Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:36 history edited CommunityBot
replaced http://unix.stackexchange.com/ with https://unix.stackexchange.com/
Dec 21, 2015 at 9:44 vote accept Móż
Dec 18, 2015 at 17:44 answer added bsd timeline score: 4
Dec 17, 2015 at 21:22 history tweeted twitter.com/StackUnix/status/677599743636332545
Dec 17, 2015 at 14:30 comment added David King You may also want to consider Joliet (CDFS) or (I can't believe I'm saying this) FAT32. Both are pretty rudimentary filesystems that would waste space on silly things like journals :)
Dec 17, 2015 at 9:24 comment added bsd I don't believe that ext2 supports TRIM. If you do any moving or deleting, then you want a filesystem that supports the TRIM command.
Dec 17, 2015 at 8:32 comment added Criggie @UlrichSchwarz Correct, but its so awkward to change the inode allocation rate that you're best off leaving it as default for normal usage.
Dec 17, 2015 at 7:11 comment added Ulrich Schwarz Way back when, it was possible to influence the number of inodes in the filesystem (at mkfs time), with mostly big files, you have fewer files, so you need fewer inodes. But I can't see that making a big difference.
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:45 comment added muru A couple of journals I checked were 128 MB, so, I guess 1-2%?. You would be much better off freeing up reserved space in ext4.
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:42 comment added Móż @muru I'd be happy with even 1%. I've already cranked back the reserved space to zero, because it's not a system disk. I'm on "squeeze every last byte", because the effort of doing that is a once-off thing paid back by another few music tracks.
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:36 comment added Criggie Gidday and welcome to SE Unix & Linux. Excellent first question.
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:35 comment added muru How much do you hope to gain by losing the journal?
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:30 review First posts
Dec 17, 2015 at 7:19
Dec 17, 2015 at 6:28 history asked Móż CC BY-SA 3.0