Ciara Nugent in Buenos Aires, Michael Stott in Rio de Janeiro and Joseph Cotterill in London
Published
|Updated
253
Get ahead with daily markets updates.
Less than six months ago, US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent was in Buenos Aires, congratulating President Javier Milei for “bringing Argentina back from the precipice”, as the libertarian secured more than $40bn in loans from the IMF and multilateral lenders to bolster his government.
Now, with political and economic mis-steps sparking panic in Argentina’s markets, the South American nation is once again on the brink, and the Trump administration is preparing to bail out its ideological ally.
In an apparent attempt to halt a sell-off of Argentine assets, Bessent announced on Monday that the Trump administration “stands ready to do what is needed” to support Argentina and that “all options for stabilisation are on the table”.
So how has Milei’s self-proclaimed economic miracle come so close to unravelling?
The libertarian economist, whose heroes include free-market evangelist Milton Friedman, scored early successes. His drastic austerity programme balanced the budget and slashed annual inflation, from a peak of 289 per cent in April 2024, to 34 per cent in August.
But economists point to one big error: obsessed with keeping inflation down at all costs, Milei kept the peso’s value artificially strong, which hurt economic growth, sucked in imports and prevented Argentina from building the stock of dollars it needs to repay a mountain of foreign debt.
“It’s a small blanket problem: the government covered itself too much on the inflation side, and didn’t cover itself on the reserves side, leaving it vulnerable to a political shock,” said Guido Sandleris, a former head of Argentina’s central bank and professor of economics at Johns Hopkins University and Buenos Aires’ Torcuato di Tella.
Javier Milei gestures energetically on stage before giving a speech, with people around him photographing and filming the moment.
Milei during a campaign speech this month before his party lost badly in Buenos Aires local elections © Getty Images
That shock came on September 7, when Milei’s libertarians suffered an unexpected landslide defeat at local elections in Buenos Aires province, which is home to more than a third of Argentines and had been seen as a bellwether for national midterm elections on October 26. 
The result hit markets already nervous about a corruption scandal ensnaring Milei’s sister and chief of staff, Karina, a breakdown of his alliances with the centrist opposition, and a series of erratic monetary policy moves, including interest rate increases, that boosted the peso but sapped economic activity.
The peso plunged almost 10 per cent in a fortnight, hitting the bottom of an exchange rate band adopted in April when Milei relaxed Argentina’s strict currency controls after securing a $20bn loan from the IMF.  
Fears mounted among local investors that the government would have to abandon the band and devalue the peso, compounding demand for dollars and accelerating the run on the currency. The central bank spent $1.1bn in three days last week to prop it up.
The dollar sales, in turn, unnerved bondholders, who fretted that the government was burning through scarce hard currency reserves it may eventually need to repay debts, sending bond prices plummeting.
The central bank’s foreign currency reserves — net of liabilities such as loans and money backing consumers’ deposits — stand at just $5bn, according to local financial broker GMA Capital. The government has missed IMF targets on rebuilding reserves as it delayed buying dollars to avoid dragging down the peso.
“The election loss pulled away the veil, revealing all the problems that had been hidden,” said Carlos Melconian, an economist and former head of Banco Nación, Argentina’s national bank, citing Milei’s “completely inconsistent” exchange rate policies and his “lack of interest in political agreements”.
2025*
Header logo

Argentina accounts for a third of the IMF's overall lending

Outstanding IMF credit, Argentina

Value (SDR bn)Share of total (%)
Milei was given some relief on Monday. Bessent’s offer of support, due to be discussed at a Tuesday meeting between him, Trump and Milei, helped calm markets, with the peso rebounding 6 per cent and yields on Argentina’s dollar debt, which move inversely to prices, falling 3.7 per cent. 
At the same time, Milei announced a temporary elimination of Argentina’s big taxes on agricultural exports, incentivising exporters to sell some of billions of dollars' worth of stockpiled crops and boosting the central bank’s access to dollars.
“They stopped the haemorrhaging,” said Nery Persichini, head of research at GMA Capital, adding that Monday’s moves might be enough to keep the peso away from its lower limit ahead of the midterm elections, which would shield the central bank’s reserves.
But analysts warned US help, on top of the billions in multilateral loans Argentina has already received, would not solve the deeper political and economic challenges that drove Milei into crisis.
A large crowd fills a city avenue in Buenos Aires holding banners and flags during a demonstration supporting increased education and health funding.
Demonstrators in Buenos Aires last week. Argentina’s lower house voted by more than two-thirds to reject Milei’s vetoes on a bill to boost the public university budget and another to boost health spending © Tomas Cuesta/Bloomberg
“You cannot fix Argentina at this point only with the availability of more international official financing,” said Alejandro Werner, director of Georgetown University’s Americas Institute. As head of the IMF’s western hemisphere department, Werner oversaw Argentina’s record-breaking $57bn bailout in 2018.
The US’s Exchange Stabilisation Fund, which Bessent says can be tapped to help Buenos Aires, has more than $200bn in assets. But the vast majority of this cannot easily be accessed, and the fund only has around $22bn of liquid securities.
Werner added: “Financing from the US will not be sufficient to stabilise Argentina unless a new political coalition is formed that will support Argentina’s economic programme.”
Milei has alienated moderate opposition allies in congress through his aggressive local election campaign strategy. They have sided with the leftwing Peronist movement to approve a series of spending increases in recent weeks, unnerving investors.
The government’s efforts to rebuild alliances following the Buenos Aires drubbing have stalled, as powerful provincial governors wait to negotiate until after the midterms.
Joaquín Cottani, an economist who served as deputy to economy minister Luis Caputo for the first six months of Milei’s presidency and left over differences on currency policy, said US support “will only help” if the government also implements “consistent exchange rate and monetary policy”.
Those included floating the peso, implementing a plan to buy reserves, and controlling interest rates, he added. “I expect the Treasury will make those firm conditions of its support before it gives Argentina access to a single dollar.”
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025. All rights reserved.

