Timeline for Restrictive "group" permissions but open "world" permissions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2017 at 18:30 | vote | accept | Mr. Llama | ||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:25 | answer | added | Stephen Kitt | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:24 | comment | added | Mr. Llama | (cont.) I'm assuming that world permissions work similarly, even if they're more lax than user or group. However, my final question regarding when it might be useful still stands. | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:24 | answer | added | thrig | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:20 | comment | added | Mr. Llama | I've managed to test same groups, but not different groups. In the case of same groups, it seems to go with the group octet, regardless of the world octet. I'm not at liberty to to change user groups on the servers I have access to, so I can't test how "world" octets apply. | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:32 | |||||
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:13 | comment | added | steve | Looks like you could quickly recreate this permissions configuration, what have you tried so far ? | |
| Apr 13, 2016 at 21:10 | history | asked | Mr. Llama | CC BY-SA 3.0 |