Published
867
Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free
Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.
Egyptian billionaire Nassef Sawiris has blamed “years of incompetence” by the Conservatives for tax changes that he says have driven him to leave the UK.
Sawiris, who is Egypt’s richest man and co-owner of English football club Aston Villa, told the Financial Times he recently moved his residency from London to Italy and Abu Dhabi, in an interview at his long-standing office overlooking Mayfair’s Berkeley Square that he has since vacated.
He said the decision to move abroad after 15 years of living in the UK was because of a government crackdown on non-domiciled residents announced by the previous Tory administration.
“You can’t blame Labour,” Sawiris said. “This was all in the making for 10 years of incompetence by the most left-leaning Conservative party in history.”
The changes, announced by Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt and confirmed last autumn by his Labour replacement Rachel Reeves, ended a tax regime that allowed UK residents who declared their permanent home was elsewhere to avoid paying tax on foreign income and gains.
Sawiris joins a rush of other wealthy individuals who have left or are considering leaving the UK — such as steel tycoon Lakshmi Mittal — following the tax changes, which came into effect on April 6.
Reeves has taken the brunt of criticism over the series of tax rises meant to address the UK’s dire public finances and help her meet so-called fiscal rules in order to avoid spiralling interest rates on government debt.
“I feel bad for her,” Sawiris said about Reeves. “She’s behaving like Margaret Thatcher on fiscal discipline. Otherwise, the UK would have had a 7 per cent interest rate.”
Yet he cautioned that Reeves should be more accommodating to wealthy businesspeople, given their tax contributions could play a key role in funding government services. He added it was likely to be difficult persuading many of the leavers to come back.
“High net worth or wealthy entrepreneurs have options. She should treat them like they are her best clients,” he added. “I don’t know any person in my circle who is not moving this April, or next April if [their children] have a school year or something like that.”
Aston Villa midfielder Morgan Rogers reacts as Paris Saint-Germain midfielder Vitinha (left) vies for the ball during the Uefa Champions League quarter-final second-leg football match between Aston Villa and Paris Saint-Germain at Villa Park in Birmingham on April 15 2025.
Aston Villa lost on aggregate against Paris Saint-Germain in the Uefa Champions League quarter-final this month © Franke Fife/AFP via Getty Images
Sawiris also confirmed changes to inheritance tax — which Labour introduced — also played a role in his decision to give up his UK residency. Reeves used the October Budget to end the use of offshore trusts to avoid UK inheritance tax at 40 per cent.
The change means wealthy people will be “risking half your net worth” if they die while staying in the UK, he warned.
“On April 7, if a bus hit me [then] my family is bankrupt because they have to pay 40 some per cent in taxes, because my assets are not liquid. They have to go through a fire sale to pay that bill.”
Sawiris, whose net worth was pegged at $9bn by Forbes, is the youngest son of the late Onsi Sawiris, who founded a construction company in the 1950s and built it over decades into a large multinational corporation now called Orascom Construction.
As the business grew, the family diversified, entering the cement industry and expanding operations from Egypt into other emerging markets.
Sawiris’s family, who are Coptic Christians, were targeted with tax grabs and a travel ban by the Muslim Brotherhood, which swept to power in Egypt in 2012 in the aftermath of the Arab uprisings, although it was later deposed in a coup.
The UK “gave me a home when the Muslim Brotherhood came to Egypt and I will always be in debt”, he said. “I’m keeping my house, I’m growing my investment in Aston Villa, looking at expanding the stadium. And it hasn’t changed my love for this country.”
He said his remarks came out of care for the UK, where three of his four children were born. Sherine, his wife, is a member of the board of trustees of the American School in London, which his children attended.
Nassef Sawiris and Wesley Edens, owners of Aston Villa, stand pitchside prior a match
From left: Nassef Sawiris and Wes Edens, owners of Aston Villa © Neville Williams/Aston Villa FC via Getty Images
Exiting UK taxpayers face limits on how much time they can return to spend in the country each year, in many cases 90 days annually, with just 30 days permitted for work.
Sawiris will use some of those days to visit and attend matches of his Birmingham-based football club Aston Villa, which exited the Champions League last week despite a spirited attempted comeback in the second leg of the quarter-final against Qatar-owned Paris Saint-Germain.
He and US billionaire Wes Edens, co-founder of Fortress Investment Group, acquired a 55 per cent stake in the club for £30mn in 2018, rescuing it from financial crisis and returning it to English football’s Premier League, where the team sits in seventh place.
Sawiris and his partners have invested heavily into the club to improve performance. However, the club is not profitable and previously sold young players to comply with Premier League financial regulations that limit how much teams are allowed to lose.
Sawiris has complained the rules are anti-competitive and prevent challenger clubs from closing the gap with the likes of Manchester City and Liverpool.
“The Premier League is under the impression that what makes it great is Manchester United and Liverpool and Chelsea and Arsenal, so they have to cater for these guys. But what makes the Premier League great is that Manchester United get their butts kicked by Brighton.”
Aston Villa and Paris Saint-Germain line up as a large banner is shown ahead of the UEFA Champions League quarter-final, second leg match at Villa Park, Birmingham
Sawiris plans to boost the capacity of Aston Villa’s stadium to 50,000 seats as part of a £100mn investment © Nick Potts/PA Wire
Aston Villa will see the capacity of its stadium boosted to more than 50,000 seats from current levels of 42,000, as part of a plan by Sawiris to invest about £100mn more into the team. However, development is pending local officials moving ahead with expanding rail links.
Sawiris redomiciled his NNS Group family office last year from Luxembourg to Abu Dhabi, where he has built close relations with its rulers and has become a rare outsider to have been granted citizenship. He told the FT last year that the city’s advantages include a stable and effective government as well as “English law without English weather”.
Through NNS, Sawiris controls his holdings in Dutch-listed fertiliser company OCI, sportswear group Adidas where he sits on the board of directors, the stake in Aston Villa and as well as others.
Sawiris last year also joined the board of XRG, a company created by Abu Dhabi’s national oil company Adnoc to invest in global energy assets.
Sawiris said his London office, which sits above the Phillips art gallery, was vacated in the past few weeks. He has relocated more than 40 employees to Abu Dhabi.
“They [my employees] have to move to a 45 per cent tax saving, so it’s not that tough for them,” he laughed.

Promoted Content

Comments

Commenting is only available to readers with an FT subscription

Please login or subscribe to join the conversation.

Comment guidelines

Please keep comments respectful. Use plain English for our global readership and avoid using phrasing that could be misinterpreted as offensive. By commenting, you agree to abide by our community guidelines and these terms and conditions. We encourage you to report inappropriate comments.
Comments are closed on this story.
The new tax rule on inheritance of foreign assets is particularly absurd. Suppose someone has built their career abroad and invested proceeds in foreign assets, then later decides to move to UK and contribute to its economy - why should the UK tax authorities have claim on inheritance of their foreign assets?

This type of ridiculous tax policy only reveals how clueless and arrogant UK govt has become. No plans to generate economic growth and revenues at home, so seize people's assets abroad. This is the level of incompetence we are funding with our UK taxes.
The UK “gave me a home when the Muslim Brotherhood came to Egypt and I will always be in debt”, he said.
Yeah, of course you will.

I actually think the policy it is poorly executed and created for (understandable) political popularity reasons, but comments such as this are so utterly crass that they could make a mad right wing Tory into a raving Trot.
Removing the non dom rule was so foolish. It will bring in little direct revenue and will eliminate a lot indirect revenue from these extremely wealthy individuals.
Totally agree - I am U.K. taxpayer, always have been, but I have no problem with non doms given the economic benefits to our country and the cultural benefits as so many of them contribute to many great causes, both cultural and needy. We are being very short sighted .. sad to be honest as my children will suffer for this as our country deteriorates
All part of a story of sad UK own goals. Exit the single market, drive away rich, contributing taxpayers, close local producution and buy and ship oil, gas and coal from abroad. Result is accelerating national decline and these subjects are scarcely on the agenda for debate, let alone change. Further economic decline is baked in, as I see it.
Pandering to wealthy foreigners avoiding tax isn't going to turn the UK economy round.
Clearly not but it is a small step in that direction
I think to are me very wrong on this ! The policy is a vote winner but economically totally flawed
“On April 7, if a bus hit me [then] my family is bankrupt because they have to pay 40 some per cent in taxes, because my assets are not liquid. They have to go through a fire sale to pay that bill.”
Illiquid doesn't mean insolvent or bankrupt...even if it was a fire sale and if it were a fire sale that would decrease the value thereby reducing the liability.
wrong. the value of the estate would be calculated before any "firesafe". it would be based on the notional value at the time of inheriting. the liability would be based on on the higher number. Theoretically the 40% tax could become far higher.
Well then the executors would be negligent to sell an asset at an undervalue, but the overarching point remains that the estate wouldn't be 'bankrupt'.
(Edited)
Your point is irrelevant to UK tax policy. What is relevant is that 1000s of British and non dom millionaires have left prior to April 7 2025 and there is a new 10-20 billion annual black hole in 2027/28 because of it. You figure out how to fill.
My point had nothing at all to do with UK tax policy, rather it was making an observation by a man who is worth USD 9bn and why I thought his statement about a 'bankruptcy' definition was perhaps wrong.

Sure the 10-20 'blackhole' will be fine with the 'fiscal headroom' (both concepts which are entirely artificial)
(Edited)

That's great that this bloke has lots of money and lived in the UK and has been able to share the common goods that us tax payers have funded.

But I live in the UK AND I have had to pay SHED LOADS of tax all my life.

