtcentmodel(W2W1)\Delta t_{\rm cent}^{\rm model}(W2-W1) (d) 217.3 216.4 218.6
ΦW2/ΦW1\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1} 2.245 2.218 2.263
σt,W2/σt,W1\sigma_{t,W2}/\sigma_{t,W1} 1.087 1.106 1.097
mffm_{\rm ff} 1.813 1.817 1.870
mrisem_{\rm rise} 1.795 1.830 1.648
mdeclinem_{\rm decline} 1.975 1.944 1.941

Case A gives the lowest objective value and reproduces the W2W2W1W1 centroid offset and fluence ratio well, but it requires the highest peak luminosity, Lpeak/LEdd0.84L_{\rm peak}/L_{\rm Edd}\simeq 0.84, and underestimates the global flux–flux slope relative to the empirical value. Case B is adopted as the fiducial compromise model. It has a lower peak luminosity, Lpeak/LEdd0.56L_{\rm peak}/L_{\rm Edd}\simeq 0.56, while preserving the main timing, fluence, and width diagnostics: Δtcentmodel(W2W1)=216.4\Delta t_{\rm cent}^{\rm model}(W2-W1)=216.4 d, ΦW2/ΦW1=2.218\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1}=2.218, and σt,W2/σt,W1=1.106\sigma_{t,W2}/\sigma_{t,W1}=1.106. Case C provides a still lower-Eddington alternative, with Lpeak/LEdd0.42L_{\rm peak}/L_{\rm Edd}\simeq 0.42 and a somewhat larger global flux–flux slope, but with a higher objective value and a colder outer response component.

The fiducial Case B model is illustrated in Figs. 6 and 7. The schematic clumpy dust distribution and corresponding delay-response functions are shown in Fig. 6. The same model is compared with the WISE excess light curves in Fig. 7. It reproduces the delayed and broader W2W2 response, the larger W2W2 fluence, and the W2W2-enhanced decline. The qualitative conclusion is stable across the selected hydrodynamical drivers: the WISE data are consistently reproduced by a structured multi-zone response, with an early component contributing to W1W1 and a broader, cooler component producing the delayed and more persistent W2W2 emission.

We therefore use these hydro-clumpy solutions as representative physical consistency models. Within the constraints of the available two-band WISE data, they represent plausible structured dust-response scenarios for the circumnuclear environment. The different roles of the phenomenological decomposition and hydro-clumpy modelling are discussed in Appendix B.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Illustrative clumpy dust distribution and corresponding delay-response functions for the fiducial hydro-clumpy model. The left panel shows a schematic projected Monte Carlo realisation of the hot, warm, and cool dust zones around the nuclear transient. The right panel shows the fitted delay-response functions of these zones. This visualisation shows the effective multi-zone response used to reproduce the WISE diagnostics. Hotter dust at shorter effective delays contributes mainly to the early W1W1 response, whereas cooler, more extended dust produces the delayed, W2W2-dominated decline.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: WISE W1W1 and W2W2 excess light curves compared with the fiducial hydrodynamically driven clumpy dust-echo model. The model uses a smoothed, STARS-fallback-driven luminosity input and a three-zone dust-response structure. It reproduces the delayed and broader W2W2 response, the larger W2W2 fluence, and the W2W2-enhanced decline, supporting the interpretation of a structured circumnuclear dust response.

4.5 Possible late-time W2W2 excess and MIR–radio scale comparison

We tested whether the apparent late-time W2W2 residual around epochs 17–19 in Fig. 1 represents a significant secondary excess. We fitted the surrounding post-peak W2W2 decline with a smooth exponential-plus-constant profile after excluding epochs 17–19, and then measured the residuals of the excluded epochs relative to this smooth decline. The details of this local residual test are given in Appendix E.

The W2W2 residual over epochs 17–19 is positive at the 2.1σ\sim 2.1\sigma level, while the corresponding W1W1 residual is not significant, at 0.9σ\sim 0.9\sigma. The largest positive W2W2 residuals occur at epochs 17 and 18, whereas epoch 19 is consistent with the smooth decline within the uncertainties. We therefore identify this feature as a marginal late-time W2W2 shoulder within the long MIR decline. Its W2W2-dominated character is consistent with a cooler and more persistent MIR component, although the statistical significance remains modest.

We also compared the MIR-derived scales with the radio properties reported by Golay et al. (2025), which independently probe the compact nuclear environment of WTP14adeqka. The VLBA-resolved radio size is 0.1110.1110.1270.127 pc, while the VLA SED radio radii are 0.0570.0570.0620.062 pc. The preferred model-independent W2W2W1W1 centroid scale, cΔtcent=0.188±0.038c\Delta t_{\rm cent}=0.188\pm 0.038 pc, traces the broader W2W2-weighted dust response, whereas the shift-and-broaden W1W1-to-W2W2 analysis gives a shorter compact-shift scale, cτ=0.092±0.017c\tau=0.092\pm 0.017 pc. The latter lies above the VLA SED radio radii and close to the VLBA-resolved size.

This scale ordering supports a structured sub-parsec nuclear environment in which WISE traces thermal dust reprocessing over a radially or thermally extended dust distribution, while the radio emission traces synchrotron-emitting outflow or shock material on comparable compact nuclear scales. For a launch epoch near the onset of the positive MIR excess, the velocity required to reach the compact MIR shift scale by the W2W2-shoulder epoch is βreq0.040\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.040, comparable in magnitude to the published radio expansion velocities for WTP14adeqka (Table 13). The relative placement of the characteristic MIR and radio scales is shown in Fig. 8. Their possible physical connection is discussed in Sect. 5.5.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: Comparison of characteristic MIR and radio scales. The shaded region marks the VLBA-resolved radio-size range. The W2W2W1W1 centroid scale traces the broader W2W2-weighted dust response, while the shift-and-broaden W1W1-to-W2W2 scale gives a shorter compact-shift diagnostic. The figure places the thermal MIR dust-response diagnostics and the synchrotron radio-emitting region within the central sub-parsec nuclear environment.

4.6 Time-averaged host-galaxy properties from UV-to-radio SED modelling

The broadband UV–radio SED of UGC 11487 was modelled with CIGALE using the aperture-matched photometry described in Sect. 3.6 and in detail in Appendix F. The initial grid parameters and the CIGALE modules used for SED modelling are described in Appendix G. The fit reproduces the observed host-galaxy SED with a reduced χν22.27\chi^{2}_{\nu}\simeq 2.27 (Fig. 9; Table 7). The Bayesian estimates indicate a moderately star-forming host galaxy, with M=(2.01±0.15)×1010MM_{\star}=(2.01\pm 0.15)\times 10^{10}\,M_{\odot}, SFR=2.92±0.15Myr1{\rm SFR}=2.92\pm 0.15\,M_{\odot}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}, and sSFR1.45×1010yr1{\rm sSFR}\simeq 1.45\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}.

The fitted SED is consistent with moderate stellar-continuum attenuation and stronger attenuation towards the nebular-emitting regions: E(BV)=0.176±0.001E(B-V)_{\star}=0.176\pm 0.001, E(BV)lines=0.400±0.003E(B-V)_{\rm lines}=0.400\pm 0.003, and E(BV)/E(BV)lines0.44E(B-V)_{\star}/E(B-V)_{\rm lines}\simeq 0.44. The corresponding FUV attenuation is AFUV=2.17±0.02A_{\rm FUV}=2.17\pm 0.02 mag. The infrared emission is dominated by star-formation-heated dust, with Ldust=(1.05±0.05)×1037WL_{\rm dust}=(1.05\pm 0.05)\times 10^{37}\,{\rm W}, log(Ldust/L)10.44\log(L_{\rm dust}/L_{\odot})\simeq 10.44, and αdust=1.67±0.08\alpha_{\rm dust}=1.67\pm 0.08, placing UGC 11487 below the classical LIRG regime. The low-significance IRAS 12, 25, and 60 μm\mu{\rm m} measurements were treated as upper limits, and the 100 μm\mu{\rm m} point as a marginal far-infrared constraint, as described in Appendix F.

Overall, the host-galaxy properties are consistent with a moderately star-forming isolated barred disc in which the MIR flare appears as a transient phenomenon superposed on an otherwise normal galaxy.

Refer to caption
Figure 9: Best-fitting CIGALE model for the broadband UV–radio SED of UGC 11487. The fit is based on the aperture-matched host-galaxy photometry described in Sect. 3.6. Upper limits are included where appropriate for the low-significance IRAS bands.
Table 7: CIGALE-derived host-galaxy properties of UGC 11487.
Quantity Value
Reduced χν2\chi^{2}_{\nu} 2.27\simeq 2.27
MM_{\star} (2.01±0.15)×1010M(2.01\pm 0.15)\times 10^{10}\,M_{\odot}
SFR 2.92±0.15Myr12.92\pm 0.15\,M_{\odot}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}
sSFR 1.45×1010yr1\simeq 1.45\times 10^{-10}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}
E(BV)E(B-V)_{\star} 0.176±0.0010.176\pm 0.001
E(BV)linesE(B-V)_{\rm lines} 0.400±0.0030.400\pm 0.003
AFUVA_{\rm FUV} 2.17±0.022.17\pm 0.02 mag
LdustL_{\rm dust} (1.05±0.05)×1037W(1.05\pm 0.05)\times 10^{37}\,{\rm W}
log(Ldust/L)\log(L_{\rm dust}/L_{\odot}) 10.44\simeq 10.44
αdust\alpha_{\rm dust} 1.67±0.081.67\pm 0.08
fAGNf_{\rm AGN} 0.003±0.0060.003\pm 0.006
Best-fit fAGNf_{\rm AGN} 0

5 Discussion

5.1 UGC 11487 as an obscured TDE-like nuclear flare

UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka is a long-lived MIR-selected nuclear flare whose evolution is dominated by dust-reprocessed emission. The decade-scale WISE light curve shows a larger peak-to-peak amplitude and a larger time-integrated excess in W2W2 than in W1W1, together with an RWB trend and phase-dependent flux–flux behaviour (Table 2). These properties are consistent with a transient heating event followed by a structured dust response, as expected when a substantial fraction of the primary UV/optical radiation from a nuclear transient is absorbed and re-emitted by circumnuclear dust (Jiang et al., 2016, 2021; Masterson et al., 2024; Necker et al., 2025).

The MIR evolution is consistent with a dust-obscured nuclear transient and, in particular, with a TDE-like accretion episode reprocessed by circumnuclear dust. A definitive classification as a classical TDE is limited by the absence of a directly and densely sampled primary optical/UV flare. Alternative nuclear-accretion scenarios, including an accretion-state change or a changing-look AGN episode, therefore remain viable. We consequently interpret UGC 11487 as an obscured TDE candidate or TDE-like nuclear flare.

