Timeline for What handles notifications in a pure Openbox environment?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2015 at 5:43 | vote | accept | jcora | ||
| Oct 20, 2015 at 5:43 | comment | added | jcora | @TechZilla That's how SO's supposed to work, gj :D | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 1:22 | comment | added | J. M. Becker | Sorry, was year+ late :P, provided the hard info, hopefully it will help searchers. | |
| Oct 18, 2015 at 1:15 | answer | added | J. M. Becker | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 12, 2014 at 13:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/433595922111823873 | ||
| Jul 8, 2013 at 12:09 | comment | added | jcora | I'm planning to install Debian without a desktop environment. However, I have this fear that there are dozens of utilities and daemons that I should be running, that will simply not exist in Openbox. I don't want to end up with a system that is crippled in the background, so I'd like to gather information on what kind of aforementioned daemons I should actually be running... Got any advice maybe? | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 5:01 | answer | added | Raphael Ahrens | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 8, 2013 at 2:56 | comment | added | user15760 |
If you have Xfce installed and active, then what do you mean by "pure Openbox environment"? Xfce uses xfce4-notifyd-config for the notifications. But if one runs "pure" Openbox, I would not expect to see it.
|
|
| Jul 7, 2013 at 23:25 | history | asked | jcora | CC BY-SA 3.0 |