Carrier signal research:
New developments, field experience and commission have steered my research in this direction.
Inasfar as a runner's carrier signal can be interpreted as a wave, or more accurately a series of waves, then adjusting this wave proportionally (in terms of amplitude) would amplify its effect on the RSI of the object.
Current tests on amplifying a classified subject corroborate this hypothesis. However the logical application of this is restricted by the hardware. Increasing output puts a not-unforseen stress upon the system, increasing the risk of a burnout in the hardware/wetware interface. Current investigation as to signal boosters suggest that, once implanted, they should remove the danger of damage, as they would also keep the feedback within safe limits.
Owing to the unique nervous system of the test subject, should I wish to impliment this on other subjects, further research and beta testing would have to occur.
Additional:
The signal boosters show a marked increase in code density of the subject. No change in immediate physical properties however.
Related work on code shells will allow us to disguise surveillance devices by covering them with a layer of mimetic code, which takes the form of its immediate surroundings and masks it against detection, instead of the earlier signal dampers which simply made such devices appear smaller, or located elsewhere.
Additional work on code shells also provided another defensive measure, which allows the shedding of superficial layers of code when utilised by a suitably modified subject. The layer will soon disintegrate without the framework to support it. Combined with the phagocytic defense system, however, the code is stabilised by that of the attacking program, which it can surround and consume independently of its host.
Supplimentary:
I can't wait to try it.
Inasfar as a runner's carrier signal can be interpreted as a wave, or more accurately a series of waves, then adjusting this wave proportionally (in terms of amplitude) would amplify its effect on the RSI of the object.
Current tests on amplifying a classified subject corroborate this hypothesis. However the logical application of this is restricted by the hardware. Increasing output puts a not-unforseen stress upon the system, increasing the risk of a burnout in the hardware/wetware interface. Current investigation as to signal boosters suggest that, once implanted, they should remove the danger of damage, as they would also keep the feedback within safe limits.
Owing to the unique nervous system of the test subject, should I wish to impliment this on other subjects, further research and beta testing would have to occur.
Additional:
The signal boosters show a marked increase in code density of the subject. No change in immediate physical properties however.
Related work on code shells will allow us to disguise surveillance devices by covering them with a layer of mimetic code, which takes the form of its immediate surroundings and masks it against detection, instead of the earlier signal dampers which simply made such devices appear smaller, or located elsewhere.
Additional work on code shells also provided another defensive measure, which allows the shedding of superficial layers of code when utilised by a suitably modified subject. The layer will soon disintegrate without the framework to support it. Combined with the phagocytic defense system, however, the code is stabilised by that of the attacking program, which it can surround and consume independently of its host.
Supplimentary:
I can't wait to try it.