Skip to main content
Unix & Linux

Return to Answer

added 271 characters in body
Source Link
Hauke Laging
Hauke Laging
  • 94.5k
  • 21
  • 132
  • 185

The subnet 192.168.2.0 to 192.168.2.7 is 192.168.2.0/29 i.e. the netmask is 255.255.255.248, not 255.255.255.255. In 192.168.2.0/29 192.168.2.0 is the network address i.e. not a valid host address.

subnet routing

You have to find out whether your ISP is routing 192.168.2.0/29 to an IP outside that range (e.g. 192.168.1.25) or whether the uplink IP is within that network. If the subnet is routed then you do not need any IP from it on that interface.

The subnet 192.168.2.0 to 192.168.2.7 is 192.168.2.0/29 i.e. the netmask is 255.255.255.248, not 255.255.255.255. In 192.168.2.0/29 192.168.2.0 is the network address i.e. not a valid host address.

The subnet 192.168.2.0 to 192.168.2.7 is 192.168.2.0/29 i.e. the netmask is 255.255.255.248, not 255.255.255.255. In 192.168.2.0/29 192.168.2.0 is the network address i.e. not a valid host address.

subnet routing

You have to find out whether your ISP is routing 192.168.2.0/29 to an IP outside that range (e.g. 192.168.1.25) or whether the uplink IP is within that network. If the subnet is routed then you do not need any IP from it on that interface.

Source Link
Hauke Laging
Hauke Laging
  • 94.5k
  • 21
  • 132
  • 185

The subnet 192.168.2.0 to 192.168.2.7 is 192.168.2.0/29 i.e. the netmask is 255.255.255.248, not 255.255.255.255. In 192.168.2.0/29 192.168.2.0 is the network address i.e. not a valid host address.