5.2 Host-galaxy context and the transient nature of the MIR flare

The host-galaxy SED modelling presented in Sect. 4.6 provides an important context for interpreting the MIR flare. The time-averaged UV–far-infrared emission of UGC 11487 is consistent with a moderately star-forming barred disc whose broadband energy budget is dominated by stellar light and star-formation-heated dust. In the adopted CIGALE model, the persistent broadband AGN contribution is negligible, with a best-fit value consistent with zero.

This result separates the time-averaged host-galaxy emission from the transient MIR component. The decade-long WISE flare, strong W2W2 excess, colour hysteresis, and delayed W2W2 response cannot be explained as static features of the host-galaxy SED and require an additional time-dependent nuclear component. UGC 11487 therefore appears to be a moderately star-forming isolated barred disc that underwent a temporary nuclear dust-reprocessing episode, compatible with an obscured TDE-like or other short-lived nuclear accretion event.

5.3 TDEs as transient activity episodes in Milky Way analogue galaxies

TDEs in the Milky Way would be associated with Sgr A*, although no Galactic TDE has been directly observed to date. Evidence for episodic past activity of Sgr A* has been obtained from X-ray observations of molecular clouds in the Galactic Centre region. In particular, studies by Sunyaev and collaborators demonstrated that several dense clouds, including Sgr B2, act as natural X-ray reflection nebulae, reprocessing radiation emitted during past high-luminosity flares of the Galactic SMBH (Revnivtsev et al., 2004; Churazov et al., 2017; Khabibullin et al., 2022; Marin et al., 2023). Variability, spectral properties, and polarisation measurements of the reflected emission indicate that Sgr A* experienced significantly higher activity in the recent past than in its present quiescent state.

In general, the expected TDE rate is low, of the order of ΓTDE105104yr1\Gamma_{\rm TDE}\sim 10^{-5}-10^{-4}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}, corresponding to approximately one event per 10410^{4}10510^{5} yr (Komossa, 2015; Alexander, 2005). Nevertheless, episodic TDE-driven energy injection has been discussed as a possible contributor to the past activity of Sgr A* and to large-scale Galactic-centre structures such as the Fermi and eROSITA bubbles (Sazonov and Sunyaev, 2012; Bland-Hawthorn et al., 2013; Su et al., 2010; Predehl et al., 2020).

In this context, TDEs may represent short-lived episodes in the evolution of otherwise normal spiral galaxies. Systems such as UGC 11487 are therefore of particular interest, since they demonstrate that quiescent Milky-Way-like galaxies can occasionally undergo energetic accretion events associated with stellar disruption and temporarily exhibit enhanced nuclear activity. Such episodes may provide a glimpse of processes that could have occurred in the recent history of the Milky Way itself. Consequently, TDE candidates among isolated barred galaxies offer a useful bridge between studies of transient accretion phenomena and evolutionary diagnostics of MWNeTs (Vavilova et al., 2026)

5.4 Structured dust response and TDE-like reprocessing

Several independent diagnostics consistently indicate that a single self-similar MIR response is inadequate for UGC 11487. The W2W2 emission peaks later than W1W1, declines more slowly, and has a larger positive fluence. The preferred model-independent timing diagnostic is the positive-fluence centroid offset, Δtcent=224±45\Delta t_{\rm cent}=224\pm 45 d, corresponding to cΔtcent=0.188±0.038c\Delta t_{\rm cent}=0.188\pm 0.038 pc. This scale traces the broader W2W2-weighted dust response. The shift-and-broaden W1W1-to-W2W2 analysis gives a shorter compact-shift scale, τ110±20\tau\simeq 110\pm 20 d, corresponding to cτ0.092±0.017c\tau\simeq 0.092\pm 0.017 pc, showing that the W2W2 evolution combines a delayed response with substantial temporal broadening.

The colour–magnitude and flux–flux behaviour support the same picture. The RWB colour–magnitude trend is accompanied by a W2W2-enhanced declining branch in the flux–flux plane. This hysteresis-like behaviour suggests that cooler dust continues to emit after the hotter W1W1-dominated component has faded. The effective colour-blackbody diagnostics show a coherent cooling trend, from 900\sim 900 K during the rise to 500\sim 500600600 K during the decline, while the effective emitting radius increases to sub-parsec scales. These two-band quantities trace the temperature, emitting scale, and luminosity evolution of the MIR-emitting dust.

The smooth phenomenological modelling also favours a structured response. A single smooth W1+W2W1+W2 component is strongly disfavoured, while the preferred two-component phenomenological description provides the most compact representation once the adopted effective-error treatment and BIC penalty are included. The late W2W2 shoulder remains a marginal residual within the long MIR decline, with insufficient significance to define a separate flare. The robust observational result is therefore a delayed, broader, and more persistent W2W2 response, consistent with a multi-zone circumnuclear dust structure.

The hydrodynamically driven clumpy dust-echo models provide a physical consistency test linking these empirical WISE diagnostics to a TDE-like accretion scenario. In this framework, the main MIR properties of UGC 11487 can be reproduced when a hydrodynamical fallback input is smoothed by an effective accretion/circularisation timescale and reprocessed by a multi-zone circumnuclear dust distribution. The observable MIR emission is expected to differ from the prompt fallback rate because the event can be reshaped by circularisation, shocks in incompletely circularised debris, outflows, reprocessing layers, viewing geometry, light-travel-time delays, dust temperature stratification, and the radial distribution of the reprocessing material (Roth et al., 2020b). With only W1W1 and W2W2 photometry, the detailed fallback history, smoothing timescale, and dust geometry remain degenerate.

The representative hydro-clumpy models require an accreted mass of order 0.1M0.1\,M_{\odot}, consistent with the MIR energy-budget estimate discussed in Sect. 4.3 and with partial accretion of bound debris in a TDE-like event. Across the tested models, W2W2 remains delayed, broader, and more persistent than W1W1, and the declining branch remains W2W2-enhanced. The hydro-clumpy modelling therefore supports the interpretation of UGC 11487 as a TDE-like accretion transient reprocessed by structured circumnuclear dust.

The strength of this interpretation comes from the combination of diagnostics: timing, colour evolution, flux–flux hysteresis, effective cooling, phenomenological model comparison, and hydro-clumpy consistency tests all point to a structured multi-zone circumnuclear response.

5.5 MIR–radio connection and energetic consistency

Independent radio observations of WTP14adeqka provide an external probe of the compact nuclear environment (Golay et al., 2025). Together with the WISE data, they allow a comparison between thermal dust reprocessing and synchrotron-emitting plasma associated with jets, outflows, unbound debris, or shocks in TDEs (Alexander et al., 2020; Roth et al., 2020b). The MIR and radio observations therefore provide complementary diagnostics of the circumnuclear response to the same nuclear transient.

Delayed radio emission is increasingly recognised as an important stage of TDE evolution. Radio emission emerging hundreds to thousands of days after discovery has been reported in both optically and X-ray-selected TDEs, favouring delayed outflows in many systems (Cendes et al., 2024; Goodwin et al., 2025). Long-lived radio emission may also contain multiple temporal components and be affected by host contamination (Christy et al., 2026), while years-delayed radio flares in slowly evolving TDE candidates provide a relevant comparison for WTP14adeqka (Zhang et al., 2026).

We compared the MIR-derived timing and response scales with the independent radio constraints reported by Golay et al. (2025), using the radio measurements only as external reference quantities. The compact MIR shift scale from the shift-and-broaden analysis, cτ=0.092±0.017c\tau=0.092\pm 0.017 pc, is comparable to the VLBA characteristic size of approximately 0.110.110.130.13 pc reported by Golay et al. (2025). The preferred W2W2W1W1 centroid scale, cΔtcent=0.188±0.038c\Delta t_{\rm cent}=0.188\pm 0.038 pc, is larger and traces the broader W2W2-weighted dust response. Since the MIR and radio quantities are derived from different observables, their agreement should be interpreted as an order-of-magnitude consistency of characteristic sub-parsec scales.

The marginal late-time W2W2 shoulder occurs during the radio-bright phase. Assuming a launch epoch near the onset of the positive MIR excess, the velocity required to reach the compact MIR shift scale by the W2W2-shoulder epoch is βreq0.040\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.040, comparable to the VLBA size-increase velocity reported for WTP14adeqka (Table 13). Although this travel-time estimate depends on the assumed launch epoch, the temporal ordering and characteristic scales are compatible with an interaction between a radio-emitting outflow or shock and compact dusty circumnuclear material.

Several physical scenarios can account for delayed radio activity. In the debris–torus collision model of Lei et al. (2024), unbound TDE debris impacts a dusty torus and produces a delayed radio outburst. Alternatively, Linial et al. (2026) proposed that viscous expansion of the TDE accretion disc can lead to repeated collisions with a pre-existing stellar EMRI, launching a slow and energetic outflow after an intrinsic delay. They identified WTP14adeqka as a plausible example of this mechanism. Within the structured dust environment inferred from the WISE evolution, either promptly produced debris or an intrinsically delayed outflow could contribute to late-time dust heating or reprocessing while propagating through compact circumnuclear material.

The late-time W2W2 shoulder remains only marginally significant, and the MIR and radio measurements trace physically distinct emitting components. The present observations therefore establish temporal and order-of-magnitude scale consistency, whereas the launching mechanism of the radio outflow and its causal connection to the late-time MIR evolution remain model-dependent.

The IR and radio energetics provide an additional consistency check for the TDE-like interpretation. Using the effective IR energy derived from the WISE light curves together with the published kinetic-energy scale of the radio-emitting outflow, we obtain Macc0.040.22MM_{\rm acc}\simeq 0.04{-}0.22\,M_{\odot} for EIR(2.93.8)×1051E_{\rm IR}\simeq(2.9{-}3.8)\times 10^{51} erg, EK,radio1050.7E_{\rm K,radio}\sim 10^{50.7} erg, ηeff=0.1\eta_{\rm eff}=0.1, and fcov=0.10.5f_{\rm cov}=0.1{-}0.5. For an accreted fraction facc=0.10.5f_{\rm acc}=0.1{-}0.5, this corresponds to an illustrative disrupted-star mass scale of M,scale0.072.2MM_{\star,\rm scale}\simeq 0.07{-}2.2\,M_{\odot}. These order-of-magnitude estimates indicate that the energetics inferred independently from the infrared flare and the radio-emitting outflow are mutually compatible with a TDE-like event involving a star with a sub-solar to a few-solar-mass scale.