If I hadn't I could easily have afforded to buy my local football club and keep talent.
I could have paid for the local Zoo's Children's petting area.
I could have donated my money to a Charity and then been invited to Buck Palace garden parties.
I could have employed more people.
My children could have avoided IHT.
If I didn't pay tax I would love to look cool by saying I support labour. All I have to do is pay tax and all I got is lousy public services.
I certainly don't ever get sympathetic articles written about MY high tax bill in the otherwise left-leaning FT.
If you are moving abroad to avoid paying tax, you were not paying much anyway and its no great loss to the rest of us poor saps.
(Edited)
Buddy 1000s of millionaires who did pay 9-20 billion in tax per year so far are leaving the country. Excited that you feel good about picking up their taxes too. I wouldn’t.
(Edited)
The headline belies the truth. He actually says that some of Reeves policies closing offshore fund access were also a contributing factor. Reeves could have reversed those Tory policies if she felt inclined to but then ……. how would the Unite union react?
He sounds American.
I am pretty sure he would be welcome there.
The US IRS would love to have him there.
You start paying USA tax on your WORLWIDE earnings after just 90 days of living there.
The UK performs poorly on investment (as does the US - all that cheap money thanks to China and their bridges still fell down). Investing in Aston Villa is not a good investment - but nor is frightening away those who risk their capital - aka 'the wealthy'.

Would it not be better to have a broader, simpler taxation system, with a greater emphasis on economic rents while at the same time reducing the marginal tax madness that exists throughout the economy?
This interview is a wake up call to both the Conservatives and Labour who are responsible for an insane policy that drives away our biggest tax payers (and biggest spenders driving the economy) simply because government greed wants to take even more in tax.
We will all end up with less tax revenue and less economic growth.
An inane bipartisan policy.
(Edited)
I have lost more to USD depreciation and stock exchange collapse than the UK would ever tax me.

Thanks, Trump and your "anti-tax" policies! Inescapable wherever you live, dont wait until you're dead, and don't even pay for services to the community.

Taxes are the price of civilization. Trump is the price of economic, cultural, and social barbarism.

Compared to the US rabid nonsense, the UK is a haven for rich people. And somewhat rich people like me. Might as well stay in the UK.
So what?
Let them go. Our country also has options and pandering to arrogant , entitled people who think they have a right to benefit from the advantages of Britain without paying tax is just not smart. It is a moral issue more than a financial issue. Great that this PR piece gives us details on “ Egypt’s richest man “ but he is not relevant to our country as his interests lie elsewhere. Faire enough ! Next !
it is illogical to shun HNWs who will pay more tax in a year than the average UK taxpayer does in a lifetime. Cutting off our nose to spite our face willonly increase the tax funding gap.
any evidence? A quick AI search says Non Doms contributed £8.9bn of £4888bn of personal tax revenues - 1.8%.
He just moved his family office of 40 something employees that paid 45% tax, his kids/their kids will no longer be educated in the UK (so private school fees gone), what good is that?
Only problem with that is they do not actually pay tax. The non doms have years of not paying and then only paid a miserly £30k a year. Through their complex structures they just find ways not to pay back to the community but then throw a few pennies at their philanthropy which is mostly tax deductible also. To let this group of slippery individuals off while the majority of taxpayers are getting squeezed is just not sustainable. I am in the fortunate position of being wealthy enough to look after myself and my family. I worked hard to get to this position and I do not mind paying what is due. There is no moral justification for treating these people any differently. The challenge now is that we have an educated population who will not be silenced by awful people who think their good fortune affords them the opportunity get even more benefits. Let them leave and find another country that lets them contribute to their society
I think this is very short-sighted. The Government could simply have increased the taxes on the wealth that the non-doms bring into the UK. Why should they pay tax to the UK Government on assets they hold elsewhere that have nothing to do with the UK ? Additionally, why should they pay IHT if their heirs are living elsewhere ?
And they still bring in revenues (hence my point that the Govt could simply have increased the taxes on the wealth they bring into the UK) - they employ staff, spend money in restaurants etc...so they do contribute. Now all of that will vanish.
Ehm … because the law states that UK residents we pay taxes residents on all global income and assets. Simple. If they want to be resident and their residency is approved then they need to do their duty and contribute like all other residents. There is no rational for making them a special case. If they do not like it, they take their pompous , self satisfied entitlement to another country that does mind being ripped by freeloaders.
.....except they are not saying that they shouldn't pay tax. They are talking about not wanting to tax on foreign assets and income. They generally pay a lot of tax in the UK. The average non-dom paid £139,000 income tax alone in the 23-24 tax year. That does not include various other taxes.
Average tax of 1.8 percent. They are drifters and they need to be stopped .
allowed UK residents who declared their permanent home was elsewhere to avoid paying tax on foreign income and gains.
Avoid? They’re paying taxes elsewhere on that income, it doesn’t belong to UK Plc. The Uk should only receive tax on UK earnings and investments.
If you live here and benefit from its services, safety, and rule of law, pay up. The City has leveraged its privileges dating back to before Hastings to become the centre of offshore finance and tax avoidance so no, they probably aren't paying taxes elsewhere-- they're funnelling it through shell corporations and artificial transfer pricing to avoid taxation anywhere. It's among the least democratically accountable institutions on Earth.
You’re missing the point and diverting with an assumption that everyone invests in the City, which is wrong and even nonsensical.

Let’s take a simple example: a Japanese born person with investments there, and paying tax there, but currently resident in the UK, should not be paying tax in the UK on the Japanese part of his portfolio, only the UK income. He’s not a UK national.

The same principle of fairness applies in reverse. That’s how it should work and does in much of the world.
The UK governments for the last 15 years have been following a cunning “baldrick” plan. Let’s tank the economy, isolate ourselves, break down social services and make our country so unappealing as a means to keep a lid on immigration!
This is a disappointingly poor piece of journalism, certainly not what I expect from the FT. It’s a glamorous portrayal of a man who is simply choosing to avoid paying taxes on a fortune inherited from his father, who made his money through contracting in the Middle East in the ’60s and ’70s, dealing with the likes of Qaddafi, Sadat, and Saddam. The reporters fail to highlight the origin of his billions, opting instead to play the world’s tiniest violin for a tax-avoiding billionaire. They even go so far as to mention Aston Villa’s Champions League match last week and his wife’s role on a school board. This reads like a shameless PR piece.
Still keeping Aston Villa though…..

Suppose you need something to get you through the boredom of living in the Middle East. Only so many times you can go shopping or on a dune safari.
I don’t understand this endless stream of articles on this subject. The right and then the left made the decision to end the non dom arrangements. While forgoing their obligation to grandfather existing arrangements. The toothpaste is out of the tube. There is no going back. It will take a few generations to re-establish trust. So it’s time to wear the dress and move on.
Unlike the 1970s there are huge numbers of people like me with foreign spouses who see what other countries have to offer and are leaving UK plc to its rotten socialist experiment destined to failure. It breaks my heart but I will not inflict my children to such a limited doom laden future where hard work and responsibility is envied and punished with crippling taxes. The real tragedy is that England especially has not voted for the policies being pursued the last 15 years and millions of hard working good people have been betrayed by the LibLabCon.
Paying a fair and reasonable amount if tax in relation to an average standard of living is a 'rotten socialist experiment'?
Interesting.
So cutting ctg from 12.5k to 3k..( not including inflation) is not a socialist act?? The punter takes the risk and the government creams the profits
Marginal taxes for individuals and other entities (e.g., in effect, local government) are not fair or reasonable. Or rather, most rational people would seek to re-allocate their resources accordingly (less work or work elsewhere).
Is 60% marginal tax between £ 100 and £ 120 K not high enough? - brought to us by the fake Tories!
* waves goodbye *
Trumpian incompetence will lead many Americans to flee the US. After all, Donald promised to make America great again. He’s sunk the Dow and the Dollar at the same time. Not bad for 100 days in office. Think what grand incompetence he will achieve by the end of his term.
Sawiris sounds eminently sensible, and I would've to be able to follow suit.
The UK no longer makes sense for this of us who want to prosper, or having prospered to stay comfortable.
Auf wiedersehen.
Keep that red flag flying.
Silly boy.
Cutting off the nose to spite the face - couldn’t find a better example of this.

The whole country is adamant that billionaires pay their “fair share” but practically you are chasing away those that are already paying millions in taxes per head, even with the non dom benefit. These are people who hardly ever use the free schools or hospitals or take benefits. Instead, we seem to be filling up the country with benefits seeking asylum seekers and low skilled migrants. The other spurious argument is that Mayfair property will become cheaper - they are not selling, just leaving the country. This is just envy, there is no economic logic to the policy.

Wouldn’t you rather keep the billionaires and take whatever taxes they are paying like the Swiss or does the country want to die in the ditch on a point of principle? Each non-dom leaving is equal to a hundred average taxpayers.
(Edited)
Well, there is at least 1 person that is not adamant that billionaires are paying their fair share...

I posted elsewhere that the top 1% pay around 30% of taxes, but that this is only part of the story. I went on to quote research from LSE that said some, with income of £1m, have an effective tax rate of 11%, the same as someone earning £15k (at the time of the research). Does that sound like those people are paying their fair share to you, because it doesn't to me. Perhaps the surprising thing - this generally isn't because of elaborate avoidance schemes, it's because of the way the system is designed.

The top 1% also owns around 10% of all household wealth, roughly equivalent to around the bottom 50% of people - so, it really does stand to reason that their tax burden is higher.

There needs to be an open and honest conversation about tax - tax on income and tax on wealth - but like most other areas of policy, we just seem to get the polar positions with little thought beyond self.

