Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    This is much too broad a question and it was automatically flagged by the Stack Exchange software due to its shortness and content. Users processing the review queues won't see that it's actually a self-answered question - and may vote to close it. You should edit the question to include more specific details. Commented Oct 9, 2017 at 19:24
  • @AnthonyGeoghegan I've split my Q/A into two separate ones. Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 17:16
  • Splitting the question wasn’t useful and I'd suggest that you re-merge them. I was trying to say that reviewers of questions in the Close queue would not see the answer. Without knowing that it was self-answered, the question looked like a bad one and reviewers would be likely to vote to close it. I was suggesting that you include more specific details such as including i3wm in the body of the question, describe the tasks in more detail and say something like despite researching this, it wasn’t particularly obvious how to accomplish these tasks. For useful tips, see How to Ask and How to Answer. Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 18:58
  • 1
    In any case, I've voted to re-open this question. Commented Oct 10, 2017 at 19:00
  • 2
    This question seems fine to me. I don't see the reason it has to be expanded arbitrarily. It should be reopened in my opinion. Commented Dec 15, 2022 at 6:10