Promoted Content

Comments

Comment guidelines

Please keep comments respectful. Use plain English for our global readership and avoid using phrasing that could be misinterpreted as offensive. By commenting, you agree to abide by our community guidelines and these terms and conditions. We encourage you to report inappropriate comments.
Comments are closed on this story.
Let that peso go!
Oh dear, and I thought the market was infallible.
Milei, like Trump, despises political compromise or the search for it. He has made a political solution impossible, which in turn prevents the economy from improving.
Why don’t they just impose capital controls like Malaysia did in 1997?
(Edited)
Because so much Argentine money is already abroad. Also last time it did that it crashed the economy and triggered a default. Argentina was effectively out of the international markets for 20 years which is one of the reasons it has so little FX
It seems imf money and now T’s lifeline will all be used by the rich to buy $s, sell pesos
Mind boggles at the quality of eco management.
He played against the markets and lost. In addition you do not fight inflation by fudging the thermometer.
supporting (buying cheap) Argentina means securing control on crop exports in a collateral blow to China. a smart move in order to close in on latin america and contain China
No one saw that coming. Economist. That says everything. Milton Friedman- the lunatic. This is further proof that economics is a fake subject. Combine that with a butter and hey presto or should it be peso?
Actually plenty of people saw this coming. His FX band was an open invitation to shorting at the first sign of trouble. His failure to undo export taxes imposed by the peronists was incomprehensible. The last 35 years provides a clear guide on what not to do and what can go wring. Milei had no plan B and traders and critics could see that.
I was being sarcastic. Weird about the inevitable when he was a few months into his presidency. Hey Presto. Rabbit out of hat.
There is nothing wrong with economics as a subject. But there can be a lot of economic THEORIES that can be wrong-headed and that fail in practice (depending on the structural and political environment of the country in question).
Trump should give Milei some advice on bankruptcy.
Another bailout!? How about filling for bankruptcy and moving on. Countries should be allowed to file for bankruptcy! Just do not lend them after they go bankrupt.
I agree with you on the subject that countries should be allowed to file for bankruptcy and have a fresh start. Maybe no new credit, but without the burden of previous decades. That will force them to have a balanced budget.
BETTER TO TURN TO TRUMP THAN TO CHINA!

MAGA
👊🇺🇸
(Edited)
Trump the globalist, what a hypocrite
Working and following Argentina for 25 years and nothing ever changes... They should not be allowed to print any money and go back silver coins (can’t afford gold) and barter…
They stopped printing pesos over a year ago, which explains the drastically decreasing inflation trend.
He and Trump share the same unbelievable shamelessness. Two utter fools falling into each others arms when their incompetence defeats them. Trump will fail too.
As I recall, inflation was in high double digits before Milei took over.

If I have your meaning correctly, all leaders in Argentina are therefore "shameless fools", and you, comfortable in your armchair must be the "wise man" who will save the world.
(Edited)
This was predicted as it was predictable.

You want something done properly give it to competent people who aren’t looking for a fight with half the population.

Btw: This is where the US is heading
(Edited)
Can you think of any major country, other than totalitarian China and the Russian dictatorship, which isn't in a fight with half its population?

I didn't think so.
(Edited)
You ain’t too Zen 😄😉

Answer to your less than cool remark- Off course in the politics of most western countries there are disagreements but the leaders do not go out of their way to make the other half of the population into the enemies.

Btw: as nicely written by Orwell, it is precisely in the totalitarian countries that those hatreds are magnified in the usual rituals of the 2 minute hate.Enjoy the schooling
(Edited)
Waffle. You didn't answer the question, and you cover up your lack of knowledge with a personalized smear.

You need to get out a little, and at least brush up on politics in places like Great Britain. Then you might know something.
Easy give me some stats otherwise take a hike-Btw; Appreciate English isn’t your first language - but do try to get Chat GPT to do a better job - comrade 😉
Milei is a monkey
Said like a five year old.
Loving the Mileite cope. Keep pushing neoliberalism! It will definitely work and won't create the circumstances for a proletarian revolution. Your ideas are good and just and you should never question them even for a second (lest you develop consciousness).
Maybe Elon could throw in a couple of bucks and a brand new chainsaw. He was so enamoured with Milei a few months back.
US should standby Argentina, so the leftist Peronist don’t come to power. More of a disaster if that monster gets resurrected.
Milei has rejected alliances with non-Peronists, the only way to contain Peronism if he keeps failing at reviving the economy.
Argentina, needs to be bailed out yet once again! Six months ago it was IMF money. This time it is U.S. taxpayers money. Would this be the last one?
The peso should be allowed to float, and U.S. taxpayers’ money should NOT BE USED TO BUY PESOS (finance capital flight), but rather be deposited in an escrow account and used SOLELY to supporting the government’s efforts to access private capital markets and roll over its dollar-denominated debt
Argentina only needs help to roll over new debt. Milei hasn’t take a single new dollar of debt, on the contrary, he is paying back. And he runs a balanced budget. The problem is that markets are closed to new issues to rollover, they need a bridge until the markets open up. No country in the world can pay off its debt. They just rollover and growing GDP faster, they get rid of debt in relative terms. Not the case on the US and Europe, they have overspend Argentina style, the difference is that they issue in their own currency, so they can devaluate the currency a little every year and wipe out the debt slowly.
Milei didnt look at the wider picture. He didnt need too pay off debt. He needed to build reserves. He needed to keep the peso competitive. He needed to boost exports.

