Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • I strongly recommend adding a fourth drive and using two mirrored pairs (similar to RAID-10). Less capacity overall, but much better performance. and easier to upgrade (when you upgrade a raid-z, you have to upgrade all drives in the vdev before you get any extra storage available. To upgrade a pool made of mirrored pairs, you can either upgrade just one mirrored pair at a time, OR add an extra mirrored pair of drives. technically you could also add a mirrored pair vdev to a pool that has a raidz vdev but performance will still suck) Commented May 1, 2016 at 10:42
  • FYI: btrfs.wiki.kernel.org and zfsonlinux.org Commented May 1, 2016 at 10:46
  • sorry, i got that second sentence wrong. a 3-drive RAID-Z (or RAID-5) would have the same capacity as a 4-drive pool of two mirrored pairs (or RAID-10). the mirrored pairs would be much faster for both reads and writes. with mirrored pairs, you also have the option of starting with two drives now, and adding two more later when you need the extra space. and then two more some time later again. Commented May 1, 2016 at 10:51
  • Interesting discussion here: reddit.com/r/linux/comments/32cu9w/zfs_vs_btrfs Commented May 1, 2016 at 17:58
  • 3
    BTRFS had some issues with the built in RAID5/ RAID6-code in 2016: phoronix.com/… -- might be fixed now. Note that BTRFS is younger than ZFS. Also, in a 2016 filesystem fuzzing, BTRFS died quite early: blog.fefe.de/?ts=a9f560e2 Commented Apr 13, 2017 at 15:25