Your problem is that you are invoking sh and not bash for your script in the shebang line. The syntactical convention of <(command) is a bashism that does not exist when invoked via sh, which emulates the Bourne Shell (if /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash).

Your problem is that you are invoking sh and not bash for your script in the shebang line. The syntactical convention of <(command) is a bashism that does not exist when invoked via sh, which emulates the POSIX shell (if /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash).

Your problem is that you are invoking sh and not bash for your script in the shebang line. The syntactical convention of <(command) is a bashism that does not exist in the Bourne Shell.

Your problem is that you are invoking sh and not bash for your script in the shebang line. The syntactical convention of <(command) is a bashism that does not exist when invoked via sh, which emulates the Bourne Shell (if /bin/sh is a symlink to /bin/bash).