Timeline for Wireguard connection between two LANs with wireguard boxes behind routers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2022 at 3:05 | answer | added | JamesThomasMoon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Mar 17, 2021 at 14:04 | history | edited | nobody | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Nov 20, 2020 at 11:10 | vote | accept | nobody | ||
| Nov 20, 2020 at 10:09 | answer | added | nobody | timeline score: 5 | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 19:02 | comment | added | A.B | On the same topic the router with static route settings would instead send an ICMP redirect to the correct gateway (the NanoPi) to achieve the same goal, but it's less efficient. | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 18:55 | comment | added | A.B | the DHCP part is really a separate question not really about Unix/Linux if youre routers aren't running Unix/Linux (including a shell access). You can configure additional routes with DHCP option 121. See tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3442 . Standard home routers probably don't provide this. Clients (phone...) must also handle it. You might ponder switching the DHCP role to the NanoPis then (if they provide such package). | |
| Aug 1, 2020 at 1:07 | history | edited | muru |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 31, 2020 at 20:36 | history | edited | nobody | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 19 characters in body
|
| Jul 31, 2020 at 18:27 | history | asked | nobody | CC BY-SA 4.0 |