We're at a break point - Neoliberalism has failed - fresh thinking is needed.
- with 1m INCOME the effective tax rate will never be 11% unless you cheat
- lets assume it is (its not but humour me) that is 110k in taxes which is equivalent to what dozens (?) of average earners will pay so why would you want to get rid of the tax optimizing capitalist?..
Even under the proposed changes to the non-dom regime, many wealthy individuals will continue to pay less tax than the average UK worker - not because they earn less, but because they are uniquely placed to exploit residency rules and control what income is taxable in the UK.
They often:
  • Calculate their stays precisely, keeping just below the UK’s statutory residence thresholds;
  • Bring in only the minimum funds required for their UK lifestyle - paying tax on a small fraction of their global wealth;
  • Leave the bulk of their income and assets offshore, beyond the reach of HMRC;
  • Use international mobility and bespoke financial planning to stay compliant while minimising their tax liability far below that of an ordinary UK resident.
Meanwhile, a standard UK employee on a £40k–£50k salary pays full income tax and National Insurance on most earnings, with no ability to defer, remit selectively, or shelter income abroad - and faces a much higher effective tax rate in practice.
The proposed reforms may alter the technical framework, but they don’t change the underlying reality: many non-doms still live in a different financial world, where UK tax remains largely optional, and the country a convenient base rather than a place of full fiscal commitment.
.
(Edited)
I couldn't have put it any better, or maybe even as well as, Andrew Winton.
I don't need to humour you, because that's what the LSE's research said - I quoted it in my other response. I don't have any research to the contrary - do you?
I didn't say I want to get rid of them, I suggested that they ought to have a higher effective tax rate than someone on £15k a year... However, precisely the type of response I expected. Cheers.
(Edited)
'Wouldn’t you rather keep the billionaires and take whatever taxes they are paying'
Yes. But as other contributors have said, the tax system is designed as such to enable lower tax effective rates for the top earners. That's upside down, right?

Basic foodstuffs, energy, fuels cost the same for everyone. The tax structure is based upon the cost of basic living; to function as a person in a society. So, the more you earn the more tax you pay.
Workers contribute more to the economy than asset grabbers who pay no tax.
Italy and Abu Dhabi? Does he have to decide on one as his home?
Whatever you think of non-doms, the claim that we've had our fair share of incompetent politicians (from both sides of the aisle) of late is not wrong...
I’ve just remembered this from 50, probably more years ago: on the radio, car or tower crane.The BBC man was interviewing a lady ship. She spoke about tax “ you must understand that when one is very rich paying tax is optional ““Do you pay tax milady?”The voice, dripping with contemptuous hauteur :”Don’t be impertinent young man”
Horrible but that’s the reality
Musk syndrome. Daddy got rich and Sonny did well out of it. Talk about wanting the cake and eating it?
Speaking of Musk and people like him, why don’t they donate some of their wealth to the very poor in their country instead of pretending to represent them politically and doing nothing for them except raise their taxes through a scattergun tariff barrage?
Non doms last year paid £9bn in tax. Reeves and her envy politics of the left have scared them away and their tax paid. Thats a lot of tax everyone else will have to pay - what an absurd policy to force wealthy people to leave. Yet another example of economic and political incompetence from this out of its depth government
(Edited)
Yes and Nun the Wiser (below) has now focussed on working citizens for 30 min already and is about to produce the answer how he fills the 9 billion gap

The 9 billion btw is just non doms. The majority of us leaving including our family business are British. And we have to be moving thousands of staff, not the majority but many. So the number is multiple times 9

At the same time illegal immigrants are attracted in droves. This is not going to go so well.
Exactly
How come non dome paid nine thousand million pounds in tax.?
If they did pay as non doms not much point in being nom dom, yout better off being non and have done with it.
Aren’t you?
Mmm so grateful that this country saves him from imprisonment & torture that he’s running off to Abu Dhabi, rather than pay his fair share of taxes here - disgusting!
Let’s focus on our hard working citizens who do pay their taxes
Fully agree but they shouldn’t have to pay IHT as well
(Edited)
Ok great. Let’s us know how that is going in 2027 when the 25/26 tax returns do not come in. (Details in Thread below). Good thing is we don’t need to argue the numbers will speak for themselves.
(Edited)
Hi Nun you have now focussed for 30 min or more on hard working people. So how is it going with the ideas on the tax gap?
The common sense path is somewhere in the middle. Non-dom is not sustainable - it was anyway limited to 15 years by the Tories a while back. People of his wealth organise their affairs to limit the tax on income and capital gain. The real issue his IHT. Perhaps Reeve could plot a path to lower IHT, certainly to much higher exemptions and a graduated rate. The US exemption is $14MM. By contrast across the EU IHT and wealth tax bite.

The solution - hard to get to - is lower, flatter tax rate with few or no special allowances. People pay 20% but flee 40%.
Does Starmer have the inspiration and cojones to abolish IHT? The Exchequer would lose, what, £10bn, but gain massively in much needed inward investment flows. I agree with Sawiris that the Tories are to blame for 14 years of being unTory with foreign wealth. Not even 99%. It’s 110% the case. However I also agree that the non dom system was not fit for purpose and open to abuse. For example if Sawiris, say, says his real home is in Egypt, what’s he doing now in Abu Dhabi and Milan? What I don’t agree with is to cancel non dom with no sufficiently attractive alternative, which the proposals we’ve so far heard are not. Abolition of IHT would do just that, and it would be fantastic to see Labour (who were never the real culprits against foreign wealth) bring it about before the Tories or Reform ever start to promise it again (without ever delivering). We must also not forget it’s never the rich that end up paying the bulk of the IHT, they can simply afford to leave the UK to avoid it, taking all or nearly all their wealth with them in the process. IHT is a major own goal, no wonder more and more countries are abolishing it (including Italy and India)
Swiss system is brilliant. Everyone pays income and wealth tax but at low rates and different by canton. (Means Birmingham can collect garbage).

Foreigners coming in negotiate taxes with cantons at fixed rules and pay pre agreed income and wealth tax

No capital gains tax no inheritance tax.
Forfait system available now in only 5 of the 26 cantons. Of course there are other perks on offer from various other Swiss cantons, but fully agreed with your central point
They pay 7 quid for a jar of jam though ;)
So, if you do not have the balls to say these to your own government, you should not say these to the government of the country you migrated to run away from your own.
I will just comment on the 'family will be bankrupt if I die tomorrow' and on the fire-sale of assets: "If due, inheritance tax must in general be paid by the end of the sixth month after death. For assets that are potentially difficult to sell, such as houses or certain shares and securities, it can be split into equal instalments over a period of 10 years." So, I don't buy that argument.
(Edited)
Why do you think more millionaires leave the Uk than in any other country but China? This is 40 per cent of 8 non listed companies which then would be in total meltdown as the buyers would know the fire sale situation. It’s just not practical and there are plenty of places without IHT. You can keep the Chelsea mansion but stay 90 days or less and all works.
Might be because the UK produces a lot of them?
(Edited)
1000s of us left paying 10s of billions in tax per year most of us British but also some others.

Millionaires flee with their money and staff and find better places to pay tax. Why do you think Ineos and Dyson etc etc left?

Immigrants come and take benefits and are not allowed to work.

This is not going to be particularly helpful for the UK and the spiteful comments below don’t help to get the UK growth back in any way.

Wake up. Read facts many are below in comments.
He is so full of sh..

Moves away from uk for tax reasons. Then supports labour? What a fraud.
This is why countries should stop allowing repatriation
Does anyone think Italy will get more in taxes than the paltry 200k Euros? Basically a tip
Top developed countries should not compete to the lowest possible level
And tax all payments/revenues that are sent to non-compliant countries
Just to brief you on the non dom concept, as it seems you don’t understand it:

1 the flat fee is only on your foreign revenues.

2 we pay taxes on the revenues we make locally, what we need to maintain our lifestyle. In the case of billionaires living in London, you can imagine they spent millions per year and paid 40% of that, same in Italy.

3 and obviously on the lifestyle spend , there is also VAT. And the restaurants, jewellers, tailors etc we buy from, usually make a profit and pay taxes… That’s the indirect tax revenues.

4 and when selling that super nice mansion to the non dom, the previous owner most probably paid taxes on the profit he made.

All in all, a billionaire non dom means millions in taxes for your country.
Sad but true
Funny that the privatising Brexit-Tories are considered left wing. Highest tax rates in generations does qualify as economic and fiscal incompetence though - which they were from Cameron to Sunak.
Interestingly, he relocated to the EU, where the tax laws are more punitive than those in the UK. Most non-domiciled residents in the UK are relocating to the EU. The departure of non-doms stems from Britain’s isolation following Brexit.
Rubbish.
(Edited)
One point that Brexit supporters resist acknowledging is that post-Brexit, Britain has become a less appealing country for investment. Previously, Britain attracted considerable capital from institutional investors due to its status as a gateway to Europe and its ability to influence EU policies. This attractiveness also extended to private investors- the wealthy could access the broader EU market by investing in Britain. Many financial services firms based in the UK utilised the EU passporting system to engage in unrestricted trading with minimal authorisation. However, this situation has drastically changed after Brexit. Discussing Brexit openly has become controversial; that is why affluent non-doms often provide alternative justifications for leaving Britain.
I think you should check the latest stats on countries attracting the most inward investment. The uk is doing rather well.
It’s for the weather.
(Edited)
Quite. De Minimis Fixed fee in Italy, but Abu Dhabi gets the wealth relocation. Same as many, many others. & they’ll quickly tire of the burglaries/car thefts in Italy. AND THE BIG ISSUE IS IHT. Nothing else. & that was exclusively Reeves.
Italy has a non dom system, like Greece, that’s why people move there, to get what they lost in the UK.
People often forget that non-doms pay exactly the same tax as the rest of us on what they earn in the UK, and in tax year 22-23, they paid a total of £8.9bn in taxes to HMRC. The Treasury (I assume in order to give politicians cover to enact stupid policies) doesn’t seem to break this down by tax type, but the vast majority must surely be income tax. So no-doms were something around 3.5% of income tax receipts that year?! We already have an arguably unstably progressive income tax profile, with the top 1% of income tax payers paying around 30% of total income tax, and the top 10% approximately 60%. So, ideology aside, just thinking about plain maths - surely the last people on earth a sane tax system should be encouraging to leave are the payers of 3.5% of annual income tax?
You are totally right but it won’t stop people mindlessly repeating “non-doms don’t pay tax”
(Edited)
Rich people do not pay income tax. Tax planning 101. Rich people take out loans against their collateral for their spending money, which are not regarded as income. Their companies do not pay them wages, either. They take out loans. Any rich person declaring taxable income at a high level has a very, very poor set of advisors. They pay other taxes such as VAT and stamp duty but these are charged at levels lower than income tax.
Interesting. I thought rich people still have to pay tax on their interest and dividends, no?
At a much lower level and the level of both interest and loans can be manipulated.
This is so low level it’s not worth commenting. Facts below for people who care re facts.
According to the Chartered Institute of Taxation: “
The total UK income tax, capital gains tax and national insurance paid by all non-doms was £8.49 billion in the year to 5 April 2022….”
Tbf. The fundamental issue for heading offski is IHT. That was the deal breaker.
Hmmm, bought his kids a nice passport and now he's off.
Reeves did not have to follow through on the non dom plans of the conservatives. She implemented both that and the inheritance tax raids. Her fiscal gains from these are minimal as compared to the losses from both the richest leaving the UK and the loss of confidence (and thus of investment). Build wealth to build the economy, create jobs, generate taxes, so correct: yet she and Starmer have done nothing but destroy that capability.
(Edited)
What many of the spiteful commentators dont get is that very few people of everyone leaving gives an interview. This is daring.

