Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • There is the RTC point of view, the system pov, and could even be the application pov....what do is necessary to do, what is needed and what exactly breaks? Could it pay out initializing the applications after getting the time if getting it on time is critical? What time resolution does the app need? And is there an RTC? Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 16:39
  • 1
    I used to have some apps running in an iOT, and they were quite happy even if the time via NTP got later in the game. Granted that after I bought an RTC for that, things were smoother, but it all depends on what you want to do and whether time is critical for the apllicational part. Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 16:45
  • 1
    There can be always the possibility of feeding an NTP daemon. As an example: unixwiz.net/techtips/raspberry-pi3-gps-time.html Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 16:59
  • There is an rtc but our hwclock implementation doesn't have the ability to write directly to it -- only to and from the system time from what I can tell. See my comment below on the usage options for our hwclock. Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 17:14
  • @jpsalm What is the use of writing directly to the RTC clock? It is only read at boot time. Nevertheless, it is not yet clear what you need to do and why. Commented Feb 26, 2019 at 18:21