There was never going to be a magic wand. He fooled himself and argentinians into believing that it could all be over in less than 24 months. The truth is that he could stabilise in that time but needed far longer to get solid growth feeding into living standards.
Easier to say that to do. Argentina is a very complex case. In an ideal world, your comment makes total sense. In the real world that Argentina had to operate, this option was not available.
When you are coming from a 20p% inflation or a hyperinflation spiral, the priority is to stop it. Cutting the budget deficit was a must. That meant to cut 15 points of the GDP. No country in the world ever did that during peace time. The consequence would be a brutal recession. Well, it didn’t happen. Long to explain why, but in few words, he avoided a deadly economic depression, but he still had to keep the economy repressed to cut the inflation spiral. This includes making the peso a little too strong. It is impossible to buy reserves or have a competitive exchange rate in that scenario. You can achieve one objective at the expense of the other. He chose what we know and I agree with him. It required a lot of guts to do that. He gamble and won. He had a white knight and they knew it: Donald Trump and Scott Bessent. Friends are friends.
time for argentine to join the eurozone
The problem with libertarianism is pretty soon you need to be bailed out with somebody else’s money. Billionaires are quite happy to prop up Milei, because they wish to maintain appearances. They are going to be used the US to do it for them
Argentina's problem is not libertarianism, it is the populist socialism which preceeded Milei for decades under the Peronists.
He is (imperfectly) dealing with an almost impossible situation with zero sum trade offs to be made between short term pain and long term revival.
It was and still is the irresponsible left who always choose to avoid short term pain by sacrificing the future of their own country.
When will the IMF ever learn? Lending (giving) money to Argentina is pouring it down the drain. Now the US has joined the game.
It’s the libertarian billionaires who control the government that need to prop up their ideology that has failed.
The peso should be allowed to float, and U.S. taxpayers’ money should NOT BE USED TO BUY PESOS (finance capital flight), but rather be deposited in an escrow account and used SOLELY to supporting the government’s efforts to access private capital markets and roll over its dollar-denominated debt
Hector! once is enough
I understand that libertarianism exists primarily to provide a fig leaf of intellectual justification for the worst imaginable human behavior, but surely accepting a massive government bailout (from a foreign government) is too much cognitive dissonance for even the most cynical?
The terms "intellectual" and "libertarian" are mutually exclusive. If you tried to plot them as a Venn Diagram you would be left with a graphic of two independent ellipses.
So where are all the Milei's the guy crowd? The ones that asserted he's the strong leader that going to take the necessary steps to right the ship?

And who by the way owns all the dollar denominated Argentine debt? Its Trump billionaire buddies I'll bet
How much do you want to bet? I'm game.
Bet on what exactly?
Today Trump scolded everyone for failing to be more like him, than bails this guy out to show how successful Trump economic model is.
Monetarism has always been ideological nonsense. How many times does it need to fail to produce stable results before you move on?
The US will bail him out, he's ideologically aligned with Trump.
Even though Milei will likely lose in the upcoming election, it may be that Trump will still bail the country out. Why? Because many of his billionaire buddies are the holders of that dollar denominated debt.

Thanks to Danny from "All Things Financial" for pointing this out
(Edited)
Von Mises and Hayek state clearly, unambiguously that if and when markets send you price signals that you find distasteful, you must right away ask daddy to bail you out.
The 'spontaneous order' becomes the 'spontaneous bailout.'

Excellent article and well written.
*** snicker ***

Those _ss clowns.
That made me laugh, so thank you!

Top drawer comedy.
‘We’re on our road to nowhere ‘
Sooner or later everyone turns to Trump .
I cry for you Argentina, if someone like Milei is not capable of fixing things, the outlook does not look great. Perhaps the US instinct to support Milei through this crisis is the right one, provided that there are strings attached to refinancing.
It was always destined to fail. No one should have been surprised - how many times do we have to run the experiment. Pity the >50% of the population thrown in to poverty at the whims of international finance.
The whims of international finance? What about the ineptitude of Peronist politics!
Macri didn’t do any better.
We are talking about Milei
The only ones who have a reason and right to complain are the MAGA folks who certainly didn't vote for this. The bleeding heart leftists that crowd this comment section are so agenda driven and totally clueless about Argentina that white noise at 100 dB is a preferable source of information.
MAGA didn't vote for this? Really?
So true .
Aww! Another failed ideological experiment is upsetting you?

Poor dear
Libertarians are the biggest intellectual frauds you'll ever encounter.

A three dollar bill is more authentic than these self congratulatory hucksters.
That you Paul Krugman?
At least Paul Krugman is a real economist. Can't say the same for Thomas Sowell.
Is he hell. He is the PhD of Keynesian nonsense and a master of failure. A total joker.
He knows how to fit and calibrate an optimizer to derive inference through empirical methods.

You RWNJs (Sowell as a prime example) substitute objectiveness with your feelings and emotions. Your so-called economists are opinion columnists.
Oh gawd - we got ourselves a real econ snob.
FEEEELINGS!!!!
And hello to you, Mr Know-Nothing.
(Edited)
Well, as much as I have a marginal respect for Krugman, especially since he left the New York Times , I don’t hold out much hope for mainstream economists. Their skills in statistics are pathetic. You have to look to the life sciences to the medical industry and science to see actual analytical skill.

Economists even talk about the Granger test as a casual test rather than a predictive test. The two are not the same
Everyone is a libertarian neoliberal until they need help .
Therein lies my core gripe about libertarianism.
Yes!!
Anyone else find it vaguely humorous that Bessent is dangling a bailout, as if the US is some beacon of economic stability?

"Do as we say, not as we do"
The debt is simply moving up the chain
Why is the article not focusing more on the practical effect of his policies. Because that’s what is causing the election losses, that are causing the markets to wobble
Because the article is about how the US is intervening to support them. There are other articles that do what you ask for. Not every article has to talk about everything all at once.
so, the why, the cause that prompts a political and ideological ally of a country like Argentina to intervene isn’t important to an article about why said country is intervening. We have different views of what important is.
Dance Milei
Glad we are able to help out. Kicking the debt crisis can down the road is always a good idea.
Good luck to Argentina.

Whatever happens, it should be with the will of the people and not pushed through the throat of the people neither by radicals from the right or the left or anybody.

The entire country will have to make sacrifices to pull the country out of the situation it finds itself in and hopefully Argentinians find a consensus on how to do that.

It is a great country and Argentinians of all walks of life deserve better and actually have the potential, skills and intellect to pull themselves out of the situation they are in.