5.6 Limitations and implications

The main limitations follow directly from the available data. WISE provides only two MIR bands, so TeffT_{\rm eff}, RBBR_{\rm BB}, LIRL_{\rm IR}, and EIRE_{\rm IR} are effective two-band colour-blackbody diagnostics of the MIR evolution. The NEOWISE cadence is sparse, making the positive-fluence centroid a more stable timing measure than the discrete W1W1 and W2W2 peak epochs. The pre-flare baseline also introduces a systematic uncertainty, which motivated the baseline-sensitivity tests of the W2W2W1W1 centroid scale.

More detailed dust-echo and reprocessing modelling can provide stronger geometric constraints when the driving optical/UV flare is well sampled. For example, convex-ring or torus-remnant models applied to AT 2019qiz (Wu et al., 2025), and multi-component disk-reprocessing and MIR dust-echo modelling of AT 2020nov (Earl et al., 2025), demonstrate how broader multiwavelength coverage can separate the primary emission, reprocessing structure, and dust response. In UGC 11487, the primary optical/UV driver was not observed, and the MIR coverage is limited to W1W1 and W2W2. The preferred two-component phenomenological W1+W2W1+W2 description therefore constrains the presence of a structured MIR response, while the detailed dust geometry remains degenerate.

The radio measurements provide an important independent consistency check. They were not incorporated into the fitting procedure and therefore cannot remove the intrinsic degeneracies of the infrared modelling. In addition, the radio sizes reported by Golay et al. (2025) are VLBA-derived characteristic Gaussian scales, whereas the MIR quantities are light-travel response scales inferred from WISE timing. Their comparison should therefore be treated as a characteristic-scale consistency test.

The main observational conclusions are robust within these limitations: W2W2 peaks later than W1W1, declines more slowly, has a larger positive fluence, shows phase-dependent flux–flux behaviour, and traces a cooling effective dust component.

The present data leave the detailed three-dimensional dust structure degenerate. Even with this limitation, phase-resolved W1W1W2W2 diagnostics recover characteristic sub-parsec response scales and provide valuable constraints on the internal structure of dust reprocessing in obscured accretion-powered transients.

6 Conclusions

We investigated the decade-long MIR flare of the TDE candidate UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka using phase-resolved WISE/NEOWISE observations, empirical W1W1W2W2 diagnostics, phenomenological decomposition, and physically motivated hydro-clumpy dust-echo modelling. The main goal was to determine whether the observed MIR evolution can be described by a single self-similar response or whether it requires a structured circumnuclear dust response. Our main conclusions are as follows:

  1. 1.

    UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka exhibits a decade-long MIR flare dominated by dust-reprocessed emission. The flare shows a larger amplitude and positive fluence in W2W2 than in W1W1, a delayed and broader W2W2 response, redder-when-brighter colour evolution, and flux–flux hysteresis. These properties demonstrate that the MIR evolution is strongly phase dependent.

  2. 2.

    The model-independent internal MIR timing diagnostics give a preferred positive-fluence centroid delay of Δtcent=224±45\Delta t_{\rm cent}=224\pm 45 d, corresponding to a characteristic light-travel scale of 0.188±0.0380.188\pm 0.038 pc. The shift-and-broaden analysis gives a shorter compact-shift scale, cτ=0.092±0.017c\tau=0.092\pm 0.017 pc. These two scales trace different aspects of the W1W1W2W2 response: the compact shift of the MIR evolution and the broader W2W2-weighted dust response.

  3. 3.

    The effective colour-blackbody diagnostics show systematic thermal evolution, with TeffT_{\rm eff} decreasing from 900\sim 900 K during the rise to 500\sim 500600600 K during the decline. The effective IR luminosity reaches 3×1043\sim 3\times 10^{43} erg s-1, and the integrated IR energy is of order (2.9(2.93.8)×10513.8)\times 10^{51} erg.

  4. 4.

    The smooth phenomenological modelling shows that a single-component W1+W2W1+W2 description is strongly disfavoured. The preferred compact description is the two-component phenomenological model, with χeff2=21.06\chi^{2}_{\rm eff}=21.06, BICeff=58.91{\rm BIC}_{\rm eff}=58.91, and ΔBIC=0\Delta{\rm BIC}=0. The three-component model follows the marginal late W2W2 shoulder more closely, but is disfavoured after the BIC penalty. Representative hydro-clumpy models show that the empirical WISE diagnostics can be reproduced by a structured multi-zone dust response driven by a smoothed TDE-like luminosity input.

  5. 5.

    Independent radio observations provide an external consistency check on the compact nuclear environment. The compact MIR shift scale, cτ=0.092±0.017c\tau=0.092\pm 0.017 pc, is comparable to the VLBA-derived major-axis Gaussian radio size of 0.11\sim 0.110.130.13 pc reported by Golay et al. (2025). The marginal late-time W2W2 shoulder occurs during the radio-bright phase. This correspondence in both spatial scale and timing is consistent with a possible connection between the MIR and radio-emitting components. Together, they suggest late-time dust heating or reprocessing in compact circumnuclear material influenced by the radio-emitting outflow or shock. The combined IR and radio energetics are compatible with a TDE-like event involving accretion of a sub-solar to solar-mass star.

  6. 6.

    The host galaxy is a moderately star-forming isolated barred disc with M2×1010MM_{\star}\simeq 2\times 10^{10}\,M_{\odot} and SFR3Myr1{\rm SFR}\simeq 3\,M_{\odot}\,{\rm yr}^{-1}. The UV-to-radio SED modelling indicates a negligible persistent AGN contribution, with fAGN=0.003±0.006f_{\rm AGN}=0.003\pm 0.006 and a best-fit value of zero. Thus, the MIR flare is best interpreted as a transient nuclear dust-reprocessing episode superposed on an otherwise normal galaxy.

Overall, UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka demonstrates that phase-resolved WISE W1W1W2W2 diagnostics can recover characteristic sub-parsec response scales and constrain the internal structure of dust reprocessing in obscured accretion-powered nuclear transients, even when the primary optical or high-energy flare is poorly sampled.

Although this study focuses on UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka, the methodology developed here is not restricted to this object. The combination of phase-resolved WISE diagnostics and physically motivated modelling demonstrates that long-term MIR observations can recover characteristic sub-parsec scales and probe the internal structure of dust reprocessing in obscured accretion-powered transients. As time-domain astronomy enters an era of increasingly sensitive multiwavelength surveys, such methods may provide a powerful new window into nuclear activity that would otherwise remain hidden.

Acknowledgements.
The research was supported by the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (project 2023.03/0188). This publication makes use of data products from the Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) and the NEOWISE mission, which are projects of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory/California Institute of Technology. WISE is funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research has made use of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive (IRSA) and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which are funded by the NASA and operated by the California Institute of Technology. We acknowledge the BHTOM (Black Hole Target and Observation Manager) platform (Mikolajczyk2025BHTOM) for facilitating the exploratory inspection and visualisation of the MIR variability of UGC 11487/WTP14adeqka. This work also uses observations obtained with the Samuel Oschin Telescope 48-inch and the 60-inch Telescope at the Palomar Observatory as part of the Zwicky Transient Facility project. ZTF is supported by the National Science Foundation under Grants No. AST-1440341 and AST-2034437 and a collaboration including Caltech, IPAC, the Oskar Klein Center at Stockholm University, the University of Maryland, University of California, Berkeley, the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee, University of Warwick, Ruhr University, Cornell University, Northwestern University, and Drexel University. Operations are conducted by COO, IPAC, and UW.

