Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • I'm working with Harshal. We're only doing read from the host side, no writes. It works reliably, no corruption, and we can get about 8 MByte/sec data transfer rate. Making repeated unmount and mount calls is inefficient, so now the objective is to find a method with less overhead. Commented Feb 14, 2015 at 2:17
  • @JeffBrower, it doesn't matter if you're doing only reads, although of course the problem would be much more serious if you were also doing writes. It's just not something that a non-cluster filesystem can support except by sheer luck. I really encourage you to find another method of data transfer. Commented Feb 14, 2015 at 8:45