Timeline for Are Linux utilities smart when running piped commands?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2012 at 2:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/162723727790977024 | ||
| Jan 26, 2012 at 0:25 | answer | added | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 23:22 | history | edited | Gilles 'SO- stop being evil' | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:39 | vote | accept | DisgruntledGoat | ||
| Jan 25, 2012 at 20:39 | comment | added | DisgruntledGoat | @KeithThompson pardon my ignorance, I'm not big on terminology, wasn't sure whether to call it terminal, shell or command line. Feel free to suggest edits to my question :) | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 19:34 | comment | added | Keith Thompson | The terminal has nothing to do with it. Piped commands are managed by the shell. | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 15:31 | answer | added | psusi | timeline score: 30 | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 15:23 | answer | added | Peter.O | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 14:05 | answer | added | harish.venkat | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 25, 2012 at 13:25 | comment | added | Paul Tomblin |
That's why gnu grep has the -m argument.
|
|
| Jan 25, 2012 at 13:12 | history | asked | DisgruntledGoat | CC BY-SA 3.0 |