Best wishes to Argentina and all Argentinians.
Good thoughts….thank you.
Surprise surprise. Running a country based on a toddler's temper tantrum and what do you expect? That the invisible hand of the market would magically find a job that the invisible chainsaw laid off?Stop trying to commodify human suffering into a neat little graph for investors. Eventually you'll see your backside.
Argentina was once the fourth richest in the world. The 70 years of Peronism destroyed it. Milei is doing what worked for Thatchers miracle in the UK.If you cannot see that this is a break from Keynesian/Socialist/Peronist suicide, then you are either a fool or don’t know Argentinian history.
Failure to industrialise and over-reliance on agri exports destroyed it. And poor political leadership.
Wasn't Peronism a reaction to something................................?
Yes. Sensibility
Brilliant comment
USAid? What happened to DOGE?
Another bailout soon
Saving Argentina from a century of Peronistas is tough.
Maybe Congress should save themselves...The US is getting in a huge debt hole.
go back to sleep
Wait till they have to bail out Reform UK!
nothing that more US gringo intervention, sanctions, gunboat diplomacy UnitedFruit staged coups and the CIA cannot fix surely?
Why are US taxpayer dollars being spent to support a foreign politician? Maybe Fox News could look into this huge betrayal of hard working, middle class taxpayers?
Absolutely! What about America First, or is it MAGA First?
Monroe Doctrine
Scott Bessent an unlikely contender for Maga spokesman /representative
(Edited)
And Reform and the Conservatives say we should introduce Milei’s quack policies here - laughable.
Here we have a warning of what will happen if Reform-a-Tory ever become the government of Britain.
The only UK government that ever went cap in hand to the IMF for a bail out was a Labour one.
…because the Treasury civil servants messed up and overestimated the size of the national debt.
And that was in 1976.
Rewrite history if you want. Labour have a track record of wrecking sound economic inheritances, except this time the Johnson government got there first with the wrecking ball. Currently Rachel and Keir are 'fixing the foundations'. How's that going?
(Edited)
Sound inheritance!
The Tories left the country in an epic mess in both 1974 and 2024. As per usual, Labour are having to clear up after the right wing incompetents.
And I have done no rewriting of history. You just don’t know anything about the 1976 IMF bailout, other than it happened and Labour were government at the time. Feel free to do some reading on the subject.
another boring American ideologue who conflates welfare state with socialism=communism= suppression of freedom/market.
For an example of true dysfunctionality take a peek at the usa today.
The quack policies are being run by Labour. Its a freak show.
What a load of misrepresentative garbage by the FT, ascribing a fully political crisis to rather solid economic policy. In part because of missteps by Milei, Peronist Congress has been trying to nuke Milei’s fiscal surplus since June and to remove his ability to pass decrees going forward, reducing governance. All in an attempt to fuel a run on the currency, and thus inflation before elections, so as to usher in poor results for Milei.

All this noise set off a 20% depreciation that was tempered by very high real rates. Markets had already fallen substantially by the time the Buenos Aires election shock loss to the most left-wing of Kirchnerist rivals (Axel Kiciloff, expropriator of YPF) precipitated the final panic. Errors here were mostly political, in alliance building, cited as secondary in this article. And a few reserves more or less will not make a difference if the incoming government is Kirchnerist and can effect controls over the fiscal surplus (and further down the line in 2027, the central bank and any remaining reserves). The market aggressively discounts that TODAY.

Both Macri and Massa have seen tens of billions of reserves burned in months, there’s nothing on the economic front that could’ve made Argentina not have to choose between A) big reserve losses before elections due to political panic or B) a blow out in a floating FX before elections due to political panic (which is what the opposition is looking to obtain). This is a political issue and must be solved via that channel. This congressional and economic terrorism is an institutional coup of sorts and it’s had unfortunate success, hence the lifeline from Trump which is trying to keep the country (and its resources) from going the way of Peronists and thus China.

The FX will fully float after the elections, not before as the opposition desires.
I agree that Peronistanomics is unsustainable and has been for decades.

Your comment is a favourite of the fringe, whether left or right: I would have succeeded if faceless, powerful vested interests hadn't thwarted my plans. Are you Liz Truss in disguise?
Read better. My comment is centered on this being primarily a political crisis, not an economic one in origin. The FT leads readers to believe otherwise.
Didn’t the economic crisis create the political one?
No, there was no economic crisis by the time the Peronists began this push in Congress in June. By any means and definitely not by Argentine standards. Not in terms of employment, not in terms of real or dollar wages, not in terms of inflation, not in terms of poverty levels. There were some sectors hard hit, yes, and the rebound had begun to slow. But this was fully political, which has since accelerated economic slowdown via the high real rates needed to combat a run on the dollar.
You can’t keep you Milei favoritism aside and be an objective opinion.
I am not a Libertarian, but I recognize when any political party wishes to retain power by causing intentional harm to the population via economic and social terrorism. Milei's biggest mistake was exposing his political flanks. He can still recover, if he changes politically.
Oh absolutely! It couldn't possibly be the "chainsaw economics" that caused economic collapse. Such a shame when pure, unadulterated ideology meets the harsh reality of, you know, people needing to eat!
Argentina's economy had already collapsed when Milei took over. He put the patient on CPR which lasted 20 months before the country fell into circulatory failure once again.
No president in modern times have inherited a worse economy and although Milei has made some mistakes, Karina Milei being the biggest, pinning the current problems on his "chainsaw economics" alone is just ignorance.
In January 2024, Argentina's poverty rate reached 57.4%, the highest poverty rate in the country since 2004.
The rate has now gone back down closer to the low-end of the recent history of Argentina.

While I agree his policies weren’t the only cause of the current problems (obviously not!) I am confused why people keep defending Milei. He has been largely incompetent as a politician and not really coherent in reforming/fixing the economy. Even if you believe in right wing economic policies it seems he will fail to deliver anything of value.
(Edited)
We had the choice between sleepwalking towards becoming Venezuela 2.0 or try a wild card named Javier Gerardo Milei. President Milei can still turn this around but he better do it without Caputo and Karina M. who've been terrible decisions of his.
I get that, and maybe it was right maybe it was wrong. Who the hell knows, but now that the choice is made why not try to look at his performance objectively rather than eternally imagining how much worse the other side would be.

Honestly even on inflation if we take the total price level increase under Milei I am not even sure he does better than the Peronists would’ve done over the same period.
the poverty rate is at 31% to be precise, and yes, that is incredible, over 12 million people lifted out of poverty, 6 million out of indigence. Unlike press noise, domestic political noise, association bias and the like, current government actually drastically increased social spending in real terms since milei took office. Reducing inflation in a country that was on the edge of venuzuela-like hyperinflation has been the SINGLE best SOCIAL policy one can take,, and miracoulously, inflation indeed went from 25% monthly to under 2% monthly today & fiscal surplus.
Reducing inflation in a country that was on the edge of venuzuela-like hyperinflation has been the SINGLE best SOCIAL policy one can take
In the first year he ran up inflation from 120% or so to over 200%, his total price level increase over 2 years is probably worse than the last 2 years of Peronist (this is just a number, so no need for hysteria)

And Milei’s inflation number will skyrocket once the currency crashes, so unless the Americans bail him out again (after the IMF bailout Milei got like his Peronist predecessors) you are still on your way to hyperinflation.
No, that is incorrect. Inflation in 2023 was 211.4%, in 2024 it was 117.8%. He took office December 10th in 2023, the very moment wholesale inflation was travelling at over 1% a day. In december 2023 inflation was 25%, wholesale at 54%. Today, inflation is under 2% monthly.
(Edited)

So we might end up discussing how much he was to blame for the december number, but in November (so before he was in power the inflation CPI was) 161%
Then we have December, with 211%, then it runs up to 292% in April 2024.

