$ touch name
$ ln name othername
$ ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 2 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 name
-rw-r--r-- 2 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 othername
$ rm othername
$ ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 name
You're doing something seriously wrong if, by removing one hard link, you also remove the other. Using rm or rm -rf in this case does not matter, nor does it matter which name is removed:
$ ln name othername
$ ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 2 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 name
-rw-r--r-- 2 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 othername
$ rm -rf name
$ ls -l
total 0
-rw-r--r-- 1 kk wheel 0 Sep 10 09:29 othername
Removing a hard link just removes one of the names of the file. The only way I can see that rm -rf could remove both names is if you used it with a filename glob that matched both names, or if you deleted the directory that contained them both.