7 Data availability

The WISE/NEOWISE single-exposure photometry used in this work is publicly available through the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive (IRSA). The ZTF photometry is available through the public ZTF data services. The archival multiwavelength data used for the host-galaxy SED construction were obtained from public survey archives, including GALEX, Pan-STARRS1, 2MASS, WISE, IRAS, and NVSS. Basic redshift and literature information for UGC 11487 were taken from NED and from the references cited in the text. The radio constraints used for the MIR–radio comparison were taken from Golay et al. (2025). The CIGALE code and the STARS fallback-rate library used in this work are publicly available (Boquien et al., 2019; Law-Smith et al., 2020a, b). The processed tables and analysis scripts are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • H. Akaike (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control 19 (6), pp. 716–723. External Links: Document Cited by: §3.4.
  • K. D. Alexander, van Velzen, Sjoert, Horesh, Assaf, and Zauderer, B. Ashley (2020) Radio Properties of Tidal Disruption Events. Space Science Reviews 216 (5), pp. 81. External Links: Document, 2006.01159 Cited by: §5.5.
  • T. Alexander (2005) Stellar Processes Near the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center. Physics Reports 419 (2-3), pp. 65–142. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0508106 Cited by: §5.3.
  • E. C. Bellm, S. R. Kulkarni, M. J. Graham, R. Dekany, R. M. Smith, R. Riddle, F. J. Masci, G. Helou, T. A. Prince, S. M. Adams, C. Barbarino, T. Barlow, J. Bauer, R. Beck, J. Belicki, R. Biswas, N. Blagorodnova, D. Bodewits, B. Bolin, V. Brinnel, T. Brooke, B. Bue, M. Bulla, R. Burruss, S. B. Cenko, C. Chang, A. Connolly, M. Coughlin, J. Cromer, V. Cunningham, K. De, A. Delacroix, V. Desai, D. A. Duev, G. Eadie, T. L. Farnham, M. Feeney, U. Feindt, D. Flynn, A. Franckowiak, S. Frederick, C. Fremling, A. Gal-Yam, S. Gezari, M. Giomi, D. A. Goldstein, V. Z. Golkhou, A. Goobar, S. Groom, E. Hacopians, D. Hale, J. Henning, A. Y. Q. Ho, D. Hover, J. Howell, T. Hung, D. Huppenkothen, D. Imel, W. Ip, Ž. Ivezić, E. Jackson, L. Jones, M. Juric, M. M. Kasliwal, S. Kaspi, S. Kaye, M. S. P. Kelley, M. Kowalski, E. Kramer, T. Kupfer, W. Landry, R. R. Laher, C. Lee, H. W. Lin, Z. Lin, R. Lunnan, A. Mahabal, P. Mao, A. A. Miller, S. Monkewitz, P. Murphy, C. Ngeow, J. Nordin, P. Nugent, E. Ofek, M. T. Patterson, B. Penprase, M. Porter, L. Rauch, U. Rebbapragada, D. Reiley, M. Rigault, H. Rodriguez, J. van Roestel, B. Rusholme, J. van Santen, S. Schulze, D. L. Shupe, L. P. Singer, M. T. Soumagnac, R. Stein, J. Surace, J. Sollerman, P. Szkody, F. Taddia, S. Terek, A. Van Sistine, S. van Velzen, W. T. Vestrand, R. Walters, C. Ward, Q. Ye, P. Yu, L. Yan, and J. Zolkower (2019) The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. PASP 131 (995), pp. 018002. External Links: Document, 1902.01932 Cited by: §2.
  • J. Bland-Hawthorn, P. R. Maloney, R. S. Sutherland, and G. J. Madsen (2013) Fossil imprint of a powerful flare at the Galactic Centre along the Magellanic Stream. ApJ 778, pp. 58. External Links: Document, 1309.5455 Cited by: §5.3.
  • M. Boquien, D. Burgarella, Y. Roehlly, V. Buat, L. Ciesla, D. Corre, A. K. Inoue, and H. Salas (2019) CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission. A&A 622, pp. A103. External Links: Document, 1811.03094, ADS entry Cited by: §7.
  • G. Bruzual and S. Charlot (2003) Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003. MNRAS 344 (4), pp. 1000–1028. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0309134, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • D. Calzetti, L. Armus, R. C. Bohlin, A. L. Kinney, J. Koornneef, and T. Storchi-Bergmann (2000) The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-forming Galaxies. ApJ 533 (2), pp. 682–695. External Links: Document, astro-ph/9911459, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • Y. Cendes, E. Berger, K. D. Alexander, R. Chornock, R. Margutti, B. D. Metzger, M. H. Wieringa, M. F. Bietenholz, A. Hajela, T. Laskar, M. C. Stroh, and G. Terreran (2024) Ubiquitous Late Radio Emission from Tidal Disruption Events. ApJ 971 (2), pp. 185. External Links: Document, 2308.13595 Cited by: §5.5.
  • G. Chabrier (2003) Galactic Stellar and Substellar Initial Mass Function. PASP 115 (809), pp. 763–795. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0304382, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • C. T. Christy, K. D. Alexander, T. Laskar, N. Franz, A. J. Goodwin, J. Pearson, E. Berger, Y. Cendes, R. Chornock, D. Coppejans, T. Eftekhari, R. Margutti, J. C. A. Miller-Jones, M. Krips, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, D. J. Sand, R. Saxton, M. Shrestha, and S. van Velzen (2026) Dichotomy in Long-lived Radio Emission from Tidal Disruption Events AT 2020zso and AT 2021sdu: Multicomponent Outflows versus Host Contamination. ApJ 1001 (2), pp. 211. External Links: Document, 2509.14317 Cited by: §5.5.
  • E. Churazov, I. Khabibullin, G. Ponti, and R. Sunyaev (2017) Polarization and long-term variability of Sgr A* X-ray echo. MNRAS 468 (1), pp. 165–179. External Links: Document, 1612.00180 Cited by: §5.3.
  • D. A. Dale, G. Helou, G. E. Magdis, L. Armus, T. Díaz-Santos, and Y. Shi (2014) A Two-parameter Model for the Infrared/Submillimeter/Radio Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies and Active Galactic Nuclei. ApJ 784 (1), pp. 83. External Links: Document, 1402.1495, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • L. Dou, T. Wang, N. Jiang, C. Yang, J. Lyu, and H. Zhou (2016) Long Fading Mid-infrared Emission in Transient Coronal Line Emitters: Dust Echo of Tidal Disruption Flare. ApJ 832 (2), pp. 188. External Links: Document, 1605.05145 Cited by: §1.
  • B. T. Draine (2003) Interstellar Dust Grains. ARA&A 41, pp. 241–289. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0304489 Cited by: Appendix B, §3.4.
  • N. Earl, K. D. French, E. Ramirez-Ruiz, K. Auchettl, S. I. Raimundo, K. W. Davis, M. Masterson, I. Arcavi, W. Lu, V. F. Baldassare, D. A. Coulter, T. de Boer, M. R. Drout, M. R. Dout, H. Dykaar, R. J. Foley, C. Gall, H. Gao, M. E. Huber, D. O. Jones, D. Langeroodi, C. Lin, E. A. Magnier, B. Mockler, M. Shepherd, and M. E. Verrico (2025) AT 2020nov: Evidence for Disk Reprocessing in a Rare Tidal Disruption Event. ApJ 983 (1), pp. 28. External Links: Document, 2412.12991 Cited by: §5.6.
  • S. Gezari (2021) Tidal Disruption Events. ARA&A 59, pp. 21–58. External Links: Document, 2104.14580 Cited by: §1.
  • W. W. Golay, E. Berger, Y. Cendes, M. Masterson, E. Polisensky, R. L. Mutel, P. K. Blanchard, H. Kumar, R. Margutti, M. Drout, C. Panagiotou, K. De, and E. Kara (2025) Radio Emission from the Infrared Tidal Disruption Event WTP14adeqka: The First Directly Resolved Delayed Outflow from a TDE. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv:2508.16756. External Links: Document, 2508.16756 Cited by: §1, §2, §4.5, §5.5, §5.5, §5.6, item 5, §7, footnote 1.
  • A. J. Goodwin, M. Burn, G. E. Anderson, J. C. A. Miller-Jones, I. Grotova, P. Baldini, Z. Liu, A. Malyali, A. Rau, and M. Salvato (2025) A Systematic Analysis of the Radio Properties of 22 X-Ray-selected Tidal Disruption Event Candidates with the Australia Telescope Compact Array. ApJS 278 (2), pp. 36. External Links: Document, 2504.08426 Cited by: §5.5.
  • J. Guillochon and E. Ramirez-Ruiz (2013) Hydrodynamical Simulations to Determine the Feeding Rate of Black Holes by the Tidal Disruption of Stars: The Importance of the Impact Parameter and Stellar Structure. ApJ 767 (1), pp. 25. External Links: Document, 1206.2350 Cited by: Appendix B.
  • G. Helou, B. T. Soifer, and M. Rowan-Robinson (1985) Thermal infrared and nonthermal radio: remarkable correlation in disks of galaxies. ApJ 298, pp. L7–L11. External Links: Document, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • J. G. Hills (1975) Possible power source of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs. Nature 254 (5498), pp. 295–298. External Links: Document Cited by: §1.
  • A. K. Inoue (2011) Rest-frame ultraviolet-to-optical spectral characteristics of extremely metal-poor and metal-free galaxies. MNRAS 415 (3), pp. 2920–2931. External Links: Document, 1104.2400, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • I. O. Izviekova, I. B. Vavilova, O. V. Kompaniiets, O. Zamora, and R. Clavero (2026) The 2MIG isolated AGNs. 3. Optical–IR variability and dust reverberation in the NLSy1 galaxies Mrk 42 and Mrk 493. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv:2605.06517. Note: Submitted to MNRAS External Links: Document, 2605.06517 Cited by: §1.
  • N. Jiang, L. Dou, T. Wang, C. Yang, J. Lyu, and H. Zhou (2016) The WISE Detection of an Infrared Echo in Tidal Disruption Event ASASSN-14li. ApJ 828 (1), pp. L14. External Links: Document, 1605.04640 Cited by: Appendix B, §1, §3.4, §5.1.
  • N. Jiang, T. Wang, X. Hu, L. Sun, L. Dou, and L. Xiao (2021) Infrared Echoes of Optical Tidal Disruption Events: \sim1% Dust Covering Factor or Less at Subparsec Scale. ApJ 911 (1), pp. 31. External Links: Document, 2102.08044 Cited by: §1, §5.1.
  • V. E. Karachentseva, S. N. Mitronova, O. V. Melnyk, and I. D. Karachentsev (2010) Catalog of Isolated Galaxies Selected from the 2MASS Survey. Astrophysical Bulletin 65 (1), pp. 1–17. External Links: Document, 1005.3191 Cited by: §1.
  • I. Khabibullin, E. Churazov, and R. Sunyaev (2022) SRG/eROSITA view of X-ray reflection in the Central Molecular Zone: a snapshot in September–October 2019. MNRAS 509 (4), pp. 6068–6076. External Links: Document, 2111.07899 Cited by: §5.3.
  • C. S. Kochanek, B. J. Shappee, K. Z. Stanek, T. W.-S. Holoien, T. A. Thompson, J.-L. Prieto, S. Dong, J. V. Shields, D. Will, C. Britt, D. Perzanowski, and G. Pojmański (2017) The All-Sky Automated Survey for Supernovae (ASAS-SN) Light Curve Server v1.0. PASP 129 (980), pp. 104502. External Links: Document, 1706.07060 Cited by: §1.
  • S. Komossa (2015) Tidal disruption of stars by supermassive black holes: Status of observations. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 7, pp. 148–157. External Links: Document, 1505.01093 Cited by: §5.3.
  • O. V. Kompaniiets, A. A. Vasylenko, and I. B. Vavilova (2026) The 2MIG isolated AGNs ─ 2. X-ray general properties and peculiarities. MNRAS 549 (3), pp. stag1023. External Links: Document, 2506.14348, ADS entry Cited by: §1.
  • O. V. Kompaniiets (2023) Multiwavelength properties of the low-redshift isolated galaxies with active nuclei modelled with CIGALE. Space Science and Technology 29 (5), pp. 80–88. External Links: Document, 2311.12000 Cited by: §1.
  • J. A. P. Law-Smith, D. A. Coulter, J. Guillochon, B. Mockler, and E. Ramirez-Ruiz (2020a) Stellar Tidal Disruption Events with Abundances and Realistic Structures (STARS): Library of Fallback Rates. ApJ 905 (2), pp. 141. External Links: Document, 2007.10996 Cited by: Appendix B, §1, §3.4, §7.
  • J. A. P. Law-Smith, D. A. Coulter, and B. Mockler (2020b) jamielaw-smith/STARS_library v1.0.5. Zenodo. External Links: Document Cited by: Appendix B, §3.4, §7.
  • X. Lei, Q. Wu, H. Li, Y. Li, W. Lei, X. Fan, J. Wu, M. Wang, and W. Yang (2024) Simulations of the Collision between a Debris Stream and an Outer Dusty Torus: A Possible Channel for Forming a Fast-rise and Long-delay Radio Outburst in Tidal Disruption Events. ApJ 977 (1), pp. 63. External Links: Document Cited by: §5.5.
  • I. Linial, B. D. Metzger, and A. M. Beloborodov (2026) Delayed radio flares in tidal disruption events from star-disk collision outflows. arXiv e-prints. External Links: 2605.28928, Document Cited by: §5.5.
  • W. Lu, P. Kumar, and I. Evans (2016) Infrared emission from tidal disruption events – probing the pc-scale dust content around galactic nuclei. MNRAS 458 (1), pp. 575–581. External Links: Document, 1512.00020 Cited by: Appendix B, §1, §1, §3.4.