The decade long Osborne-Hunt-Reeves stealth attack on this topic comprises British and non-British entrepreneurs. UK is almost catching up with China on most millionaires leaving. Why do you think Ineos, Dyson and many other owners do not reside here? Because we all enjoy flying in and out to the Chelsea Flower Show and Wimbledon?



The main net take is that you have to prepare for another big black hole in UK finance in 27/28 when this becomes apparent.

Pensions next - the attack is coming to trusts including Jersey trusts in 26/27 and will fully impact after the next election.
How does UK tax policy on non-dom compare to the US?
As far as I know the US does not have any equivalent to the Uk non-dom scheme. I believe that countries which do offer similar schemes include Italy, Switzerland, Portugal, Canada, Malta, Cyprus, Abu Dhabi, lots of Caribbean islands, and probably a bunch of other places I don’t know about.
I think they have various trusts that work for IHT though and isn’t their IHT starting at 10m, same for the entrepreneurs relief equivalent (and I think that is per venture not lifetime).

We are in a global market and conceitedly think we don’t need to compete then wonder why we are left with the takers not the makers.
If they live in Florida or Nevada there is 0% local income tax.
But they still pay the federal income tax to finance the 1 trillion military budget.
(Edited)
What a Parasite! The article should have included Italy's tax policy as well as the US for comparison. He and his cohorts fleeing will be the first running for the safety of the UK once again when Abu Dhabi's Muslims have a change of heart towards infidels and Italy economy crashes.
Can you help me understand why you call him a parasite?

He and his ilk have paid billions of £ of direct taxes, plus however many millions of stamp duty, VAT, NICS on his employees, etc, and he has clearly created jobs in the UK. The article says he sent his children to a private school so he didn’t burden the state with that, and he probably has private healthcare. How on earth is he a parasite?
“They have more money than me.”
Don't forget the other side: "he's amazing because he has so much money"
You are right and all this hate is unfortunately due to terrible envy of true parasites who are probably living off welfare. Shame they are in majority, can vote and move the needle in the election.
They are self harming though, I'm am happy to see some benefits cut off and would welcome more.

Hard working people know how valuable tax payers are on any level without any sentiment of envy.
Rich from someone clearly on a free university subscription.
How do you know?
A tax refugee… poor guy
‘This article will rattle the comment section’
*looks at comment section*
‘Yup’
ladder curve in full forceIf they put IHT at 10% for non doms not only would they stay, more would come
Laffer
Where we go is no IHT my friend
If you love the country that much, get permanent residency or citizenship? Ah but then you’d have to pay tax properly and into the public systems. I don’t blame the guy for leaving, and I fully accept he’s right about the atrocious tax system for both locals and outsiders, but please don’t try to fool us with this talk of loving the UK. You love the tax free lifestyle, and so you’re leaving now that it’s not as tax free as it was.
He isn't English. He doesn't want to leave his family stuffed because he happens to like football. Makes sense to me. He didn't make his money in England and he is avoiding tax on his non English earnings. What's wrong with that?
Rich old people used to love London. Theatre, restaurants, shopping....now they have to hide in Dubai or wherever. It's just stupid.
Do you think he paid taxes in Egypt? There's a cost of freedom. Everyone should pay their fair share. Can't have a stable economy built on freeloaders - rich or poor.
Ideology over revenue. I.e. cutting one’s nose…
As a non dom a billionaire like him probably paid hundred times what the average Brit pays in taxes.
Even those who love the country aren't going to endure a 40% IHT
He has almost certainly paid multiples of the UK tax you will pay in your entire lifetime,
I'm almost certain his advisors make sure he doesn't. Or why else does he pay them?
Well, we know that a relatively small number of non-doms are paying £8.9bn in direct taxes, so clearly you are wrong. He also employed 40 people in London, who would have attracted NICS and will have been paying their own income tax. Plus anything he spent in the Uk attracted VAT, and stamp duty is also impossible to avoid. Also, if he could magically avoid tax then why is he leaving the Uk? Unless you can point at some specific bit of magic tax avoidance, I am afraid any reasonable person would have to conclude you’re wrong.
Why isn't this guy paying taxes in his home country Egypt?
Because as a Coptic Christian, he probably doesn't feel safe there.
But hey, why should anyone feel obliged to pay taxes in the country they are born in?
I bet he made over 90% of his money in a country he doesn't feel safe in, the hypocrisy.
What’s hypocritical about it? He played tough game against all the odds (as a minority) and paid his dues. Despite which I’m sure he would have been target - esp under the MB.

Would you hang around? Most of us def jump ship with as much as we could carry.
Ok then don't whine about your taxes. You live iņ the UK in a country ruled by law. Dont like it, go back to Egypt.
Or the UAE, Switzerland, Italy etc etc - why go back to Egypt? The place is an economic backwater with no rule of law. If you can’t afford it, why not go elsewhere?
Then don't whine about English taxes.
He has left, taking jobs and tax contributions with him. Wow we sure showed him…
I doubt it he took that many jobs with him.
You don’t become rich by paying tax….
You pay your taxes or your wealth is stolen, only mobster don't pay their taxes.
That’s how losers justify losing.
he just told you he moved 40 employees to Dubai and vacated his office and people are still asking what is the economic impact? The economic impact will go beyond the 13b gbp in taxes the non doms paid. I would imagine very few of those forty employees were non doms themselves, impact on the economy is real and by the time it is felt it will be too late to revert. The IHT hit is a very dumb move which is making them to move. The effect is they will raise 0 IHT on these guys but the UK just lost revenues.
And think of all the stamp duty and VAT these guys were paying.
Madness.
The politics of envy yet again and make us all poorer.
“They [my employees] have to move to a 45 per cent tax saving, so it’s not that tough for them,” he laughs.“.
If I would think a second to get on the plane…
For the good riddance party, also a startup founder like my husband who just raised money at £100m valuation — he s clearly worried now what would happen if the unthinkable happens. It’s so much easier outside of the UK, why bother.
Move
This country needs the creation of more jobs that everyone can do, to reduce the welfare and increase productivity. This can be done by restoring offshored industries. Not sure about the benefits of football. I much prefer to live in a place where everybody works rather than only a few, even if they are rich non-dom that pay a fortune in taxes.
(Edited)
Good luck over to you then.

We are British passport holders and paid only some tens of millions in CGT and income tax and nowhere near what Sawiris would have paid but it was good to be here for the last decades. We will keep our house but limit our days.

Should you not have noted this is a broad based exodus of many entrepreneurs with global business.

It seems a broad based coalition in the UK including LabConRef uniparty wants us to focus on places like Italy, Switzerland, Dubai, Portugal or others.

You can not imagine how easy it is to set up there. It took us 3 weeks to negotiate taxes in Switzerland with a canton. You give them everything what you own and what you make and then have a discussion on charges. They are super welcoming and supportive and while not cheapest we have tax certainty in writing until 2035 to start with.

You will see the result in the uk tax book on Jan 31 2027 when the returns for 2025 26 have gone missing of people who on that day report they have left. Below is a small survey with less good data but a good summary of what is known so far.

I have another point of view. If we had a fully working and educated society (no welfare, no benefits) then the exodus of millionaires worried about their taxes rather than paying back to the society that has enabled their fortunes within the country are living should not affect much. For example, based on offer and demand, houses should be cheaper as the only ones who can afford them are gone so you do not need to earn like a banker to have a family.

I understand it is a pain and frustration to have to pay so many taxes to feed a bunch of useless benefits and welfare claimers where all cities are full of vagrants. Plus all the awful services from the NHS. There is no clear Return on Tax so why bother paying them?

We need to focus on and incentivise the job/business creation at all levels of society and make work pay. Anybody can develop a family business, and enable the next generation of millionaires perhaps with start-ups.
"It took us 3 weeks to negotiate taxes"

For most people, there is no opportunity to "negotiate" taxes. This is where the unfairness lies. I have no choice about paying my taxes at the rate the government sets (bar tinkering around the edges with ISAs and so on). But you apparently do.
That’s because he pays a lot of taxes. It’s like if you are a big client of a company, you get to talk to the CEO and negotiate better prices, faster deliveries etc, it’s normal.

