Timeline for Can I open the next unread message in mutt with a single key?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2017 at 10:25 | history | bounty awarded | thecarpy | ||
| Dec 24, 2017 at 19:40 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 22, 2017 at 0:54 | comment | added | Sparhawk | Thanks. I'm on vacation at the moment, but I'll test it when I get back. It looks promising. | |
| Dec 21, 2017 at 14:49 | comment | added | Arkadiusz Drabczyk |
@Sparhawk: see yet another edit. The macro I suggested automatically opens a new e-mail in the current mailbox if there is any before moving on to other maliboxes. I also suggested how to disable marking messages as O after leaving mutt.
|
|
| Dec 21, 2017 at 14:48 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 298 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 14:57 | comment | added | Arkadiusz Drabczyk |
@Sparhawk: see edit. That's an interesting question. Unluckily mutt is not fully scriptable and it's a shame.
|
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 14:56 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1246 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 3:09 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 73 characters in body; deleted 8 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 3:04 | comment | added | Sparhawk |
Thanks for the answer. A major problem with this approach is that it runs <next-unread-mailbox> regardless of whether there are unread messages in the current mailbox. In this case, it would switch to the other mailbox, and not open the next unread message in the current mailbox. Another problem (as per my question) is that <next-unread-mailbox> doesn't look for unread/new messages but unread mailboxes.
|
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 2:53 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 2:39 | history | edited | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 47 characters in body
|
| Dec 19, 2017 at 2:21 | history | answered | Arkadiusz Drabczyk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |