-9

I need to make the move from Windows to Linux.

I just need an OS that installs fast, has the same (or almost the same) feel and design as Windows (Xp, Vista, Win 7, or even Win98 doesn't really matter), is easily customizable and which doesn't need 10,000 upgrades and reinstalls in one year, like most of the distros I learned about seem to undergo (most of them seem to be upgraded once or twice per year).

Anyway, as I was saying I need a stable OS that will function flawlessly even after 10 or 20 years, without needing a single upgrade, update or re-install. I am not interested in learning to use terminals or lines of code, I am not interested in gazillions of packages in their collection of software and applications, I don't need dozens of games or trying hundreds of new, cool and shiny apps, or anything like that. I will stick to the same browser that I've been using since it came out (mozilla firefox), I will stick to the same 2-3 games I've been playing since I was a kid, I'll also stick to the same Winamp, Winace, and other stuff that I've been using since I got my first PC. So, a huge collection of apps and even games won't impress me to install the latest and coolest distro if it fails to offer the minimum (stability and security)

I also need my OS to be highly intuitive (to look as much as Windows, if possible), to be easily customizable (drag and drop, or "click here click there done" type of customization, not typing alien coding into terminals and modifying dozens of config files and whatnot).

I am not very interested in saving on CPU resources as this year I will be getting a new PC anyway, with a minimum of 8GB RAM, SDD instead of HDD, too and so on and so forth. So PC resources won't be a problem anymore for my new Linux install (even my current desktop is able to handle a heavy Linux distro) but I need something that works and works flawlessly out of the box. I installed Mint x64 Xfce about a week ago and wasted all my time reading everything on their forum and while the folks at Mint forum are very helpful I feel like I will never get where I want with Linux Mint. And after doing some even more research and reading in Google and on other related and on-topic websites I feel like the more I try to learn how a particular distro or desktop environment works the more minuses it has and the more distros and DEs I hear there are. Which becomes s confusing and so down letting that you just feel like sticking to Windows but I can't (I WON'T) get back to it as I have already invested all of my energy and capacity of understanding it into it and it still looks like a program built by techie wannabes....

The drivers for my hardware is another biggie for me. After one week of research and forum asking I can't make the sound card and my (already obsolete) Speedtouch ADSL modem connect to the internet through Linux Mint, which is why I am looking for another Linux option.

I can understand that it's almost impossible for any distro to contain drivers for all possible device types and models, so I won't insist on this aspect. But at least I need to be able to easily make the devices work properly.

Is there any chance at all that I ever find such an OS among all the Linux variations that exist on the market today? I am not interested in server based Linux, or commercial or enterprise or other BS like that. I just need a OS to function on my desktop, that's all. I don't think I ask for much

So anyway, is there someone who has possibly, thoroughly tried ALL of the distros and Wms/DEs out there (or at least the major ones, those listed on DW) that can offer an unbiased opinion on which Linux distro is the solution I am looking for?

10
  • 2
    "I also need my OS to be highly intuitive (to look as much as Windows, if possible)" Windows and Linux are different. Even if you get something close to that (automagic DE which allows you to do everything with the mouse), be sure to get acquainted with some of the major differences. The evolution of this question, which is also quite new, may be useful: unix.stackexchange.com/q/62708/14831 Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 11:26
  • 5
    Also, you sound like you really want Windows, just without these problems. Have you ever considered trying to fix the way you use windows? What did you do? Did you run everything as Administrator or execute random EXEs from the web or enable flash and javascript for all web sites? Because I don't think it's that common for Windows to get infected that easily... Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 11:28
  • 3
    Which version of Windows? You do clearly have an issue with windows here, you should fix that. It is not normal to get "connectivity and virus issues" just after installing windows, unless you have been doing something terribly wrong. Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 12:37
  • 2
    Once again, what version of Windows? Also, where did you install the codecs and drivers from? Did you check all the binaries for vlc and the like to be sure they were virus-free? Did you install a firewall, in case you did not install a version of Windows which already has a firewall (and I think that if it is this case, that's why you've got problems as soon as you install it). Also, where did you get drivers, up to date drivers? Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 13:13
  • 3
    I completely agree with @njsg. You don't seem interested in learning how to use Linux, you're just trying to escape the problems you found on Windows by looking for something that behaves like it minus the problems. That's not what Linux is, and honestly, you're going to get disappointed and start cursing the linux gods. My advice to you is to take the time to learn to solve your problems on Windows. Random disconnect from the internet could be a problem at the side of the ISP, slowing down and/or freezing could be caused by a hungry process. Learn to diagnose. Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 20:02

1 Answer 1

7

There are many things in your question which indicate that Linux probably won't suit you either.