You have proven absolutely nothing by comparing the current inflation rate, instead of the overall price level increases.

If I cause prices to skyrocket by 10.000% and the following month I reduce it to 0% I have still done terrible job on price levels overall.
His economics knowledge is zero, just a camp follower of the Chicago School which thinks financial engineering solves economic problems.
If things were so easy!
What uninformed, idiotic BS.
According to you one would think nobody voted for those evil forces in congress who oppose the decrees or present their own bills.
The marginal votes that helped Peronism were in fact historically anti-Kirchnerists votes (PRO and others), and some were breakaways from Milei's own party. So no, people did not vote for them to turn on their original platforms. We'll see in October if they now do.
(Edited)
“… Congress has been trying to … remove his ability to pass decrees going forward, reducing governance” …

This skates over the problem of political legitimacy and democratic accountability which Milei created by trying to ram his entire policy programme through by decree, effectively overriding the Parliament. Parliament had enough, especially when the decrees were bringing yet more distress for vulnerable sections of the population.

The idea that because l was elected l should have total executive power to do whatever l like is essentially dictatorial, and dictatorships are doomed to fail in the end.
(Edited)
Ah, so when Kirchners/Peronist's changed the law to actually allow such decree governance for 16 years in the first place, it was all good. But when a minority government that they oppose comes in, despite facing an economic emergency...well...time to change the law back to neuter such decree powers. Of course, excellent analysis!
No wonder Liz Truss is such a fan of his. Same chaos.
Kiwis and bananas.
Argentinians don’t like reforms and go back to their old ways? Colour me shocked.
who'd have thunk it, eh!
(Edited)
Also pointing out that global prices did about 75% of the work in pulling down the inflation peak after they settled back down again after the Ukraine and shipping market shocks. Argentina did need to manage inflation MORE than many other countries, but not AS much as Milei thought he did.

Which potentially means not only might've Milei overdone the austerity when markets could've managed some of the inflationary reduction on its own, he took so much money out the system he effectively choked it.

This is the problem when you let ideology override your actual physical market analysis. Policy without context is silly, basically.
(Edited)
The mistake was not overdoing “austerity”, but overvaluing the exchange rate.

Setting the exchange rate at a realistic level encourages net exports but increases inflation. More control of domestic spending is needed.
I would suggest the problem is more of a few extra extracting as much inflation from the population as they can manage.

Over and over again, we see that inflation is driven by the largest actors in an economy. Price rises from those who can austerity from those who cannot. Something like stagflation is no mystery
I mean inflation is still at 34% so I’d say they probably have a ways to go here.
Running around with a chainsaw did not auger well. Seems TACO will be doing some serious asset stripping. Maybe he'll even take part ownership of the country. Rule nothing out.
"economic mis-steps"
Which ones exactly?
Milei’s self-proclaimed economic miracle
"self-proclaimed" is a carefully chosen adjective when his policies have been recognized worldwide... projected to grow fastest in the world in 2025 after India this year according to the IMF, with the same policies leading to a decrease of 12 million people out of poverty (validated by independent evaluators) over the course of 18 months?

peso’s value artificially strong

Might be helpful to add that the peso has never been this free in Argentina's recent history. Besides, circulating money is at ~5% , a historical low (normally around 9-10%); there is no concern at all in defending the upper band for a temporary lack of liquidity , policies that have been agreed upon with IMF too.. note theres more hard foreign reserves than circulating money..

which hurt economic growth

With 6.3% annualized gdp growth at the moment, after a severe (needed) fiscal adjustment , quite demanding standards to conclude how much the economy is hurting (obviously you cannot compare to some ideal state of argentina, you should look at how it has been left behind.)

Overall, monetary policy is more stable than it has ever been- no more peso emission for over a year, enough reserves going forward, fiscal and primary surplus, commercial surplus, and upcoming elections for congress so that very promising reforms are likely to pass through
In terms of debt, it suffices to say that consolidated debt has been reduced by 54bn usd since he took office; everything is very much under control even if it doesn't look like it on the surface - but positive elections in october would be important to get reforms through..
(Edited)
Debt being under control doesn't mean much, at all, if the wider system is in meltdown and needs bailing out. If anything the lack of own funds means that if anything goes slightly off kilter (as it WILL, because global politics is always unstable as BAU, not stable as BAU) there is nothing left in the kitty to manage it and you need to call for outside help.

And oh look!

That's exactly what happened!
Nice pivot from ‘domestic meltdown’ to ‘global instability.’ In 2023 Argentina had –$10bn reserves, 200%+ inflation, 6% deficit — that was meltdown. In Sept 2025 it has ~$40bn reserves, 1.6% surplus, 6.3% growth — the exact buffers you need BECAUSE the world is unstable.
Wow you absolutely destroyed that persons argument. They can’t even respond.
Chainsaw economics which drove tens of thousands into poverty and you call this a success? Stop commodify human suffering for the benefit of your investment portfolio.
You clearly know nothing about Argentina. Waste of space.
You clearly know nothing about human suffering.
Inform yourself. Poverty peaked at over 57% in january 2024, and is now around 31% only 20 months later. Social spending only increased in real terms since Milei took office. For a country at the edge of hyperinflation, the single best SOCIAL policy is reducing it, and this mainly happens through fiscal discipline aka CHAINSAW in the prior Argentinian hyper deficitarian context.
We are now Making Argentina Great Again.

The taxpayer money used to prop up populists worldwide . What could go wrong ?

The irony is that America is following Argentina’s economic and political trajectory from 80 years ago.