The UHNW pays as much taxes as hundreds of people, they weigh more.

What’s maybe unfair is for the British UHNW who pays a loooot. But he probably already has moved to Monaco.
Plenty of jobs around, none of them pay well enough to take them…
That is what happens when the benefits are set higher than regular wages !
No one here is going to get out of bed to screw screws into iPhones etc. the low demand work we has was retail and hospitality but those are all dying due to the internet and over taxation of business rates. Never mind the new insane minimum wage levels which make it unprofitable to hire people.

We have no growth and no offer to people who could do it, so we are left in a zero sum game amplifying the problems.
But what makes the Premier League great is that Manchester United get their butts kicked by Brighton.
They also get kicked by Bournemouth and Wolves and Newcastle and Forest and …. Maybe it’s just easier to list the teams that Man U haven’t had a kicking from. 🤣🤣🤣
(Edited)
True. UK has been fascinated in the EU tax regime for so long, and Liz Truss was removed despite of her efforts of pushing UK to a low tax free market. The failures of Conservative Party will make them unelectable for 10 years at least. Well deserved!
The Tories have and still bring nothing but populist policies to the UK resulting in total failure and destruction of the Uk economy. Sawiris is right on that. Start with Brexit, what did we get out of it??? They lied to gullible voters who thought they will benefit from brexit and not have buyers’ remorse. Look at the dom/non-dom policy. Another live disaster in the making. These populist policies in the US and UK will destroy the respective economies for the benefit of a few ideological and dogmatic individuals. Where are the real statesmen/women??
Truss was utterly incompetent. She lacked the ability to communicate a coherent vision and bring anyone with her so it looked like debt fueled tax cuts and the people she expected to buy that debt said no thanks.

However Labour are a complete disaster. We can’t handle 10 years of them either - 5 is far too much. They have vandalised business, education, energy policy (net zero) and just making all of the problems worse.
The economic stiuation will be worse in Italy and Abu Dhabi. The five eyes are forming an economic block soon. It is premature to leave UK.
The US is already probing the UK from behind - with tariffs and more. Those five eyes will be of little use to anyone - including the members :)
Bye bye. Your tax affairs were likely structured such that you made few actual contributions to the UK economy anyway.
Not true, because he would have to pay tax on any UK income such as interest and he would have paid stamp duty on his properties and VAT on his purchases, and so too would his employees, who would have been UK nationals who paid income tax and NI.
There's no way a man with his business brilliance hasn't figured out a way to protect his assets from inheritance taxes. He simply doesn't want to pay annual taxes - which make him a parasitic freeloader. And , if Brits can't make up for losing 40 jobs they have more problems than they realize.
This was 40 jobs to go with one man's departure. Do you know how many are leaving
They changed the law so he couldn’t protect his wealth from inheritance tax. There isn’t some magic dodge short of tax evasion. You really are clueless. Why do you hold such strong opinions when you have zero facts? Or just be quiet whilst the adults are talking and learn something.
A real patriot. Like a lot of the ultra wealthy.
He isn’t going to be a patriot, because the UK is NOT his spiritual home. He will always call himself an Egyptian. I’m all for World wide taxation for us Brits because we should be patriots, but for HNW foreigners it’s about cutting a deal that makes them want to pay a lot of tax here , but not a UK citizen level of tax.
Alternatively, let’s just price them away and high five how we have less money for our NHS and elderly social care. Pure genius of Trumpian levels.
He isn't British !!
If you're criteria for patriotism is paying 40% IHT, you're going to realise the UK has very few patriots, almost none
(Edited)
High net worth or wealthy entrepreneurs have options. She should treat them like they are her best clients,” he added. “I don’t know any person in my circle who is not moving this April, or next April if [their children] have a school year or something like that.”
Interesting couple of lines. Basically admits the UK was being treated as a tax haven by wealthy foreign individuals. These people are not socially invested, simply an economic matter. Whether that matters I guess depends on your point of view. Personally I'd take the money.

The bet is plenty will simply pay more rather than make changes. There has to have been some analysis by both Tory/Lab governments that show theres no loss on this. Plenty of wealthy individuals have been engaged in an aggressive PR campaign to overturn the changes which makes me think many do not want to leave and are expecting to pay up.
Well reasoned. I can’t call it to be honest, but I hope they get the calculation right such that old system deliver less tax revenue than new system on existing non doms while also attracting new foreign tax payers to come.
I can’t help thinking this is going to hurt us , but maybe I’m just not a good poker player.
All of that analysis was pre the IHT tax change and even the. That analysis was wrong. You’ll see in a year or two.
These crooks can eff off to abu dhabi.. but once the recession hits and their snake oil isn't selling they will jet set back to safety. Then we should go full robespierre on them or atleast let them stay in the domicile they've chosen rather than accepting them back...out is out... the same happened around the time of the financial crisis where all of these effs were heading to dubai.. then the crisis hit and they ran with they had back to the euro shores leaving everything behind...since the arabs jail em for having outstanding debts.
Again I agree when we are talking about Brits who tart around for a low rate safe in the knowledge that they can come home when it all gets a bit too much. I would go full World Wide Tax like the US with tax treaties to avoid doubt taxation. If you don’t like that , then renounce your citizenship and at that point you are dead to us (as is the case for US Citizens).
However this article is about citizens from outside the UK who are incredibly successful and I’d quite like them to stay and pay tax contributions that dwarf the average high earning Brit. Should we cut them a deal, hell yeah !
How jejune.
UK feels closed for business, an overseas person looking to buy property is raped in stamp tax.
I’d really like to see a full cost benefit analysis of non doms leaving the country.
(Edited)
There are no benefits.
Just costs.....a lot.
one would hope there are benefits, and those need to be quantified or at least stated.
The benefits is what you can extract from the ones who have no choice but staying or decide to stay for whatever reason.

They probably have data based on Gordon Brown’s decision to limit non dom status to 15 years. They surely know how many people left because of that. The ratio of leave vs remain. The wealth levels of leave vs remain.
Wonder what these people actually pay in taxes. They probably contribute so little if their company does business elsewhere.
Exactly. His contributions to the UK economy likely limited to one or two high end properties and luxury goods. A (relative) drop in the ocean. Bye bye.
Do you think so? I’m guessing he probably pays at least a multiple of 100 times our tax contribution and he probably doesn’t demand welfare or healthcare or education. So yes, it feels good to give the bird to a really wealthy individual who gets a better tax deal than you and I. However , it’s still makes you and I poorer to pack him off to some other Country. He is an Egyptian, he is not a Brit and he does not owe this Country in the way you and I do.
Did you miss the part about £100M stadium expansion? Or the family office he used to run from London? Besides that, he will actually at least a few million in taxes
As opposed to the renowned competence of Egyptian governments.
he can move to dubai and he will face the risk of upsetting the wrong person and being locked up and have it confiscated.

MBS put them in a hotel or something if I recall properly
Thats a silly argument, instead of making an argument for why it is better to be in the UK for an entrepreneur its the luddite argument of "be scared of your options". The UK has to understand that with 5 million sponging off the welfare system it is not sustainable if we loose wealthy people at the rate we are currently.
It's a very real argument of you had any experience of living in outside first world countries. You lie in Abu Dhabi at the whim of the ruler. Rule of law is a relative term. Move to Africa or Latin America or most of Asia and see how the law is applied. After all the uproar in the US is because it is behaving like one of those countries (apologies to many of them that dont or try not to)
Not sure if you were satirising (and if so I apologise) but you know MBS is in Saudi, not Dubai, right?
The final paragraph or two is the crucial one - he has moved many very highly paid staff out of London and into UAE - this tax raid is going to reduce the tax take of the country not boost it as well as see less charitable donations - it is self harm driven by crazy ideology
The comments about the Tories being the ones that first chipped away at this golden goose is correct - I hope my wife ( non UK citizen) will go along and allow us to leave this sinking ship that has been sinking since Brexit / the Tories - Boris Johnson is a vandal that has destroyed the UK
For a second I did think that you were advocating for your wife to leave for tax reasons which did make me chuckle at what I thought was the punchline of ‘every cloud has a sliver lining’ Alas back to the non funny world of non dom tax , you are spot on; Boris was both a clown and an economic vandal!
I bet that Labour's incompetence will keep him out of UK.I suspect incompetence being a systemic trait of UK politics, no matter the party
The most damning phrase in here is: “High net worth or wealthy entrepreneurs have options. She should treat them like they are her best clients,” It speaks volumes about the disproportionate influence ultra high net worth individuals expect to have on politics and politicians.
No. What he is saying is - we are happy to contribute, but are not willing to be ravaged. He is drawing a line for the price to be paid.