  • A. Mainzer, J. Bauer, R. M. Cutri, T. Grav, J. Masiero, R. Beck, P. Clarkson, T. Conrow, J. Dailey, P. Eisenhardt, B. Fabinsky, S. Fajardo-Acosta, J. Fowler, C. Gelino, C. Grillmair, I. Heinrichsen, M. Kendall, J. D. Kirkpatrick, F. Liu, F. Masci, H. McCallon, C. R. Nugent, M. Papin, E. Rice, D. Royer, T. Ryan, P. Sevilla, S. Sonnett, R. Stevenson, D. B. Thompson, S. Wheelock, D. Wiemer, M. Wittman, E. Wright, and L. Yan (2014) Initial Performance of the NEOWISE Reactivation Mission. ApJ 792 (1), pp. 30. External Links: Document, 1406.6025 Cited by: §1, §2.
  • F. Marin, E. Churazov, I. Khabibullin, R. Ferrazzoli, L. Di Gesu, T. Barnouin, A. Di Marco, R. Middei, A. Vikhlinin, E. Costa, P. Soffitta, F. Muleri, R. Sunyaev, W. Forman, R. Kraft, S. Bianchi, I. Donnarumma, P. Petrucci, T. Enoto, I. Agudo, L. A. Antonelli, M. Bachetti, L. Baldini, W. H. Baumgartner, R. Bellazzini, S. D. Bongiorno, R. Bonino, A. Brez, N. Bucciantini, F. Capitanio, S. Castellano, E. Cavazzuti, C. Chen, S. Ciprini, A. De Rosa, E. Del Monte, N. Di Lalla, V. Doroshenko, M. Dovčiak, S. R. Ehlert, Y. Evangelista, S. Fabiani, J. A. Garcia, S. Gunji, K. Hayashida, J. Heyl, A. Ingram, W. Iwakiri, S. G. Jorstad, P. Kaaret, V. Karas, T. Kitaguchi, J. J. Kolodziejczak, H. Krawczynski, F. La Monaca, L. Latronico, I. Liodakis, S. Maldera, A. Manfreda, A. Marinucci, A. P. Marscher, H. L. Marshall, F. Massaro, G. Matt, I. Mitsuishi, T. Mizuno, M. Negro, C.-Y. Ng, S. L. O’Dell, N. Omodei, C. Oppedisano, A. Papitto, G. G. Pavlov, A. L. Peirson, M. Perri, M. Pesce-Rollins, M. Pilia, A. Possenti, J. Poutanen, S. Puccetti, B. D. Ramsey, J. Rankin, A. Ratheesh, O. J. Roberts, R. W. Romani, C. Sgrò, P. Slane, G. Spandre, D. Swartz, T. Tamagawa, F. Tavecchio, R. Taverna, Y. Tawara, A. F. Tennant, N. E. Thomas, F. Tombesi, A. Trois, S. S. Tsygankov, R. Turolla, J. Vink, M. C. Weisskopf, K. Wu, F. Xie, and S. Zane (2023) X-ray polarization evidence for a 200-year-old flare of Sgr A*. Nature 619 (7968), pp. 41–45. External Links: Document, 2304.06967 Cited by: §5.3.
  • M. Masterson, K. De, C. Panagiotou, E. Kara, I. Arcavi, A. Eilers, D. Frostig, S. Gezari, I. Grotova, Z. Liu, A. Malyali, A. M. Meisner, A. Merloni, M. Newsome, A. Rau, R. A. Simcoe, and S. van Velzen (2024) A New Population of Mid-infrared-selected Tidal Disruption Events: Implications for Tidal Disruption Event Rates and Host Galaxy Properties. ApJ 961 (2), pp. 211. External Links: Document, 2401.01403 Cited by: §1, §1, §1, §2, §5.1, footnote 1.
  • A. Meiksin (2006) Colour corrections for high-redshift objects due to intergalactic attenuation. MNRAS 365 (3), pp. 807–812. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0510302, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • B. D. Metzger and N. C. Stone (2016) A bright year for tidal disruptions. MNRAS 461 (1), pp. 948–966. External Links: Document, 1506.03453, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • J. Necker, E. Graikou, M. Kowalski, A. Franckowiak, J. Nordin, T. Pernice, S. van Velzen, and P. M. Veres (2025) Flaires: A Comprehensive Catalog of Dust-Echo-like Infrared Flares. A&A 695, pp. A228. External Links: Document, 2407.01039 Cited by: §1, §1, §2, §5.1, footnote 1.
  • M. Nenkova, M. M. Sirocky, Ž. Ivezić, and M. Elitzur (2008) AGN Dusty Tori. I. Handling of Clumpy Media. ApJ 685 (1), pp. 147–159. External Links: Document, 0806.0511, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • T. Piran, A. Sadowski, and A. Tchekhovskoy (2015) “Circularization” vs. accretion – what powers tidal disruption events?. MNRAS 453 (1), pp. 157–165. External Links: Document, 1501.02015, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • P. Predehl, R. A. Sunyaev, W. Becker, H. Brunner, R. Burenin, A. Bykov, A. Cherepashchuk, N. Chugai, E. Churazov, V. Doroshenko, N. Eismont, M. Freyberg, M. Gilfanov, F. Haberl, I. Khabibullin, R. Krivonos, C. Maitra, P. Medvedev, A. Merloni, K. Nandra, V. Nazarov, M. Pavlinsky, G. Ponti, J. S. Sanders, M. Sasaki, S. Sazonov, A. W. Strong, and J. Wilms (2020) Detection of large-scale X-ray bubbles in the Milky Way halo. Nature 588 (7837), pp. 227–231. External Links: Document, 2012.05840 Cited by: §5.3.
  • N. G. Pulatova, I. B. Vavilova, U. Sawangwit, Iu. Babyk, and S. Klimanov (2015) The 2MIG isolated AGNs – I. General and multiwavelength properties of AGNs and host galaxies in the northern sky. MNRAS 447 (3), pp. 2209–2223. External Links: Document Cited by: §1, footnote 1.
  • N. G. Pulatova, I. B. Vavilova, A. A. Vasylenko, and O. M. Ulyanov (2023) Radio Properties of the Low-Redshift Isolated Galaxies with Active Nuclei. Kinematics and Physics of Celestial Bodies 39 (2), pp. 98–115. External Links: Document Cited by: §1.
  • M. J. Rees (1988) Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 106–108 solar masses in nearby galaxies. Nature 333 (6173), pp. 523–528. External Links: Document Cited by: Appendix B, §1.
  • M. G. Revnivtsev, E. M. Churazov, S. Yu. Sazonov, R. A. Sunyaev, A. A. Lutovinov, M. R. Gilfanov, A. A. Vikhlinin, P. E. Shtykovsky, and M. N. Pavlinsky (2004) Hard X-ray view of the past activity of Sgr A* in a natural Compton mirror. A&A 425, pp. L49–L52. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0408190 Cited by: §5.3.
  • T. M. Reynolds, S. Mattila, A. Efstathiou, E. Kankare, E. C. Kool, S. Ryder, L. Peña-Moñino, and M. A. Pérez-Torres (2022) Energetic nuclear transients in luminous and ultraluminous infrared galaxies. A&A 664, pp. A158. External Links: Document, 2202.04019 Cited by: §1.
  • T. M. Reynolds, L. Thomsen, S. Mattila, T. Nagao, J. P. Anderson, F. E. Bauer, P. Charalampopoulos, L. Dai, S. Faris, M. Gromadzki, C. P. Gutiérrez, H. Kuncarayakti, C. Inserra, E. Kankare, T. Kravtsov, S. Moran, and P. Wiseman (2026) Infrared observations reveal the reprocessing envelope in the tidal disruption event AT 2019azh. A&A 708, pp. A139. External Links: Document, 2506.18489 Cited by: §1.
  • N. Roth, E. M. Rossi, J. Krolik, T. Piran, B. Mockler, and D. Kasen (2020a) Radiative Emission Mechanisms. Space Sci. Rev. 216 (7), pp. 114. External Links: Document, 2008.01117, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • N. Roth, E. M. Rossi, J. Krolik, T. Piran, B. Mockler, and D. Kasen (2020b) Radiative Emission Mechanisms. Space Sci. Rev. 216 (7), pp. 114. External Links: Document, 2008.01117 Cited by: §5.4, §5.5.
  • S. Sazonov and R. Sunyaev (2012) Past activity of Sgr A* inferred from X-ray echoes in the Galactic Center. European Physical Journal Web of Conferences 39, pp. 02001. External Links: Document Cited by: §5.3.
  • G. Schwarz (1978) Estimating the Dimension of a Model. Annals of Statistics 6 (2), pp. 461–464. External Links: Document Cited by: §3.4.
  • H. Shiokawa, J. H. Krolik, R. M. Cheng, T. Piran, and S. C. Noble (2015) General Relativistic Hydrodynamic Simulation of Accretion Flow from a Stellar Tidal Disruption. ApJ 804 (2), pp. 85. External Links: Document, 1501.04365, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • M. Stalevski, J. Fritz, M. Baes, T. Nakos, and L. Č. Popović (2012) AGN dusty tori as a clumpy two-phase medium: the 10 micron silicate feature. MNRAS 420 (3), pp. 2756–2772. External Links: Document, 1112.0570, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix B.
  • M. Su, T. R. Slatyer, and D. P. Finkbeiner (2010) Giant Gamma-ray Bubbles from Fermi-LAT: Active Galactic Nucleus Activity or Bipolar Galactic Wind?. ApJ 724 (2), pp. 1044–1082. External Links: Document, 1005.5480 Cited by: §5.3.
  • J. L. Tonry, L. Denneau, A. N. Heinze, B. Stalder, K. W. Smith, S. J. Smartt, C. W. Stubbs, H. J. Weiland, and A. Rest (2018) ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. PASP 130 (988), pp. 064505. External Links: Document, 1802.00879 Cited by: §1.
  • K. Uno, K. Maeda, T. Nagao, G. Leloudas, P. Charalampopoulos, S. Mattila, K. Aoki, K. Taguchi, M. Kawabata, J. Moldon, M. Pérez-Torres, M. Pursiainen, and T. Reynolds (2025) Spectropolarimetry of a Nuclear Transient AT2023clx: Revealing the Geometrical Alignment between the Transient Outflow and the Nuclear Dusty Region. ApJ 986 (2), pp. L23. External Links: Document, 2503.19024 Cited by: §1.
  • S. van Velzen, A. J. Mendez, J. H. Krolik, and V. Gorjian (2016) Discovery of Transient Infrared Emission from Dust Heated by Stellar Tidal Disruption Flares. ApJ 829 (1), pp. 19. External Links: Document, 1603.07733 Cited by: Appendix B, §1, §3.4.
  • S. van Velzen, D. R. Pasham, S. Komossa, L. Yan, and E. A. Kara (2021) Reverberation in Tidal Disruption Events: Dust Echoes, Coronal Emission Lines, Multi-wavelength Cross-correlations, and QPOs. Space Sci. Rev. 217 (5), pp. 63. External Links: Document, 2107.02802 Cited by: Appendix B, §1, §1, §3.4.
  • I. B. Vavilova, A. M. Dmytrenko, D. V. Dobrycheva, P. N. Fedorov, I. O. Izviekova, V. P. Khramtsov, O. V. Kompaniiets, O. N. Kukhar, O. S. Pastoven, O. Sergijenko, and A. A. Vasylenko (2026) Milky Way Near Twins (MWNeTs). I. A Hierarchical Framework for Identifying the Evolutionary Counterparts of the Milky Way. arXiv e-prints, pp. arXiv:2607.08336. External Links: 2607.08336, ADS entry Cited by: §5.3.
  • I. B. Vavilova, O. V. Melnyk, and A. A. Elyiv (2009) Morphological properties of isolated galaxies versus isolation criteria. Astronomische Nachrichten 330 (10), pp. 1004–1009. External Links: Document Cited by: §1.
  • T. Wang, L. Yan, L. Dou, N. Jiang, Z. Sheng, and C. Yang (2018) Long-term Decline of the Mid-infrared Emission of Normal Galaxies: Dust Echo of Tidal Disruption Flare?. MNRAS 477 (3), pp. 2943–2965. External Links: Document, 1802.05105 Cited by: §1.
  • E. L. Wright, P. R. M. Eisenhardt, A. K. Mainzer, M. E. Ressler, R. M. Cutri, T. Jarrett, J. D. Kirkpatrick, D. Padgett, R. S. McMillan, M. Skrutskie, S. A. Stanford, M. Cohen, R. G. Walker, J. C. Mather, D. Leisawitz, I. Gautier, I. McLean, D. Benford, C. J. Lonsdale, A. Blain, B. Mendez, W. R. Irace, V. Duval, F. Liu, D. Royer, I. Heinrichsen, J. Howard, M. Shannon, M. Kendall, A. L. Walsh, M. Larsen, J. G. Cardon, S. Schick, M. Schwalm, M. Abid, B. Fabinsky, L. Naes, and C. Tsai (2010) The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance. AJ 140 (6), pp. 1868–1881. External Links: Document, 1008.0031 Cited by: §1, §2.
  • M. Wu, N. Jiang, J. Zhu, D. Luo, L. Dou, and T. Wang (2025) A Torus Remnant Revealed by the Infrared Echo of Tidal Disruption Event AT 2019qiz: Implications for the Missing Energy and Quasiperiodic Eruption Formation. ApJ 988, pp. L77. External Links: Document, 2507.13251 Cited by: §1, §5.6.
  • Q. Yang, Y. Shen, X. Liu, X. Wu, L. Jiang, J. Shangguan, M. J. Graham, and S. Yao (2019) An Unusual Mid-infrared Flare in a Type 2 AGN: An Obscured Turning-on AGN or Tidal Disruption Event?. ApJ 885 (2), pp. 110. External Links: Document, 1907.12721 Cited by: §1.
  • Y. Yao, J. Ye, L. Sun, N. Jiang, M. Masterson, and X. Shu (2025) Distinguishing Tidal Disruption Events and Changing-look Active Galactic Nuclei via Variation of Mid-infrared Color. ApJS 281, pp. 7. External Links: Document, 2503.10053 Cited by: §1, §1.
  • D. York, N. M. Evensen, M. L. Martínez, and J. De Basabe Delgado (2004) Unified Equations for the Slope, Intercept, and Standard Errors of the Best Straight Line. American Journal of Physics 72 (3), pp. 367–375. External Links: Document Cited by: §3.2.
  • M. S. Yun, N. A. Reddy, and J. J. Condon (2001) Radio Properties of Infrared-selected Galaxies in the IRAS 2 Jy Sample. ApJ 554 (2), pp. 803–822. External Links: Document, astro-ph/0102154, ADS entry Cited by: Appendix G.
  • Z. Zhang, X. Shu, L. Yang, L. Sun, H. Ding, L. Yan, N. Jiang, F. An, W. Silima, F. Zhang, Y. Chandola, Z. Wu, D. Liu, L. Dou, J. Wang, Y. Wang, C. Yang, D. Li, T. Zhou, W. Zhang, F. Peng, and T. Wang (2026) Discovery of a Years-delayed Radio Flare from an Unusually Slowly Evolving Tidal Disruption Event Candidate. ApJ 997 (1), pp. 9. External Links: Document, 2501.08812 Cited by: §5.5.