So, here it goes. I need to make the move from Windows to Linux as I am too pissed off with the many system crashes, numerous and random internet disconnecting issues, trojans, rootkits and malware infections and whatnot, and all of these on a fresh new install of Windows on which I only installed the bare minimum (winamp, browser, antivirus, office, vlc, etc, etc).

No new downloads, no new apps installed, no anything and yet, system crash after system crash, virus infection after virus infection (and that's after scanning PC twice or three times with AVG, Malwarebytes, HitmanPRO, NOD32, Avast, Avira and whatnot).

If you are having these problems right out of the box, almost undoubtedly the problem is not Windows.

I just need an OS that installs fast, has the same (or almost the same) feel and design as Windows (Xp, Vista, Win 7, or even Win98 doesn't really matter), is easily customizable and which doesn't need 10,000 upgrades and reinstalls in one year, like most of the distros I learned about seem to undergo (most of them seem to be upgraded once or twice per year).

Most Linux distributions install fairly quickly, some processes are more involved than others. Most distributions try to cast a balance between having the latest versions of software and having a stable package ecology. Debian stable has infrequent updates, largely only for volatile or security reasons. Obviously that would mean that you do not get the latest versions of software, but that seems to be what you want.

Anyway, as I was saying I need a stable OS that will function flawlessly even after 10 or 20 years, without needing a single upgrade, update or re-install. I am not interested in learning to use terminals or lines of code, I am not interested in gazillions of packages in their collection of software and applications, I don't need dozens of games or trying hundreds of new, cool and shiny apps, or anything like that. I will stick to the same browser that I've been using since it came out (mozilla firefox), I will stick to the same 2-3 games I've been playing since I was a kid, I'll also stick to the same Winamp, Winace, and other stuff that I've been using since I got my first PC. So, a huge collection of apps and even games won't impress me to install the latest and coolest distro if it fails to offer the minimum (stability and security)

If you install a Linux distribution and don't upgrade it, it will probably continue working indefinitely assuming the hardware doesn't fail. However, you seem to have two contrasting ideals: in your last sentence you ask for "security", but you also ask to never update. As security is important to you you will obviously need to update to fix security issues as they emerge, but you also state that you never wish to update. If you're looking for a balance, again, probably Debian stable strikes it.

Aside from Firefox, it is possible that your games and Windows applications won't work in Linux (they almost certainly do not have native ports, and may or may not work in WINE).

I can understand that it's almost impossible for any distro to contain drivers for all possible device types and models, so I won't insist on this aspect. But at least I need to be able to easily make the devices work properly.

This is one area in which Debian may not satisfy you. Debian only packages free software in its main repositories, so your choices for hardware drivers will be limited to that out of the box. You can, however, enable non-free repositories and install any packages you may need after installation.

My recommendation would be to revise the way you're looking at this problem entirely. Windows doesn't suit your requirements because your requirements are in many ways conflicting, installing Linux doesn't make those contradictions any less so.

If you really want to try something, though, Debian stable ticks most of your boxes. It's a rolling release, so you shouldn't have to do anything too major in terms of upgrades. Worst case, you can only apply security upgrades and only do a major upgrade when your version becomes unsupported (or don't upgrade, and risk security issues).

16
  • 4
    Seriously. If all that happened with Windows, something must be wrong between the keyboard and the chair. It would be interesting to fix that first, because if the same strategy is applied to other systems, it may still lead to a similar outcome... Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 11:31
  • 1
    @user31261 Linux viruses and security exploits are real. The fundamental reason that they are uncommon is because a.) usually Linux users are more careful with their operating environment, and b.) Unix has a much more overt permissions system. Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 12:16
  • 1
    @user31261, you want to move to linux because of the widely held misconception that it is "virus free": most of this is due to the user behavior and to the saner defaults. The only issues with windows are the less than sane defaults and the component between keyboard and chair who may think it's nice to run every Flash applet out there as Administrator. If GNU/Linux was commonplace the day VBS.Loveletter was conceived, and many people used, say, Seamonkey Mail&News with some feature to run shell scripts by double clicking an attachment sent with the email, the result wouldn't be different... Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 13:00
  • 1
    Many systems are stable. The biggest threat to computer security and stability has always lied between the keyboard and the chair. No matter how many different OSes one uses, the user is still the same. Commented Jan 27, 2013 at 13:16
  • 2
    Windows NT is the current, active Windows family. Windows 2000 is Windows NT 5.0; Windows XP is Windows NT 5.1, Windows Vista is Windows NT 6.0; Windows 7 is Windows NT 6.1, and so on. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_NT Commented Jan 29, 2013 at 21:21

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.