I think that’s reasonable, no?
Exactly what is the problem with that statement?
Do you real prefer 45% of zero rather than say 30% of hundreds of billions of pounds?
Its jokers like you that keep the UK in the dog house.
Ultra high net worth individuals contribute little to the UK economy. There are many many pages of analysis you can find. The people we should be focusing on are those who start small and medium sized businesses who are the real engine for growth.
An owner of a medium sized business *IS* an ultra high net worth individual.
Spoken like someone with few assets themselves.
I think he's more worried about the 40% IHT implication. He's right. Where are his family going to find 40% of liquid assets to pay the IHT if he gets runover.
People with wealth have always had a disproportionate influence. That's the capitalist system we live in but it's a system that has also benefitted the majority by making everyone a lot better off.
Money, money, money
Must be funny
In the rich man's world
Money, money, money
Always sunny
In the rich man's world...
(Edited)
But it is rich men that pay for the NHS, welfare and the state pension for the rest of us, not poor ones.
It’s a myth to suggest the super rich pay most of the taxes.
"The super-rich are shifting massive amounts into wealth and income from wealth, where taxation is even more disproportionate. This is how we get situations where millionaires like former Prime Minister Rishi Sunak can pay a tax rate of only 23% on £2.2m of income. As you get higher up the scale of the super-rich, the distortion becomes even more extreme. In 2024, billionaire James Dyson, 5th on the Sunday Times Rich List, paid just 0.68% of their total wealth in tax."
That smile — so natural.
An odious character who was a cheerleader for the overthrow of a democratically elected government in Egypt via a military coup.
Do you mean the Muslim Brotherhood? I wonder if there are any reasons why a Coptic Christian family might be skeptical.
Agreed. Coptics have much to fear from political Islam and rightly so.
They were after his family for tax evasion. I’ve no idea if this was justified, or not.
That is democracy. Sometimes democratic elections throw up leaders that are odious themselves but is that a valid reason for backing jackbooted generals to murder tens of thousands of civilians and impose a dictatorship on the entire country?
So, would you be backing a coup in Hungary? And what happens if National Front win elections in France - coup there too?
For those who can read, it is well known that dictatorships lead to more extremism in the long term. Let even the unpleasant people take power if fairly elected in a democratic election, and let the people decide.
It is blatantly racist to suggest tht non-white races should only be ruled by dictators.
We Brits do self harm very well . For now only the USA and tariffs do better. Brexit causes enormous self harm .Huge barriers to trade. Non dom clampdown drives rich people away. Think of what these former citizens paid for goods and services, for children’s school fees . Huge expenditure. Now all gone . And there is non- refundable VAT for tourists who flock to Paris and Milan where luxury goods are 20% cheaper than in London . Pathetic does not do it justice
Ultra high net worth individuals contribute little to economies. Lots of data you can find if want to educate yourself.
Give us a link pleaaaase!

I’d love to understand how a billionaire who invested in a football club and created a company with 40 probably well paid executives, bought a super expensive mansion with lots of staff, furnitures, art, cars, spends probably millions each year for his family’s lifestyle, VAT paid…. does not contribute to the economy.
I assume this was included in the FT just for the pile on?
Fly to UK, stay in nice hotels, consume lots of goods and services, pay lots of VAT, help support lots of jobs in leisure and entertainment industry. Pop to Paris or Milan, then fly back out of UK and claim back the VAT on your luxury goods. Not so fast, say the geniuses at the Treasury. No VAT refund for you! And a big fat Green Tax for flying out of Heathrow on top. Ha!
Result, high spending Asian tourists fly to Paris instead, or Milan and pop to London for a couple of days. Tax take goes down.
Live half the year in UK, fly around the world for business and pleasure. Keep a large house in the UK (or two), employ lots of staff directly or indirectly. Send you kids to fee paying schools, pay higher fees for prestige universities. Support the arts, the artisans and the estate agents. Pay lots of stamp duty. Not so fast say the geniuses at the Treasury. No avoiding IHT for you!
Result, high spending non doms move to Milan instead. Occasionally pop over to stay at the London pied at terre. Housing market stagnates, all associated trades stall, no benefit at lower end. Tax take goes down.
Treasury moves on to next target....
But the proletariat feel it’s not fair! They cannot see past their own prejudices to make pragmatic decisions. Envy politics seems to be the winning formula in the UK lately.
Someone has to pay for freedom they take full advantage of. Why should the Uber Rich get to reap the benefits without paying their fair share?
They pay 10 to 100 times more than the average Brit. Where is this not fair?
Not to mention the business rates produced by Bond Street, the hotels and the airport which are linked to rental values - and never get factored in.
(Edited)
The Conservatives are basically New Labour these days. Tax, tax.

Labour are like the SDLP. Very left. Tax, tax and more tax.

They are all also terrible at running things. For example the new aircraft carriers should have had catapults. This is Camerons fault. By not having them they now have plans with half the operational range of ones that do. But lobbyists got in the way too easily. The MoD also perennially useless at buying things.
(Edited)
A few oddities. He is not moving his businesses from the UK; they were all run from Luxembourg anyway. He is moving the family office to Abu Dhabi despite Lux being a safe legal jurisdiction which last I checked, was pretty capital friendly. There is something else operating there.

He has clearly made a large investment in Abu Dhabi itself and is an Arabic speaker.

The inheritance tax point is really moot. Any privately held business will struggle with inheritance, tax or no tax. Many countries have IHT. If you die there, they get a piece of you. If you dont like it, transfer before your death or sell. The taxes are the same. If trusts are your thing, they have their own issues. If he dies in Abu Dhabi, expect the locals to take a big cut.

As for English law without English weather, good luck to you in court in Abu Dhabi if you fall out with the ruling family.
Your comment is nonsense. Due to the res/non-dom historical anomaly, the UK accidentally found herself the most desirable place to live in the world for the world’s richest individuals, despite the weather. These individuals typically are natural born investors. They tend to invest in what they knew. Which increasingly became the UK. Where they lived.
If it ain’t broke, why fix it?
No, the government of the UK decided it needed to be fixed. And so enacted policies designed to drive these investors to live and invest in other countries.
While they were busily doing that, they decided to go for the whole enchilada, cancelling off-shore trusts and implementing various other rules designed to capture the inheritances of these international individuals.
For such individuals, the message was clear—Britain doesn’t want or need you, or your money. As a consequence, the various individuals, with their families, about 6k persons, got the clear message. All have quietly left. Most for italy. Some for Switzerland, both countries happy to have their money. Both countries amazed at the stupidity of Britain.
One thing, btw, the former res non-dom says is untrue—it’s not the Tories fault, it’s 100% labour’s genius idea, beginning middle and end. The policy the Tories enacted was borrowed, hook line and sinker, from a secret pre-election Labour white paper. He’s saying it’s the Tories, simply so Labour, being now in power, doesn’t punish him. By deviating from their official line—namely, that the res/non-dommers have all decided to stay. Simply delusional.
Excellent pony’s you’ve made above, Labour’s people finally being able to put into practice their policy nurtured by Hunt.
We’ve seen that Hunt has been a total failure in everything. His six years at health left our NHS a nondescript rubbish organisation fit only for privatisation, (those parts of it which remained public sector).
Public ownership just doesn’t deliver and , as we see here is a major contributor to the UK’s side into worthlessness slnce WWll.
@ Glooscap and E and Oe: the writing was on the wall for the non dom regime for some time. Ever since the Permira exec said that he paid less tax than his cleaning lady it has been doomed. You simply cannot maintain these kind of incentives in a democracy. Its not Labour - George Osborne would have done this eventually even if he had kept his job and is on the record on this.

Permanent non-dom tax status to be abolished, chancellor announces

I worked in an investment business with UK born and non doms working side by side. It was poisonous as the UK folks were being taxed to the hilt in their own country while the non-doms, like myself, were able to use trusts to shelter most of our income. This was pre 2004, when the regime was incredibly beneficial.

It really screws those who vote, so once the media let in light on this, it cannot last for long. Something similar will happen in Italy before long. Wait till an opposition party gets a full picture, and it will change. Why would ordinary Italians tolerate it ? Why should ordinary UK taxpayers defend the country so that the mega rich can feel secure ?

I remember Getty leaving the US to go to Ireland a few years back … it did not become a flood. The gag used to be that Sean Connery always held Marbella East for the SNP, as he dodged taxes for decades.

A few folks will always move around. I gather Milan property is skyrocketing. It does not actually lead to a lot of social benefits.

What does matter is tax incentives for domestic UK entrepreneurs. That still needs work.
You might want to check out the inheritance tax rates in Luxembourg. Very attractive indeed.
Why do y’all feel entitled to take a substantial portion of this family’s wealth?

He’s Egyptian, not British, and made most of his money outside the UK. He settled down in London, bringing jobs and investment but when Britain altered the bargain he decided to leave.
Actually the U.K. gave him refugee when his country was in turmoil. Wouldn’t have happened if he’d not been wealthy.
(Edited)
‘The most left leaning conservative government in history’ - what of the progressive policies of ‘Red Dave’ Cameron and the ‘evidence based social(ist) policies’ of Margaret ‘Trotsky’ Thatcher including needle exchanges to accelerate the decline of the western decadence? Odd framing within the article
“You can’t blame Labour,” said Sawiris. “This was all in the making for 10 years of incompetence by the most left-leaning Conservative party in history.”
Says it all.
The Conservatives were a blight on this country.
Thank heavens they are in opposition and will be there for a very long time.
(Edited)
The socialist conservative government was bad (it was why I left) but you’ll note the capital and talent flight is getting worse, not better, following the general election.

Labour are a continuation of the Tory’s “more tax and spend” agenda - which is of no interest to anyone who wants to build anything.

Ireland pulled over businesses with their attractive corporate tax rate. The Gulf pulled in people with their attractive income tax rate. Italy and Switzerland pulled in people with their attractive inheritance tax rate.

Britain is heading down a very dark path as it repeats the mistakes of socialist 1970s Britain - the difference this time being there are LOTS of more attractive places to move to.

As ever, socialists always run out of other people’s money.
MayI suggest the United States as a preferred destination?
There you can avoid taxes ('defund the IRS') and exercise real political influence.
as the 'system is rigged.'
It doesn’t matter so much whether Sawiris or Crown Estates manage Aston Villa. What matters is that many 1000s of taxpayers leave and that UK attracts immigrants with benefits who then are not even allowed to work. This will not go well.



Your link doesn't mention anything about immigrants with benefits. In case you are unaware, you can't claim benefits on migrant visas (e.g. tier 1 and 2) and you also have to pay a superannuation charge to use the NHS (1k per year, although most immigrants are fit and barely use the NHS).
Danny, you are correct (I’m on skilled worker visa myself).