Who will be bailing us out in 2100?
Well its Argentina, what can one expect
Just apply to be another state of the USA. might as well be another peurto Rico
PR not the only state in US that receives more from the fed gov than it sends in taxes.
Didnt realise MAGA stood for Make Argentina Great Again.
MAGA needs allies. Doesn’t have too many lately does it?
Make Anglesey Great Again? Druidic separatists.
Here we go again Argentina… get ready for #10.
Why is anyone surprised by this result from a populist practising voodoo economics?
Hayekians are having an existential crisis as this should Not Have Happened. And yet, it did. Because how was it not going to when you mistake a mathematical model used as a baseline to analyse economic exchanges in social systems, for a religious doctrine.
No crisis for Hayekians.

Problem is a political decision to overvalue the exchange rate, which they would not support.
Didnt Hayek back Pinochet?
Don’t know.
But Pinochet certainly did wonders for Chile’s economy, unlike left wing dictators in Latin America.
(Edited)
IAllende was worth 1 thousand Pinochets.

Pinochet appeals to those who like murder, torture and selling off public good to your own family.

The wonder is that people like you still support him
Interesting article but a bit jumbled up. It says that to keep the peso strong was “a big error” and then that the depreciation of the peso has been a big problem. What were you looking for?
Simple.
People take on obligations assuming the peso is going to be strong (e.g., take on dollar debt), and those positions become unsustainable when the peso falls.
Keeping it strong is a big economic error, but politically useful.

Depreciation is a political problem.
The peso can either be strong or weak - the chaps are arguing that both are problematic.
They are both problematic, but for different reasons.

That is the core of Argentina’s problem.
Although I respect the FT's reporting, many of its articles have celebrated Milei's policies. One editorial calls him the "libertarian economist" and some of his decisions ideological, but still gushes about the potential of his policies: https://www.ft.com/content/8af38ca8-474f-47a8-b1e2-1040e7002d71.

To those of us who've been researching economic policy in Latin America, this outcome is not exactly surprising. It doesn't look good to celebrate a far right president, even when you have to admit that he's not the economic genius that you thought he was going to be.
What exactly doesn't look good about reducing monthly inflation from 25% to under 2% and getting poverty from a 57% peak in january 2024 to under 31% today? Or is it having a fiscal surplus as one in only 5 countries in the world? Or Is it the fact that real salaries and real pensions have increased since he assumed?
No one in Argentina is feeling the love… especially the lower and middle classes. Eliminating poverty is something Milei likes to parade but everyday people are not feeling the economic benefit and they have struggled financially but accepted his policies for a future greater good which they are not seeing. This combined with less money for pensioners and disabled is a mix for disaster.
The lower classes are those who benefited the most... Social spending increased in real terms from the very beginning (through increases in AUH and plan Alimentar), and thanks to complete aid reforms they were able to take out corrupt intermediaries that used to take away half of resources meant for the beneficiaries. This, in addition to drastically reducing inflation (which unironically hurted the poorest people the most...), ensured 12 million people got out of poverty, and 6 million out of indigence. Middle class salaries went up in real terms over 10%, and pensions did as well. This Is also true for people with disabilities - opposition in congress just tries to find noble causes to destabilize fiscal stability, which is why you may have been misled. I'm just basing it off empirical data, not on some heavenly insights of "not feeling the love". Most social indicators objectively show Argentina is in a far better place than it used to be, thanks to the new government reforms... Don't forget you can't build Rome in a day, and that in 2023 Argentina was on the edge of hyperinflation and that could have meant poverty numbers skyrocketing to 80-90%, a la Venuzuela.
A reduction of inflation is of course a good thing but it's far from easy to achieve that in a sustainable way, as Milei is also finding out. Brazil's Real Plan in 1994 is the exception rather than the rule, which was introduced after years of failed attempts at containing inflation through shock therapy. In Argentina, the late 1970s also saw a reduction in inflation, under authoritarian rule, and that didn't end well, not just for Videla and his colleagues. It's never as simple as switching on your chainsaw and thinking that will solve everything.
Sure, but this is always the result of monetary emissions to cover fiscal deficits. for the first time in history, Argentina is sustainably in fiscal surplus AND monetary emission has been stopped since mid 2024 - never again will a peso be emitted.
Why does Argentina have taxes on its exports?

That sounds bonkers.
(Edited)
It (in theory) keeps local prices down. Similar to the way the US used to restrict petroleum exports.
I mean... did anyone not see this coming?
70% of the FT's commentators?
LEt Trump support Argentina and Israel financially, they are the last friends he has, the American tax payer will get thrown in jail if they object.
I read these articles and ponder the reluctance of the UK to seriously reform now while it is relatively easy if not always popular with key voters constituencies.
Argentina is where one ends up after decades of living beyond your means.
if not always popular with key voters constituencies
and this is the problem. We have recently had the mad situation where Labour (!) wanted to reduce benefit spending by a modest cut in Winter Cruise Payments and reform of the PIP system, and the Tories, who ought to be the ones backing benefit reform, just seeing extremely narrow political opportunity.
Maybe the threat posed by Reform, who will bloat the benefit bill through the pensions black hole, will force Labour, LD and the sane end of the Tory party to actually talk to each other for once.
Winter Cruise Payments>>> someone has been reading (or writing ) too much Sun/Daily Mail propaganda
Uneducated take. The economy is not your household budget.
(Edited)
Are markets designed to save? It is the government and other public institutions that save markets and organisations that the markets destroy.
It's Macri all over again, with the same Minister of Finance and the same bets that never pan out - international investment flooding the country, yeah right....So, more debt again...rinse and repeat.
There is an unmentioned force in the article: Peronism.
Beyond the monumental challenge of bringing Argentina back from the precipice, Milei must also contend with a political movement that is the biggest representative in congress to pass/stop laws and consistently thrived on patronage and obstruction.

Rather than contributing to solutions, many within Peronism seem intent on ensuring failure so they can return to power. Peronism is as much a threat to stability as the economic crisis itself.
Millei must also contend with the fact his economic theories are garbage
Milei doesn't have to contend with it, sadly , especially if the US are going to bail him out. Just the Argentinian people.
There is an unmentioned force in the article: Peronism.
Beyond the monumental challenge of bringing Argentina back from the precipice, Milei must also contend with a political movement that is the biggest representative in congress to pass/stop laws and consistently thrived on patronage and obstruction.

