Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

3
  • ntfs is tricky on some distributions. Fat32 does not support files larger than 2 GB - but Fat32 is supported on any Linux I know of. Commented Aug 8, 2012 at 20:09
  • If one is using linx for most part of their work, ntfs is a terrible choice to go for. the ntfs-3g driver is still not complete or perfectly stable. And r/w speeds are nowhere close to what other filesystems can provide. FAT on the other hand has the file size limit. exFat though is a good option to choose. Commented Aug 9, 2012 at 19:49
  • 100% would prefer Ext3/4 myself, but like I mentioned in my answer, if you are moving your disk around between platforms, you might want to consider the crappier MS alternatives for portability. Commented Aug 10, 2012 at 1:15