BUT
I make 3x London average, but if I brought a family of 3-4 with me (which lots of people do), my contribution in taxes to economy would be less than what is taken out. A bit outrageously, Ukranian pensioners who came in 2022 are entitled to UK pensions.
100k+ asylum seekers are being provided hotels & food daily, and are being barred from working (most are able bodied healthy peeps and actually work - contributing to tax evasion, human trafficking & prostitution). These guys come from France because they know they will have a very comfortable life in London, live in a hotel/council provided flat, have all expenses covered & earn 2-3k as a side job on top of it.

Question is, what % of legal immigrants are contributing more as a family vs. taking out?

I’m not sure most taxpayers realise just how much they are being taken for a ride.
Maria, I understand your point. However there’s a big difference between a migrant and a refugee. The former falls under the Geneva Convention of 1951 and signatory states such as the UK have obligations, hence why the case of Ukraine you are highlighting. There’s are always rotten apples, but the world is not in a good state at the moment, leaving many to have to flee conflicts. If the UK doesn’t want refugees then it should be more proactive in ending the conditions leading to conflicts and reinvest in aid and face its colonial legacy.
Danny the even a convention is not fit for purpose in this age. The country is being played and bleeding hearts are gaslighting us.
Its only fair that Dubai and others benefit from these brilliant financiers and entrepreneurs. Their commitment to their place of residence will doubtless generate much and contribute to the development of a healthy, democratic community.
No one moves to Dubai in hope of finding a democratic society.

We just want good healthcare, safe streets, low tax burden and a functioning city.

Unavailable in the UK, so ambitious people have no choice but to leave.
Another wealthy, industrious person (and family) encouraged to leave the U.K. due to crippling tax levels
The poor b'stards! Can no longer afford a second shooting estate..
You people really don’t understand wealth, do you ?

He’s an Egyptian who made money in construction and infrastructure projects in the developing world, why on earth would you equate that with some outdated British aristocratic past time.

You Labour people really live in an alternative reality based on a class system that no longer even exists.
The politics of envy. In the good old days these numpties would have stuck to The Sun and not bothered us here.
Like if you had any clue about how the economy works...thanks for the joke!
Decent aristos sold their shooting estates to the nouveaux riches decades ago to pay death duties. As any well-heeled oligarch would know ...
If we truly care for something, we will make certain sacrifices to sustain and preserve it.

Super wealth gives the freedom to make life choices that aren’t solely about saving money.
Or, it should do.

The Uk isn’t in schtuk just because these people might leave, just as it wasn’t doing brilliantly purely once, because they came.

There is a lot more to it than that, but they will whinge and lobby to get the best deal for themselves at the expense of others, all the while.

Have a great time back in the Middle East, where everything is doubtless perfect and the rich are untroubled by infrastructure costs or the wants and needs of their less fortunate brethren..
Fine, except who is going to pay for all the spending that the which is left demands?
You’re looking through a lens of ‘fairness’ as if life is fair. It’s not. He inherited his fortune and his descendants will all live in unearned luxury. Get over it. The pragmatic thinking overcomes this and decides how we keep these tax payers ‘cos it’s going to get a lot worse if we don’t.
Two journalists to publish a puff piece - in the era of AI no less!
It can be rather cool and rainy in the uk especially after the summer.
Incompetent Conservative government absolutely correct
The tax he paid will alone be more than the incomes of all the folk moaning about him in the “comments section”. lol
(Edited)
True. But our relationship is to the country's shared values, not to the HMRC tax code.
Let’s use those shared values to pay for the NHS then…
Good on him.
Plenty of comments simplifying the cause and effect of non-dom disappearing.

Yes, this has already and will continue to drive an exodus of well-off foreigners most who have been paying significant UK taxes in all shapes and form under the existing regime and often much more annually than the average UK taxpayer.

It is true that for those with little attachment to UK and/or who might already have been on the way out, the change in tax code has made the decision easy.

It is understandable however that those with long-standing ties to the country and a desire to stay feel like the tide is against them. Increasing tax load on all fronts (CT, income tax, private school fees etc etc) in addition to the removal of non-dom is not an easy pill to swallow.

A partial reversal of the policy that goes beyond the new FIG regime is needed, and soon.
This is not true - British people are leaving too.

I moved to Dubai 2 years ago, and there’s been an explosion of British white collar workers/ entrepreneurs in their late 20s/ early 30s who’ve moved in the last 6 months. The city increasingly feels British.

The UK doesn’t offer a good deal for ambitious people - foreign or British, and everyone seems to be either leaving or has left. And I just see Dubai - I can only imagine the rates of people fleeing to the US/ Australia/ Singapore etc.
(Edited)
Yes, Brits are leaving too and nothing has been stated to the contrary.

But this is clearly not driven by non-dom benefits disappearing.
(Edited)
Well a lot of it is driven by uncompetitive taxation and high tax payers leaving compounds it.

If I didn’t have kids in school here I don’t think I’d stay and likely won’t once they are done. I’m not really interested in being taxed to death funding promises the boomer generation made to themselves without actually paying for any of it. They all established themselves a nice low tax regime where pensioners got sod allwhen they were working, but now they are pensioners it’s apparently a great injustice how low state pensions are. Meanwhile anyone earning well now can only put q0k a year in a pension talk about pulling the drawbridge up.
(Edited)
Quite. In fact, net migration of Brits has been -ve for a few years now :-)
This was a useful article, a canary in the coalmine type. But it was unnecessarily diluted with more than needed details about the sports club towards the end.
Felt like copy paste of some other draft about this guy.
What should have been provided is how much is this policy affecting wealthy people to leave, how many already have. Changes over years.

It is still called Financial Times?
(Edited)
See link below w some soft numbers based on survey.

This has been reported many times before and I found it interesting that even investors in UK like Ineos/ ManU and this one came to the same conclusion while keeping assets here ( which are obviously subject to UK tax incl IHT). Generally more nuance would help the debate.

Yes it is, and there are some AzureMarrone, aka Aston Villa fans, who read it. We are interested to know that expansion of Villa Park to 50000 is still in the plan. The last four teams left in the Champions league play at stadia with at least 20000 greater capacity than Aston Villa. The gap in revenue is critical.
These super rich freeloaders will they now be paying tax anywhere?
“Freeloader”.

That’s an interesting term for someone who’s paid hundreds of millions in tax to thr exchequer during his time in the UK.

What do you call the 50% of the British population who pay no tax?
I suppose you think half the polulation don’t pay (for example) VAT.
They are freeloaders on the net taxpayers.

Just like you are.
A financial expert who thinks that 40% of your assets above at least £1 mn is "half your net assets"? Arithmetic is surpringly not a strong point.
(Edited)
If all a country means to you is the tax regime, then that says a lot.
Please do leave, but spare us the homilies about 'loving' that country.
(Edited)
You can love a country and still leave.

I love the UK, even if I had to leave to achieve my dreams. Ukraines flee their country - do you suppose they hate it?

Obviously a war is more of a push factor than a punishing tax regime - but the principle is the same.
Sorry - we can do without these financial tourists driving policy. Just wait until the relocated employees lose their jobs or get ill - they will high tail it back to UK.
(Edited)
Why would they return to the UK? The weather? The crime ridden streets? The “healthcare service”?

The sheer amount of money they’ll save by not handing half their income to the state will ensure they’ll have plenty of time to consider their next step before returning to the UK.
Thevquestion is whether the net tax take goes up not if a number of people leave.
We plainly need Laffer curves for every tax levied to establish which side of the postulated maximum each tax is at. If some taxes are too high to take optimum levels, sone must surely be too low, or is it now an act of faith that all taxes are a problem. It is worth bearing in mind that fiat currency is valueless if there are either no taxes or the government can't collect. Fiat currency only works because you can pay your taxes in it and don't need to hold specie.
Ferris Bueller's economics teacher says no to the Voodoo Laffer Curve. The actor is apparently the son of a real economist.
I just came to say, Jersey is lovely this time of year, for those who still want easy access to London and no ridiculous IHT law
He's grateful for the UK giving him refuge and financial opportunities and generous perks. He can see the country's finances are a mess thanks to the previous Tory government's whipsaw mismanagement. But he won't stick around to roll up his sleeves and assist the country.
He has no interest in paying for past and future government mistakes. Why should he?
It’s the job of the politicians. That’s exactly how a democracy works.
(Edited)
If you’d like to move it seems like what sounds like his cousin has already set up the Chelsea in the mountains according to the FT today


Andermatt Swiss Alps, 51 per cent owned by Egyptian-Montenegrin businessman Samih Sawiris and 49 per cent by his company Orascom, is unique in Switzerland because it has been exempted from restrictions on foreign buyers buying property, making it a barometer of foreign demand.
It is the brother of the interviewee in this article who is developing Andermatt. I have my favourite place in Switerzland to ski and have never been to Andermatt, but my Italian ski guide on my most recent Swiss holiday had just come back from there and was very impressed by the Chedi, where his client lived. I note, however, that several people say that Andermatt can be foggy. But so can Milan.
Also your link doesn't work and I have a typo in my comment. It must be a bank holiday. Try this:
“On April 7, if a bus hit me [then] my family is bankrupt because they have to pay 40 some per cent in taxes, because my assets are not liquid. They have to go through a fire sale to pay that bill.”

I left in a hurry for the exact same reasons, although I'm far from being as wealthy as he is. I now have the good food, good weather, beautiful beaches, a welcoming atmosphere although I absolutely love England (and of course Scotland) and always will.