Appendix A Smooth phenomenological component model

The quantities defined in this appendix are effective diagnostics of the MIR response and provide descriptive constraints on the WISE light-curve morphology.

The smooth W1+W2W1+W2 phenomenological model used in Sect. 3.4 was fitted to the baseline-subtracted WISE excess light curves. For each component ii, the W2W2 excess flux was written as

ΔFW2,i(t)=AiPi(t),\Delta F_{W2,i}(t)=A_{i}\,P_{i}(t), (16)

where AiA_{i} is the W2W2 excess amplitude and Pi(t)P_{i}(t) is a temporal profile normalised to unity at its peak. The corresponding W1W1 excess flux was tied to the same temporal profile through the temperature-dependent Planck ratio,

ΔFW1,i(t)=AiBν(νW1,rest,Ti)Bν(νW2,rest,Ti)Pi(t).\Delta F_{W1,i}(t)=A_{i}\frac{B_{\nu}(\nu_{W1,{\rm rest}},T_{i})}{B_{\nu}(\nu_{W2,{\rm rest}},T_{i})}P_{i}(t). (17)

We adopted a smooth asymmetric Gaussian profile to provide a continuous description of the sparsely sampled WISE light curves,

Pi(t)={exp[12(ttpeak,iσrise,i)2],ttpeak,i,exp[12(ttpeak,iσdecay,i)2],t>tpeak,i.P_{i}(t)=\begin{cases}\exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{t-t_{{\rm peak},i}}{\sigma_{{\rm rise},i}}\right)^{2}\right],&t\leq t_{{\rm peak},i},\\[4.0pt] \exp\left[-\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{t-t_{{\rm peak},i}}{\sigma_{{\rm decay},i}}\right)^{2}\right],&t>t_{{\rm peak},i}.\end{cases} (18)

The total model in each band was the sum of all components,

ΔFν(t)=iΔFν,i(t).\Delta F_{\nu}(t)=\sum_{i}\Delta F_{\nu,i}(t). (19)

Because the quiescent MIR level had already been removed through the adopted baseline subtraction, the component model contains no additional constant background term.

Appendix B Hydro-clumpy model implementation

The hydro-clumpy calculations test whether the observed phase-dependent W1W1 and W2W2 behaviour can be reproduced within physically plausible dust-response scenarios driven by tidal disruption events (TDEs). The aim is to connect the empirical WISE diagnostics with representative structured dust-response models. Only two WISE bands are available, so degeneracies remain between the input luminosity history, accretion/circularisation smoothing, and the dust distribution. The models are therefore interpreted as physical consistency tests for the observed MIR behaviour.

We used clumpy dust-echo models based on hydrodynamical TDE fallback curves to check physical consistency with the empirical WISE diagnostics discussed in Sect. 3. The input fallback histories were taken from the STARS fallback-rate library (Law-Smith et al. 2020a, b), which provides hydrodynamical fallback-rate calculations for disruptions of main-sequence stars with realistic stellar structures. This choice is motivated by the standard TDE picture in which a fraction of the disrupted stellar debris remains bound and returns to the black hole, providing the mass-supply history of the event (e.g. Rees 1988; Guillochon and Ramirez-Ruiz 2013).

These fallback curves were used as input drivers for the dust-response calculation. First, each curve was broadened using an effective accretion/circularisation smoothing timescale. It was then converted into a luminosity input that illuminated a clumpy, radially stratified dust distribution. This smoothing accounts for the fact that the observed radiative output of a TDE may be broadened or reshaped by stream self-intersection, inefficient or delayed circularisation, shocks in eccentric debris, outflows, and viscous accretion delays (e.g. Piran et al. 2015; Shiokawa et al. 2015; Metzger and Stone 2016; Roth et al. 2020a).

The luminosity scale was treated as a discrete model parameter in the hydro-clumpy grid. For the fiducial best-ranked solution, the selected normalisation corresponds to an effective bolometric input energy of Einput=2.44×1052ergE_{\rm input}=2.44\times 10^{52}\ {\rm erg}. This value is the best-grid luminosity normalisation required by the adopted dust-response model to reproduce the observed WISE excess.

If this input energy is powered by accretion with radiative efficiency ηrad\eta_{\rm rad}, the corresponding accreted-mass scale is

Macc=Einputηradc20.136(0.1ηrad)(Einput2.44×1052erg)M.M_{\rm acc}=\frac{E_{\rm input}}{\eta_{\rm rad}c^{2}}\simeq 0.136\left(\frac{0.1}{\eta_{\rm rad}}\right)\left(\frac{E_{\rm input}}{2.44\times 10^{52}\ {\rm erg}}\right)M_{\odot}.

For ηrad=0.050.2\eta_{\rm rad}=0.05{-}0.2, this corresponds to Macc0.070.27MM_{\rm acc}\simeq 0.07{-}0.27\,M_{\odot}. These values are order-of-magnitude energy-budget consistency checks, because the inferred normalisation remains degenerate with the dust covering factor, geometry, temperature distribution, and reprocessing efficiency.

The dust response was treated as an infrared echo, in which radiation from the nuclear transient is absorbed by circumnuclear dust and re-emitted at infrared wavelengths after geometry-dependent light-travel-time delays (e.g. Lu et al. 2016; Jiang et al. 2016; van Velzen et al. 2016, 2021). We represented the dust distribution using a Monte Carlo ensemble of clumps in temperature zones and examined both two-zone and three-zone responses. This clumpy prescription is phenomenological. It is motivated by the broader picture that nuclear dust can be inhomogeneous and radially structured (e.g. Nenkova et al. 2008; Stalevski et al. 2012). Each clump was assigned a delay, response weight, and temperature scale. The delayed W1W1 and W2W2 emission was then computed using a modified-blackbody prescription, following standard dust emission physics (e.g. Draine 2003). This approach accounts for light-travel-time delays and temperature stratification and is used to test whether a structured dust response can reproduce the empirical WISE diagnostics.

