Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

7
  • That's a pretty comprehensive answer +1 Commented Sep 6, 2015 at 22:44
  • 2
    Shell: In particular, Debian does not use bash, and since that greatly mitigated the Shellshock vulnerability on Debian systems, I cannot imagine it changing in the immediate future. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 4:32
  • 1
    Also, if you want to ship binaries, link them statically. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 6:58
  • Why is "instruction set" called a "bonus"? If you distribute in binary form, you really do need to consider which ISAs you'll be compiling for. You might not care for m68k users, but it's hard to ignore ARM, IA32 and X86_64 at least. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 12:33
  • 2
    This answer is unnecessarily pessimistic towards static linking. Static link is the answer, and in many cases it just works, AFAIK. Commented Sep 7, 2015 at 12:58