Everything he says is spot on.
Fully agree with you. Unfortunately, there are people who envy any form of wealth and really do not wish to understand or acknowledge just how much entrepreneurs contribute to public finances, whether they are UK domiciled or not.
Exactly. As a side note I'd tend to think that Milton Friedman was right about freedom and capitalism. Hayek nailed it too.
if a bus hit me [then] my family is bankrupt because they have to pay 40 some per cent in taxes, because my assets are not liquid. They have to go through a fire sale to pay that bill.”
They's have to sell some assets. So what? It's not a 'fire sale'.
It’s a fire sale because they’ll have to sell in time before the HMRC tax deadline - which any buyer will know.

If I said you have 6 months to sell your house, you can hope someone will buy for the true value, but at the end of the day you’ll have sell for whatever to avoid prison.

Now imagine that scale of challenge with an entire £9B estate.
(Edited)
At the risk of repetition - what are the numbers in the tax change business case and how are the actuals stacking up against that?

Is it a secret? Why hasn't the FT got the information?

What is the point of these articles without any data?

If all they are here for is tax breaks, then good riddance. Absolutely no way should they be allowed to come back without penalty.
And then not all is bad. Even the garbage is being collected on time in Chelsea today.
But now the British taxpayers are going to have to pay more for it.
Non dom expires after 15 years...what am I missing?
(Edited)
I predict further falls in prices of prime London real estate, and continued fall in the huge stamp duty payments they make.

Oh well. Just means the rest of us pay more.
And are lower house prices bad given the housing crisis?
Out with the wealthy taxpayers - in with the scroungers.
But he moved so he didn't pay tax. That's a tax dodger not a tax payer
Of course he paid tax. He paid tax on all of his UK income and so did the 45 people who worked for him. Cumulatively it is well north of £10m a year.
Sounds like a decent chap and I’m sure he is. Will he be missed? His staff be looking for new positions. Did he pay top money. I should think so.And ; just out of curiosity,; dose he and his ilk pay any tax to any body anywhere.?
His staff won’t be looking for new jobs - they’re moving to Abu Dhabi.
If my Dubai apartment complex is anything to go by, Rachel Reeves is going to be surprised next year when the tax receipts come in.

It’s not just wealthy billionaires moving here - but young high earning white collar Brits on £150-£250k. It’s a financial no brainer, that allows you to clear your student loan and start building for the future.

I’ve been here for 2 years, and there’s been a particular explosion of British relocations since the General Election.

Most of us plan to leave the UAE in the medium term, but few ever plan to return to the UK.
I guess in Dubai, the student loan is not deducted.
It’s not - but equally I return to the UK regularly, so would never have evaded.

But it’s remarkably easy to clear the debt when you have no tax. For the first year, I paid an effective tax of “25%” just on student loans to clear it quickly (interest rates on the loan were almost 10% for a while).

Now that it’s cleared, life is much easier. Moving to Dubai for a year is worth it if only used to clear your debt - immediately can return to the UK with a 9% reduced tax rate. Not that anyone could stomach going from 0% to 50% tax; way too painful.
Better profits elsewhere forced him to quit,
Well, lower taxes to be exact.
So we now get nothing from him.
Genius.
The U.K. is heading towards Nordic levels of taxation with US levels of public services and infrastructure. The loss of large net contributors like this make it even worse. Government incompetence- he’s right on that.
A tragic outcome of primary school level understanding of basic supply and demand economics across the political sphere in the UK.

Well-educated rich people can go and live anywhere they want, creating businesses, jobs – and, most importantly, tax revenues, which help pay for public services. The UK needs tax policies to attract their capital investment and their consumption to support innovation and economic activity. Otherwise they will go elsewhere and contribute to the UK’s economic competitors, because they can.

Conversely, uneducated poor people know they can enter the UK as illegal immigrants and live for free at ordinary tax payers’ expense, draining the economy and stretching public services to breaking point. The UK needs to have secure borders and harsh penalties in place to deter these illegal immigrants, to remove their incentive to come in the first place.

Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.
Co, uneducated poor people know they can enter the UK as illegal immigrants and live for free at ordinary tax payers’ expense, draining the economy and stretching public services to breaking point
But it’s worth saying one of the many measures introduced to ‘deter’ asylum seekers from coming here was to prevent them from working and therefore make them entirely dependent on the state.

The honest assessment is that none of the parties know how to deal with the problem, and the more successful systems in the world rely on having international waters between them and the next country…something the UK doesn’t have.
Migration needs sorting out for sure but it is not the cause of economic decline.
Good riddance to leeches like him. Lived in the UK for the safety its laws provide and amazing lifestyle afforded to rich people in central London. But doesn't want to contribute in any meaningful way.
Why is he a leech? The UK didn’t pay for his education but he must have paid a lot of U.K. tax over the years (VAT etc) as well as his investments and employment here. You have it wrong.
Im sure he's paid exponentially more tax to HMRC than you. But glad to see you'll willingly pick up the slack and pay much more to cover the shortfall after these people have left.
Leech? His taxes, jobs, investment will outweigh anything he received
Please move to Switzerland or Singapore and let the poor English increase the taxes on the middle class to pay for the poor ( never mind infrastructure )
Both Switzerland and Singapore spend their money on its people - Amazing infrastructure and health care - and in Singapore 90% ( yes ninety ) own their own property which is sized based on family size…
Go figure
Nonsense regarding Singapore. In 2020, 78.7% of residents lived in public housing. I once took a bus in the wrong the direction there and so got off in the middle of one of these housing projects and went to a 7-11 store to ask for directions. The people could not have been nicer and more friendly, and I was walked by a resident to a stop for a bus that would take me where I wanted to go in the town centre. In many other countries, including parts of the UK, that could have been a Bonfire of the Vanities moment.
The poor are all criminals? Don't worry about stereotypes or generalisations!
Having once lived next door to a murderer as a child in England, I know that danerous criminals exist and try to avoid them whenever possible.
(Edited)
We now live in the year 2025 and it is up to almost 90% - people are happy and they can vote in early May 2025. In the UK they can vote as well I believe but can you see any improvements overt the past 20 years ?
Never read that people are snatching iPhones in the street - pls wake up UK
Touché. I concede that your data might be more up to date, although you don't give a source. Having once walked down Nassim Road on the way to the Botancial Gardens, I thought that might be a nice place to live. Then I saw the prices, and now there is a 60% surcharge for purchases by foreigners. Anyway, I prefer Europe.

Regarding the relative lack of crime in Singapore, I was taught at school in England many years ago, that anyone who spat out bubble gum on the street would be caned, which I thought a good idea every time I stood on some. There was still caning at my school then. Anyway, corporal punishment has gone both here and there but Changi prison still sounds like a hellhole.

As for what has improved in London in the past 20 years, there is a bit less pollution as vehicles belching out diesel fumes have disappeared from central London.
for umpteenth time: Healthcare in Switzerland (like theUS) is good but expensive.
Roger - almost all people are insured ( self pay ) and if you can’t afford it for some reason there is a Govt/local town subsidy BUT most people are embarrassed to claim a subsidy. Get it.
He said everything most of knew it was going to happen but how many of such people will leave without an interview in FT. Loss to our economy will be significant and no one should underestimate. These are highly capable global networkers, wealth creators and tax payers. Their taxes and charitable donations help many communities. What is probably worse is that our government will realise their mistake by next April but trust is lost and they won’t be coming back . Was it worth it for a quick political point, never.
Yep. They will see it only by Jan 31 2027 because only then they will count the missing returns for 25/26. Many founders left in March of this year only so will still have to file tax for 24/25 next Jan.
Where he is moving his tax residency to? AD or Italy? It can’t be both.
Whichever is cheaper, presumably.
I thought you could get insurance to pay IHT on death. It is expensive and has to be paid for the rest of your life but it avoids fire sales of assets so can be good tax planning. Surely a billionaire could afford such an arrangement? Pity the lesser mortals
An insurance policy to cover £4.5B tax liability?

Cheaper to just relocate.
This is an article on a billionaire. But regarding fire sale of assets, if you fall under a bus, it applies also to far less rich people who have two properties, say, and some £100ks of more liquid assets, and wish to leave a proportion to their children and not just to their spouse (which is not IHT taxable); when hit by a bus, their executors also have to fire-sale to be able to pay their kids’ inheritance at the 40% rate. Which means selling their property asap and probably at a huge discount because still subject to probate, which comes after the tax has been paid. My point is not just how exorbitant IHT is in the UK but how HMRC makes it difficult for a deceased’s estate to pay it: you can only realise the value of a fixed or corporate asset after you have paid IHT on it.
How shocked the world might be if the children of these wealthy individuals might achieve something off their own back.
Bitter much?
(Edited)
Hi Rich Kid. 👋. Said with love. Xx. Happy Easter one and all.
grow up
How heavy is that chip on your shoulder?
Our differing opinions can coexist without the world imploding. We aren't in primary school any longer.
Presumably you achieved nothing off anyones back including your own
The juvenile zingers are flowing free and fast in the FT comments section, as ever.
Take that as a yes then.
Another direct hit! I don't think I'll recover from this one.
oh dear, the m-o-w-o-n strikes again
(Edited)
It would be interesting to do research on how “wealthy” people’s kids do in life (measured in many ways, including through their own efforts) as it is always idly assumed that “wealthy” people’s kids are slackers. Please prove it to me - and that they are more slackers than the unfortunate (no sarcasm intended) kids of people on the dole, who choose to go the dole route themselves too. I’m not judging anyone but am tired of the assumption that rich kids (whose parents might have houses that have grown in value to over £1million or so - not so difficult in the UK, as we all well know) are always slackers. That is a misconception and I am sure that only the few are slackers. Many follow in their parents’ hard-working-want-to-succeed ethos and work life. So let’s please cut the lazy cr*p assumption that rich kids are always slackers.
ie. nepo-kids get a bad press.........
He is the child of a wealthy individual. His dad was one of the richest men in Egypt.