Rather than contributing to solutions, many within Peronism seem intent on ensuring failure so they can return to power. Peronism is as much a threat to stability as the economic crisis itself.
People, the crisis is not due to his policies but the unfortunate election result that has markets worried. This is an endorsement of his policies; the market is worried the terrible previous government will come back to power.

Blows my mind so many people are missing the obvious here and choosing to see what they want to see.
Those pesky voters, eh? I’m sure democracy will be in the bin soon enough. Maybe the bond market will respond more favourably to autocracies … wait what happened to Russia after sanctions again?
My goodness, who could have predicted this? 🤡
The masses voting for shortsighted gains at the expense of the long-term big picture gains is not surprising. Still a little surprising that they are completely ignoring the dramatic turnaround that his policies have yielded and are willing to go back to the old failed policies of the last government. This "crisis" is one of market confidence in the people of Argentina and actually highlights his success...it is the threat of abandoning his reforms that is causing problems, not his policies.
Reach
Partly true. They should have let the peso depreciate at the start but this would have meant a slower disinflation path. There is no easy trade-offs for Argentina.
The cure worked but the patient died
Wonder why IMF lent them the money in the first place. It does not look like much of a plan.
Like all US Presidents like golf - I’d like to see the stats on the amount of days Milei spends out of Argentina.

He shout probably limit his operatic stirring of tea leaves in Davos, Madrid, california and Washington.

It’s amusing how he is being brought down by his sister- had chosen as Chief of Staff.

As the Chinese say: “don’t leave mama on the till”.

A deeply corrupt train wreck in perpetuity - The Republic of Argentina.
Isnt an over strong peso what brought down the last attempt at defeating inflation?
Yes, and unfortunately with the same economy minister, Mr Caputo, in charge. I guess the old saying "Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results" applies here..
Living in Argentina for the last 18 months has been a kin to being inside a runaway train that suddenly got its brakes to function. As one can imagine, it hasn't been a pleasant ride for the passengers.
However, the new conductor didn't let up when the train's velocity became manageable but kept the brakes on full bore, thus stopping the train -- which has generated a new set of problems.
How’s it living there, the lifestyle, wages, jobs etc
The problem with neoliberalism is that you need a lot of other people’s money” - Not Margaret Thatcher

(See Reagan and his deficits, Liz Truss and her abortive budget, and now Milei and his rented chainsaw).
Indeed. Libertarian economics is a scam with a terrible track record. It is rarely mentioned that Friedman was bankrolled by Big Oil to provide "science" in line with their political goals of tax evasion and environmental deregulation. Also, the fans of Reagan and Thatcher always fail to mention that there economic "genius" coincided with a splurge from fossil fuels. Compare how Norway spent their gas windfalls to how the UK did - hint, one has a sovereign wealth fund...
More speaking from the Politburo script issued to free subscriber FT college students.

Norway is a relatively small oil and gas field with an even smaller country attached. It has a similar population to Ireland. So the oil and gas surplus per head is large, i.e. can be sat aside in a Sov Fund.

Conversely, Great Britain is a medium sized country (was during the Reagan/Thatcher era 13 times the size of Norway or Ireland), with a relatively small oil and gas field attached.
So it was good not to create a wealth fund because our oil and gas were relatively small?

Is there such a politburo script issued to FT college free subscribers? Are there wokes and reds under your bed too?
(Edited)
Oil and gas prices are volatile.
North Sea oil first flowed ashore in Britain in 1975.

A large chunk of the then highly priced bounty went into repaying the development of the North Sea and piping processed gas to homes and businesses all over the UK (which required a very large infrastructure investment).

In 1986, the oil price collapsed and stayed low and after a brief rebound during the Gulf War in 1991, it collapsed again in the mid 90's, before reaching (briefly) new heights in around 2010, before collapsing again in 2014, before a brief rise again during the Russian invasion of Ukraine and now it is collapsing again, with Saudi Arabia pumping more oil to seize market share off the U.S. frackers.

The actual abundance of oil and the extraordinary technological advancements in deepwater offshore and onshore drilling (fracking) made oil cheap most of the time.

The wealth of Norway arises from the large benefit a small population drew off relatively small oil fields. The U.K. 12-13 times larger in population terms than Norway, so it's benefits are spread over a far greater number of people.

As usual, the Politburo script lines cannot teach their young socialist "useless idiots" (as Stalin termed such) to count or to research historical oil price records / examine implications of differing population sizes.
There again with the politburo line. Who outside of maybe some sheep in the Inishkea island can take you seriously?

I don’t know what bureau supplies your script lines but they definitely have not taught you to read and answer questions.
Ad hominem, how quaint.

The fact that the Koch brothers financed Milton Friedman, James McGill Buchanan and a few other conservative economists is well established.

Buchanan held that psychopathy was both natural and the highest human virtue, that we all seek to mastery in a world of slaves.

Everything about the conservative establishment nurtures dark triad personality. These traits are destructive to society.
Don't forget selling of state owned industries for buttons and the "bribe" of council houses for sale. The continued effects of both continue to blight the UK to this day.