The objective function combines two complementary requirements: (i) reproduction of the W1W1 and W2W2 light curves and (ii) reproduction of model-independent WISE diagnostics. It therefore ranks models according to their ability to reproduce both the broad WISE light-curve envelope and the phase-dependent W1W1W2W2 behaviour. Similar light curves can arise from different dust-response configurations, so the objective function also includes diagnostics beyond the point-by-point W1+W2W1+W2 light-curve residuals:

𝒬=χLC2Ndata+wτδτ2+wΦδΦ2+wσδσ2+wffδff2,\mathcal{Q}=\frac{\chi^{2}_{\rm LC}}{N_{\rm data}}+w_{\tau}\delta_{\tau}^{2}+w_{\Phi}\delta_{\Phi}^{2}+w_{\sigma}\delta_{\sigma}^{2}+w_{\rm ff}\delta_{\rm ff}^{2}, (20)

where

δτ\displaystyle\delta_{\tau} =ΔtcentmodelΔtcentobsσΔt,\displaystyle=\frac{\Delta t_{\rm cent}^{\rm model}-\Delta t_{\rm cent}^{\rm obs}}{\sigma_{\Delta t}}, (21)
δΦ\displaystyle\delta_{\Phi} =(ΦW2/ΦW1)model(ΦW2/ΦW1)obsσΦ,\displaystyle=\frac{(\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1})_{\rm model}-(\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1})_{\rm obs}}{\sigma_{\Phi}}, (22)
δσ\displaystyle\delta_{\sigma} =(σt,W2/σt,W1)model(σt,W2/σt,W1)obsσσ,\displaystyle=\frac{(\sigma_{t,W2}/\sigma_{t,W1})_{\rm model}-(\sigma_{t,W2}/\sigma_{t,W1})_{\rm obs}}{\sigma_{\sigma}}, (23)
δff\displaystyle\delta_{\rm ff} =mffmodelmffobsσm.\displaystyle=\frac{m_{\rm ff}^{\rm model}-m_{\rm ff}^{\rm obs}}{\sigma_{m}}. (24)

Here Δtcent\Delta t_{\rm cent} is the W2W2W1W1 positive-fluence centroid offset, ΦW2/ΦW1\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1} is the W2W2-to-W1W1 positive-fluence ratio, σt,W2/σt,W1\sigma_{t,W2}/\sigma_{t,W1} is the W2W2-to-W1W1 temporal-width ratio, and mffm_{\rm ff} is the global W2W2-versus-W1W1 flux–flux slope.

These quantities are largely model-independent and provide complementary constraints on the phase-dependent dust response beyond the point-by-point light-curve residuals. Figure 10 shows the hydrodynamical fallback curve and smoothed accretion-powered luminosity driver for the fiducial hydro-clumpy model, labelled Case B in Table 6. Figure 11 compares this model with the observed WISE flux–flux trajectory. These figures illustrate the adopted forward-model construction and the resulting W1W1W2W2 behaviour; the dust geometry is interpreted at the level of an effective structured response.

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Hydrodynamical fallback input and smoothed accretion-powered luminosity driver used in the fiducial hydro-clumpy dust-echo model. The left panel shows the STARS hydrodynamical fallback-rate curve adopted as the input mass-supply history. The right panel shows the corresponding smoothed luminosity input after applying the effective circularisation/viscous smoothing. This driver is used as the luminosity input for the dust response.
Refer to caption
Figure 11: Model flux–flux trajectory for the fiducial hydro-clumpy dust-echo model, compared with the observed WISE excess fluxes. The model reproduces the qualitative hysteresis-like behaviour in which the declining branch remains enhanced in W2W2 relative to W1W1. This comparison provides an additional diagnostic of the phase-dependent dust response traced by the W1W1W2W2 flux–flux behaviour.

The hydro-clumpy calculations and the phenomenological decomposition serve different roles. The phenomenological models quantify the degree of complexity required by the WISE data. The hydro-clumpy models test whether this complexity can be reproduced within physically plausible TDE-driven dust scenarios. Thus, the hydro-clumpy calculations link the empirical WISE diagnostics to representative structured dust-response models.

Appendix C Auxiliary optical checks

The available ZTF observations start after the main MIR rise and maximum of UGC 11487 and therefore cannot reconstruct the primary optical/UV flare or measure an optical–MIR lag. We use them only as a post-flare comparison dataset. Figure 12 shows the grg-r colour–magnitude relation, while Table 8 summarises the colour and flux–flux checks.

The grg-r trend is significant, whereas the rir-i and flux–flux trends are weaker. Because the optical variability is small and likely host-dominated, these diagnostics are not used as physical constraints on the MIR flare.

Refer to caption
Figure 12: Post-flare ZTF grg-r colour–magnitude relation for UGC 11487 using the 33\arcsec seeing cut. The ZTF data start after the main MIR rise and maximum.
Table 8: Post-flare ZTF colour and flux–flux diagnostics using a 33\arcsec seeing cut.
Diagnostic NN Slope rr
grg-r vs gg 600 0.798±0.0450.798\pm 0.045 0.585
rir-i vs rr 112 0.730±0.1150.730\pm 0.115 0.552
ΔFg\Delta F_{g} vs ΔFr\Delta F_{r} 523 0.115±0.0260.115\pm 0.026 0.249
ΔFr\Delta F_{r} vs ΔFi\Delta F_{i} 101 0.022±0.0660.022\pm 0.066 0.135

Appendix D Phenomenological response and component-model tests

As an additional diagnostic, we fitted simple W1W1-to-W2W2 toy transfer functions in which the W1W1 excess was used as a proxy driver for the W2W2 excess. This test was used to assess the range of internal WISE response timescales. The Monte Carlo shift-and-broaden analysis used in the main text gives a compact effective shift of τ110±20\tau\simeq 110\pm 20 d, corresponding to cτ0.092±0.017c\tau\simeq 0.092\pm 0.017 pc. The broader toy transfer-function tests give mean delays of 100100–160 d, equivalent to light-travel scales of cτ0.08c\langle\tau\rangle\simeq 0.08–0.13 pc. The broad radial shell gives the lowest BIC, but several response functions reproduce the W2W2 morphology with comparable quality (Table 9).

Table 9: Diagnostic toy W1W1-to-W2W2 transfer-function fits. The W1W1 excess is used only as a proxy driver for the W2W2 excess.333The models are diagnostic tests of response-timescale degeneracy and are used as empirical response-shape comparisons.
Model kk ΔBIC\Delta{\rm BIC} τ\langle\tau\rangle cτc\langle\tau\rangle
d pc
Broad radial shell 5 0.0 158 0.132
Thin spherical shell 3 3.4 101 0.084
Gaussian response 4 4.7 104 0.088
Inclined thin ring 4 5.7 105 0.088
Top-hat response 4 6.4 101 0.084

Figure 13 shows the smooth one-, two-, and three-component W1+W2W1+W2 phenomenological fits to the baseline-subtracted WISE excess light curves. The one-component model does not reproduce the full W1+W2W1+W2 morphology. The two-component model gives the preferred compact description for the adopted effective-error treatment, while the three-component model is included as a diagnostic of the marginal late W2W2 shoulder.

Refer to caption
Figure 13: Smooth phenomenological W1+W2W1+W2 component fits to the baseline-subtracted WISE excess light curves. The three-component model follows the marginal late W2W2 shoulder more closely, but is disfavoured by BIC for the adopted effective error floor. It is included as a diagnostic of possible late-time residual structure. Dotted curves show the hot and warm components of the preferred two-component phenomenological model.

Table 10 gives the Monte Carlo parameter estimates for the preferred smooth two-component phenomenological model. These parameters describe an effective two-band MIR decomposition.

Table 10: Monte Carlo parameter estimates for the preferred smooth two-component W1+W2W1+W2 phenomenological model.444Values are the median parameters from Monte Carlo refitting, with uncertainties given by the 16th–84th percentile range. AW2A_{W2} denotes the peak W2W2 excess amplitude of each component. Times are rest-frame days since the first NEOWISE epoch. The warm-component σrise\sigma_{\rm rise} reaches the imposed lower bound and is therefore a smoothing-scale diagnostic with limited rise-time interpretation.
Parameter Hot component Warm component
AW2A_{W2} 26.52.6+2.426.5^{+2.4}_{-2.6} mJy 16.1±1.016.1\pm 1.0 mJy
TT 878±46878\pm 46 K 52429+31524^{+31}_{-29} K
tpeakt_{\rm peak} 104319+171043^{+17}_{-19} d 131770+861317^{+86}_{-70} d
σrise\sigma_{\rm rise} 31519+23315^{+23}_{-19} d 2500+5250^{+5}_{-0} d
σdecay\sigma_{\rm decay} 3099+26309^{+26}_{-9} d 132878+941328^{+94}_{-78} d
Bν(W1)/Bν(W2)B_{\nu}(W1)/B_{\nu}(W2) 0.6750.044+0.0420.675^{+0.042}_{-0.044} 0.2890.034+0.0360.289^{+0.036}_{-0.034}

Appendix E Robustness and auxiliary checks

Table 11 shows how the model-independent W1W1W2W2 timing and fluence diagnostics depend on the adopted pre-flare baseline. The numerical centroid scale changes with the baseline choice, but W2W2 remains delayed and has a larger positive fluence than W1W1 in all cases. The AllWISE 2010 points were used only to define and resample the pre-flare baseline and were excluded from the flare fluence or energy integrations.

The possible late-time W2W2 shoulder was assessed with a simple local residual test. We fitted the post-peak W2W2 decline with a smooth exponential profile after excluding epochs 17–19, which correspond to the tentative late-time W2W2 excess in Fig. 1:

ΔF(t)=C+Aexp[(ttref)/τd].\Delta F(t)=C+A\exp[-(t-t_{\rm ref})/\tau_{\rm d}].

The significance of the excluded epochs was estimated from their residuals relative to this smooth-decline model, using the effective photometric uncertainties and the scatter of the fitted decline. This test quantifies the late W2W2 excess relative to a smooth post-peak decay.

Table 11: Baseline sensitivity of the W1W1W2W2 timing and fluence diagnostics. Centroid offsets are rest-frame values.555The fiducial main-text value, Δtcent=224±45\Delta t_{\rm cent}=224\pm 45 d and cΔtcent=0.188±0.038c\Delta t_{\rm cent}=0.188\pm 0.038 pc, comes from the Monte Carlo calculation in which the combined baseline is bootstrapped. The fixed combined-baseline value listed here is an auxiliary baseline-sensitivity quantity.
Baseline FW1,0F_{W1,0} FW2,0F_{W2,0} Δtcent\Delta t_{\rm cent} cΔtcentc\Delta t_{\rm cent} ΦW2/ΦW1\Phi_{W2}/\Phi_{W1}
mJy mJy d pc
NEOWISE 0–1 8.072 5.215 206.6 0.173 2.16
AllWISE+NEOWISE 8.453 5.428 233.8 0.196 2.25
AllWISE 2010 only 8.786 5.672 256.6 0.215 2.33

Table 12 shows the dependence of the smooth component comparison on the adopted effective error floor. The one-component model remains strongly disfavoured for all tested floors. The three-component model is preferred only for the lowest tested value, σfloor=0.50mJy\sigma_{\rm floor}=0.50\penalty 10000\ {\rm mJy}, where small residuals, including the possible late W2W2 shoulder, receive greater statistical weight.

