I read here that chmod -R 777 / is a very bad idea, because it overwrites permissions on files and deactivates the setuid, setgid, and sticky bits.
However I was thinking that chmod -R ugo+rwx / would not overwrite the permissions but add them, if not there already present, and that it would be therefore much safer than the aforementioned command. It also doesn't turn off any of the special bits, if I'm not mistaken.
Am I right? Or are those commands basically the same and both would destroy my system?
I don't intend on doing it, just asking for general culture.
man chmod-Ron/, it is like the difference between “being hit by a small bullet that will just about kill you, and being hit by a bigger bullet.”: It will make your system less secure that a Microsoft's Windows OS.