It's easy to look like your policies are working if you are selling the family silver at the back door. The last 15 years of Conservative government showed us what happens when you run out of family silver.
Except, Milei is not running a deficit. Argentina has been running on a fiscal surplus ever since Milei took office - the very reason chainsaw was necessary given the inherited 15% twin deficit. It only borrowed money to replace (inherited) internal debt, or rolling over debt to be able to cover interest payments... monetary emissions halted since mid-2024, which mainly explains drastic reduction in inflation. (Unironically, the latter is mainly responsible for reducing poverty rates from a peak above 57% in Jan24' to under 31% today.)
Suddenly the right are in favour of handouts to deadbeat welfare claimants.
US billionaires, and Bessent, are free to bail out Argentina with their personal funds. There is need to involve hardworking people who pay taxes in this particular boondoggle
I knew the guy was a clown when I read that his sister and their dogs are part of government.
Regarding the dogs, I knew about them before he was even elected.
Without being personal his own appearance like that of Musk does not generate expectations of maturity, stability and indeed coherence.
And here I thought a clown with a chainsaw will finally be able to crack the basic arithmetic problem of exponential growth inherent to compound interest.
Argentina is not redeemable. There is so much one leader can do, in terms of what it would take the voters are simply not there.
I wonder what Trump will ask for in return? A golden statue in BA?
Alan Faena
The complete destruction and sale of all remaining natural resources.
What will kill Milei is his hubris and personal narcissism. He is totally unable to show any respect for his allies and to give them any credit. His number of MPs is pitiful.
It is a pity because he was doing "some" good things. But Argentinians have concluded he is a deeply unpleasant man with very little humanity. Even if you have to administer bitter medicines, a bit of compassion for those you make destitute goes a long way. His stuborness about devaluing the peso or letting it float to find its true value is puzzling.
Interesting comment, thanks.
Could not agree more. Reducing government expenditure is absolutelly esential, and you need friends and foes alike to move the ship forward. Many people lent him a hand, which was always bitten. There were stories about former president Macri going to see him, and Milei could not be bothered to stop watching TV to receive his guest. And this was an ally who put all the chips on the table for Milei without expecting anything in return.
The true value of the peso is much, much lower, that’s a big part of the problem
This is very true. A taxi driver in Bariloche told me last week that most Argentinians understand that Milei has to do hard things and even that they won’t always work, but they’ve lost patience with the rough, poorly targeted and compassionless way it’s being done.
Feels a bit like Trump ...
With the exception that Trump has done zero good things.
Even to the maga cult, his style is jarring when their lives continue to get more expensive. You can only handle so much until you start seeing that owning the libs isn’t worth you getting economically steamrolled.
(Edited)
So how has Milei’s self-proclaimed economic miracle come so close to unravelling?
This is tabloid language. There was no "miracle" and there is no "unravelling". There was a toxic legacy consisting of an absence of a functioning currency, high inflation, a total lack of trust in Argentina's monetary institutions, and no credit. No comparable economy had such a toxic state of affairs, not even close, and Argentina fwiw is a G20 economy. There are no easy options out of such a mess and the path implemented had risks, as other options (total free float) would have had. The biggest risk is obviously political and this is being priced into Argentine assets. People have not forgotten what happened in August 2019.
That shock came on 7 September, when Milei’s libertarians suffered an unexpected landslide defeat at local elections in Buenos Aires province
Needs to be qualified. Milei did not lose voters to the Peronists. Turnout fell by 15% compared to 2023, almost all explained by Milei's block. He has a serious turnout issue, a large part of the non-Peronist voter base could not be bothered to vote for him.
unless a new political coalition is formed that will support Argentina’s economic programme,”
This is crucial. There needs to be a consensus after the upcoming midterms of all political forces (ex Peronism) that Milei's economic programme will be supported and that real reforms (tax code, labor market, trade etc) will be implemented. Milei can remain verbally aggressive relative to the Peronists, but needs to be much more accommodating to the rest. Nobody likes being insulted.

There are some macro factors that were a burden on Macri but should help Milei in the medium term. The current account is in surplus and the energy deficit has been reversed.

Reforming Argentina remains a generational task. You cannot assess progress after a mere 18 months.
(Edited)
Reforming Argentina remains a generational task. You cannot assess progress after a mere 18 months.
Unfortunately that is not how democracy works. Milei has to take the country with him if he is to succeed. He appears to be at war with it.
Unfortunately that is not how democracy works.
Milei has to take the country with him if he is to succeed. He appears to be at war with it.
The problem for oligarchy is that people never knowingly vote for it. Which leaves force as the only available option to achieve it. Ref the USA.
(Edited)
"Needs to be qualified.". Disagree. The survey analysis post-election does show that significant numbers of people who voted for Milei's party in previous elections did vote for the opposition in the Province of Buenos Aires election. It was not a case of people not turning up, but people changing their vote. And in this case you are talking about almost 40 percent of Argentina's votes. If you add Córdoba and Santa Fe, you get over 50%. I think this is why Milei went to Córdoba last week as it is a key province.

Regarding the current account figures, it is in deficit now

You cannot assess progress after a mere 18 months

It's only been 18 months, as you say, so it's not even been two years in and he's already going cap in hand for his second bailout. I don't think it bodes well for the next 18 months in that case, as the article points out
It’s approaching 21.5 months. Just as the rocket was about to clear orbit, seems like his problems have been caused by nepotism- his sister Karina - hand picked as CoS - caught up in corruption.

I’ve read that sort of story before… a gal called Cristina
When dealing with financial crisis, shock therapy is often necessary at first but to execute the long climb out of the hole what you also need is sober realism and ability to keep the crew together. Milei is coming up short on the latter qualities. Let's hope he can still dredge them up from somewhere.
Absolutely right. When you start dredging asyou say, sludge is the first thing that comes out.
Millions of peronistas voted for Milei, his administration is full of them. Argentina can't be governed without some accommodation with the identity that binds many, perhaps most Argentines together
Needs to be qualified. Milei did not lose voters to the Peronists. Turnout fell by 15% compared to 2023, almost all explained by Milei's block. He has a serious turnout issue
No. No it doesn't. You don't understand how elections work. It's typically unheard of that voters switch to the opposing party. Elections are won and lost by one side not turning up.
It slowly dawns on the FT that Milei is a lunatic, his top economy team are ex-trader wideboys and that he and the sister deliberately spat in the face of every party and politician outside his inner circle that might help him. Oh and peronismo is neither left wing nor right wing, it's peronismo, the second line and all the way down of Milei's administration is full of peronistas
Peronism is left wing all the way, the "not muh reeeel socialism!" line doesn't fool anyone anymore.
there are indeed peronista socialists, as there are peronista fascists, social democrats, liberals and anything else you can think of. peronismo is a second layer of national identity compatible with all ideologies and none
Menem was a Peronista. Difficult to describe him as a lefty of any sort
Peron saved Franco regime around 1950. Indeed a movement that clearly marks Peron as left wing :-)
Wait, so those who oppose market fundamentalism are not, in fact, "economically illiterate"? Who knew.
So it was going well until his party lost a local election
It wasn't a local election in the British sense, Buenos Aires province is huge, about half the size of France and about 40% of the national electorate live there. the election was for its legislature
Surely the correct answer is that the markets were calm while Milei was in charge, but when elections showed his reforms might be reversed they lost their composure?
Argentina is an economic basket case. Trump is throwing good money after bad….instead of spending it in the US. MAGA must be thrilled.
Has he actually spent anything?