Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews

@article{Peters2015GuidanceFC,
  title={Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews},
  author={Micah D.J. Peters and Christina Godfrey and Hanan Khalil and Patricia McInerney and Deborah Parker and C{\'a}ssia Baldini Soares},
  journal={International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare},
  year={2015},
  volume={13},
  pages={141–146},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8860037}
}
The methodology and guidance for the conduct of systematic scoping reviews outlined below was developed by members of the JoAnna Briggs Institute and members of five Joanna Briggs Collaborating Centres.
View on Wolters Kluwer
journals.lww.com
5,018 Citations
Highly Influential Citations
219
Background Citations
888
Methods Citations
1,172
Results Citations
17

5,018 Citations

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

The purpose of this article is to clearly describe the differences in indications between scoping reviews and systematic reviews and to provide guidance for when a scoping review is (and is not) appropriate.

Best practice guidance and reporting items for the development of scoping review protocols

Detailed guidance and a checklist for prospective authors to ensure that their protocols adequately inform both the conduct of the ensuing review and their readership is provided.

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews

The updated JBI guidance for scoping reviews includes additional guidance on several methodological issues, such as when a scoping review is (or is not) appropriate, and how to extract, analyze, and present results, and provides clarification for implications for practice and research.

Conducting Scoping Reviews: Practical Insights for Early Career Health Researchers

What a scoping review is, when to use a scoping review and the most recent guidelines for conducting such reviews are outlined and summarises the most recent guidelines for conducting such reviews are summarised.

Scoping reviews: reinforcing and advancing the methodology and application

The purpose of this paper is to provide readers with a concise source of information regarding the difference between scoped reviews and other review types, the reasons for undertaking scoping reviews, and an update on methodological guidance for the conduct and reporting of scoping Reviews.

A Concise, User-friendly Guide to Conducting and Reporting Scoping Reviews in Healthcare

The Joanna Briggs Institute published updated guidelines for the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews in 2020 and to ensure consistency and rigour, all scoping reviews should now be conducted using such guidelines.

PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation

A PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was needed to provide reporting guidance for this specific type of knowledge synthesis and was developed according to published guidance by the EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) Network for the development of reporting guidelines.

Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting

A structured approach to analysis and reporting of scoping reviews: the PAGER (Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence for practice and Research recommendations) framework is put forward.

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews

The number of scoping reviews conducted per year has steadily increased since 2012, and in particular, there is need for a guideline to standardize reporting.

Mastering the Art of Scoping Reviews: A Comprehensive Guide for Public Health and Allied Health Students

The paper highlights that scoping reviews address broader research questions and typically do not assess study quality, and serves as a comprehensive guide for public health and allied health students and researchers undertaking scoping reviews.
...

20 References

Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework

A framework for conducting a scoping study is outlined based on recent experiences of reviewing the literature on services for carers for people with mental health problems and it is suggested that a wider debate is called for about the role of the scoped study in relation to other types of literature reviews.

What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.

Scoping studies: advancing the methodology

Specific recommendations to clarify and enhance this methodology are outlined for each stage of the Arksey and O'Malley framework, to support the advancement, application and relevance of scoping studies in health research.

Asking the right questions: Scoping studies in the commissioning of research on the organisation and delivery of health services

The nature of the scoping studies that have been commissioned by the SDO Programme are described; the impact of and uses made of such studies are considered; definitions for the different elements that may constitute a scoping study are provided; and the lessons learnt are described.

A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.

Few review types possess prescribed and explicit methodologies and many fall short of being mutually exclusive, but this typology provides a valuable reference point for those commissioning, conducting, supporting or interpreting reviews, both within health information and the wider health care domain.

A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency

The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature.

Short Report How to do a Scoping Exercise: Continuity of Care

It is explained how the task of ‘scoping’ was interpreted, using some innovative methods, and some of the challenges and advantages of working in a multi-disciplinary team are discussed.

The JBI model of evidence-based healthcare.

A developmental framework of evidence-based practice is presented that builds and expands on the work of leaders in the field ofevidence-based healthcare; is contextualised; is inclusive of diverse forms of evidence; and incorporates understandings of knowledge transfer and utilisation.

Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. A guide to the literature search for a systematic review.

The major considerations surrounding search strategies are detailed and an example of a search using the PubMed platform is presented, to show nurses how to conduct a systematic review one step at a time.

Understanding and researching wellbeing: Its usage in different disciplines and potential for health research and health promotion

Although wellbeing may indeed be extremely useful as a unifying concept for all those involved in health improvement or health research, at present it is being used unreflectively, thus potentially masking differences.

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers