Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

4
  • You haven't answered the second part - Is it possible (and how) to use shortcuts on filesystems without symlink support on linux? Commented Sep 17, 2013 at 6:17
  • I've edited my answer. Commented Sep 17, 2013 at 10:09
  • It is surely possible to implement “shortcuts” in an application, e.g. the shell. But symlinks are supported by the operating system, meaning no changes to any application have to be made to support symlinks. It's not at all related to having a GUI or not. To be able to compete with symlinks it would have to be implemented in the kernel (e.g. as a module) to be transparent to applications. But what problem would that solve that hasn't been solved already? Commented Sep 17, 2013 at 14:45
  • Erm, no. If transparent support for microsoft style links were implemented in Linux, the logic would sit in the filesystem code, not in the kernel. If you really need the capability then have a look at FUSE Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 22:32