Table 12: Sensitivity of the smooth W1+W2W1+W2 component comparison to the effective error floor. ΔBIC12\Delta{\rm BIC}_{1-2} and ΔBIC32\Delta{\rm BIC}_{3-2} are relative to the two-component model.666The adopted analysis uses σfloor=1.10\sigma_{\rm floor}=1.10 mJy. The one-component model is always strongly disfavoured; the two- versus three-component distinction is sensitive only at the smallest tested floor.
σfloor\sigma_{\rm floor} χν,12\chi^{2}_{\nu,1} χν,22\chi^{2}_{\nu,2} χν,32\chi^{2}_{\nu,3} ΔBIC12\Delta{\rm BIC}_{1-2} ΔBIC32\Delta{\rm BIC}_{3-2} BIC pref.
mJy
0.50 39.40 2.97 2.41 1416.6 -12.1 3 comp.
0.80 15.55 1.17 0.95 548.0 6.7 2 comp.
1.10 8.25 0.62 0.50 281.7 12.7 2 comp.
1.50 4.45 0.33 0.27 143.1 15.4 2 comp.
2.00 2.50 0.19 0.15 72.3 17.0 2 comp.

Table 13 lists the illustrative travel-time velocities used for the MIR–radio comparison discussed in Sect. 4.5. These estimates provide an auxiliary scale comparison between the MIR dust-response diagnostics and the radio-emitting region.

Table 13: Illustrative MIR–radio travel-time comparison. The values give the characteristic outflow velocity required for a hypothetical outflow launched at the adopted MIR reference epoch to reach a scale RR by the listed radio or late-MIR epoch. The reference date is the onset of the positive MIR excess, taken as WISE epoch 2 (MJD57008{\rm MJD}\simeq 57008). The compact W1W1-to-W2W2 shift scale comes from the shift-and-broaden analysis, the W2W2W1W1 centroid scale is the preferred positive-fluence centroid scale, and the effective slow scale characterises the broader model-dependent dust-response component. These estimates provide an illustrative comparison between the MIR dust-response scales and the radio-emitting region.
Reference event Compact shift W2W2W1W1 centroid Effective slow Literature shell
R=0.092R=0.092 pc R=0.188R=0.188 pc R=0.214R=0.214 pc R=0.33R=0.33 pc
First radio detection βreq0.076\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.076 0.15\sim 0.15 0.18\sim 0.18 0.27\sim 0.27
Radio bright epoch βreq0.046\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.046 0.10\sim 0.10 0.11\sim 0.11 0.16\sim 0.16
W2W2 late-shoulder midpoint βreq0.040\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.040 0.082\sim 0.082 0.094\sim 0.094 0.15\sim 0.15
VLBA epoch 1 βreq0.035\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.035 0.071\sim 0.071 0.082\sim 0.082 0.13\sim 0.13
VLBA epoch 2 βreq0.031\beta_{\rm req}\sim 0.031 0.064\sim 0.064 0.073\sim 0.073 0.11\sim 0.11

Appendix F Aperture-matched host-galaxy photometry and SED modelling

To characterise the time-averaged host-galaxy emission of UGC 11487, we performed aperture-matched photometry using archival GALEX, Pan-STARRS1, 2MASS, WISE, IRAS, and NVSS data. The purpose of this analysis is to provide the host-galaxy context for the MIR flare. The resulting UV–radio SED was used to estimate the stellar mass, star formation rate, dust attenuation, dust luminosity, and possible time-averaged broadband AGN contribution of the host galaxy.

For the UV, optical, near-infrared, and WISE W1W1W2W2 bands, we adopted a common full-galaxy elliptical aperture centred on UGC 11487, with semi-major axis a=45a=45\arcsec, semi-minor axis b=30b=30\arcsec, and position angle PA=40PA=40^{\circ}. This aperture encloses the main optical body of the galaxy while limiting the contribution from the surrounding background. For the lower-resolution WISE W3 and W4 images, we used circular apertures with radii of 5050\arcsec and 5555\arcsec, respectively. The NVSS 1.4 GHz flux density was measured with a circular aperture of radius 6565\arcsec, appropriate for the NVSS beam size.

A local background was estimated and subtracted in each band before aperture summation. A reference contaminant mask was constructed from the Pan-STARRS1 rr-band image and reprojected to the Pan-STARRS1 g,r,ig,r,i, 2MASS J,H,KsJ,H,K_{s}, and WISE W1–W3 images. The mask was dilated according to the band-dependent point-spread function. Masked pixels inside the aperture were replaced by a smooth local estimate before the final aperture summation. No contaminant mask was applied to GALEX FUV/NUV, WISE W4, or NVSS because of the lower angular resolution and the different morphology of the diffuse emission.

The aperture sums were converted to flux densities using the appropriate survey calibrations: AB calibrations for GALEX and Pan-STARRS1, Vega zero-points for 2MASS and WISE where required, surface-brightness conversion for images in MJy sr-1, and beam-aware conversion for NVSS maps in Jy beam-1. The UV, optical, and near-infrared fluxes were corrected for Galactic foreground extinction using E(BV)=0.0643E(B-V)=0.0643 and a standard RV=3.1R_{V}=3.1 extinction curve. All final broadband flux densities and uncertainties were converted to mJy before being used in the SED modelling.

The Pan-STARRS1 yy-band measurement was excluded from the final SED fit. An aperture-growth diagnostic showed an anomalously high y/iy/i flux ratio, Fy/Fi4.9F_{y}/F_{i}\simeq 4.9, at the adopted aperture, inconsistent with the smoother behaviour of the r/gr/g and i/ri/r ratios. We therefore treated the yy-band flux as affected by calibration, background, or large-scale image-structure systematics.

IRAS photometry was treated separately because of the poorer angular resolution and the strong cirrus/confusion background at the position of UGC 11487. For the 12, 25, 60, and 100 μm\mu{\rm m} maps, we used beam-aware circular-aperture photometry in MJy sr-1 images with local annular background subtraction. The uncertainty was estimated empirically from random apertures in the surrounding field. The 12, 25, and 60 μm\mu{\rm m} measurements had low or negative random-aperture significance and were therefore used as conservative 3σ3\sigma upper limits. The 100 μm\mu{\rm m} point was retained as a marginal far-infrared constraint with S/N3.3{\rm S/N}\simeq 3.3.

The resulting broadband SED was modelled with CIGALE. The fit used the aperture-matched UV–radio photometry to describe the time-averaged host-galaxy emission. The WISE W1 and W2 points used in this SED fit represent the integrated host-galaxy flux level and were excluded from the time-dependent MIR flare modelling. The SED modelling was used to constrain the persistent stellar, star-forming, dust, and possible AGN components of UGC 11487. The best-fitting SED and the derived host-galaxy parameters are presented in Sect. 4.6.

Refer to caption

(a) GALEX NUV

Refer to caption

(b) Pan-STARRS1 ii-band

Refer to caption

(c) WISE W1

Refer to caption

(d) NVSS 1.4 GHz

Figure 14: Examples of multiwavelength images used to validate the aperture-matched host-galaxy photometry of UGC 11487: (a) GALEX NUV, (b) Pan-STARRS1 ii-band, (c) WISE W1, and (d) NVSS 1.4 GHz. All panels show a 190×190190\arcsec\times 190\arcsec field centred on the galaxy. The red contour marks the aperture used for the corresponding integrated flux measurement: the common full-galaxy elliptical aperture for the UV, optical, and WISE W1 images, and the circular low-resolution aperture for the NVSS map. White regions inside the aperture indicate masked contaminating sources.

The appendices provide the technical details, auxiliary tests, and robustness checks supporting the main results presented in the paper. These additional analyses support the principal conclusion that the MIR evolution of UGC 11487 requires a structured, phase-dependent dust response.

Appendix G CIGALE input parameters for SED modelling

We modelled the broadband spectral energy distribution (SED) of UGC 11487 with CIGALE using the pdf_analysis method. The input photometry covers the UV-to-radio wavelength range. The four IRAS bands were treated as upper limits and included in the likelihood calculation using the full upper-limit treatment in CIGALE.

The SED was constructed using the following sequence of CIGALE modules (Bruzual and Charlot 2003): sfhdelayed, bc03, nebular, dustatt_modified_starburst, dale2014, radio, and redshifting. The stellar emission was computed using the Bruzual and Charlot (2003) stellar population synthesis models with a Chabrier (2003) initial mass function. Nebular emission was included following Inoue (2011). Dust attenuation was modelled with a modified starburst attenuation law based on Calzetti et al. (2000), and the infrared dust emission was described using the templates of Dale et al. (2014). The radio continuum was modelled through the standard CIGALE radio prescription, which relies on the FIR/radio correlation (e.g. Helou et al. 1985; Yun et al. 2001). The redshifting module accounts for the source redshift and includes intergalactic medium absorption following Meiksin (2006). The adopted parameter grid is given in Table 14.

Table 14: CIGALE modules and parameter grid used for the SED modelling of UGC 11487.
Module Parameter Adopted values
sfhdelayed τmain\tau_{\rm main} [Myr] 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, 6000
agemainage_{\rm main} [Myr] 8000, 9000, 10000, 11000, 12000
τburst\tau_{\rm burst} [Myr] 10
ageburstage_{\rm burst} [Myr] 10
fburstf_{\rm burst} 0.0
normalise True
bc03 IMF Chabrier
metallicity 0.02
separation age [Myr] 10
nebular logU\log U 2.0-2.0, 3.0-3.0, 3.5-3.5, 4.0-4.0
ZgasZ_{\rm gas} 0.02
nen_{\rm e} [cm3\mathrm{cm^{-3}}] 100
fescf_{\rm esc} 0.0
fdustf_{\rm dust} 0.0
line width [kms1\mathrm{km\,s^{-1}}] 300
dustatt_modified_starburst E(BV)linesE(B-V)_{\rm lines} 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 1.0
E(BV)E(B-V) factor 0.44
UV bump wavelength [nm] 217.5
UV bump width [nm] 35.0
UV bump amplitude 0.0
power-law slope δ\delta 0.2, 0.1, 0.0, 0.1-0.1, 0.25-0.25, 0.5-0.5
emission-line extinction law MW
RVR_{V} 3.1
dale2014 fAGNf_{\rm AGN} 0.0, 0.001, 0.01, 0.05, 0.1
α\alpha 1.5, 1.625, 1.75, 1.875, 2.0, 2.25
radio qIR,SFq_{\rm IR,SF} 2.25, 2.58, 2.75
αSF\alpha_{\rm SF} 0.8
RAGNR_{\rm AGN} 0
αAGN\alpha_{\rm AGN} 0
redshifting redshift from the input file