Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Nov 17, 2016 at 2:44 history edited Jeff Schaller CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jan 28, 2015 at 18:18 history edited Barmar CC BY-SA 3.0
code markup for the inline backticks
Jan 26, 2015 at 17:34 comment added Michael Ekstrand @MathematicalOrchid stackoverflow.com/questions/9405478/… seems pretty good. Backticks are very difficult to nest properly, especially when additional quotes are involved.
Jan 26, 2015 at 17:31 vote accept Michael Ekstrand
Jan 24, 2015 at 1:06 answer added Murray Jensen timeline score: 1
Jan 22, 2015 at 17:18 comment added Vi. Easier to type. `` - 2 keys presses; $() - shift+4,9, shift+0 - 5 key presses;
Jan 22, 2015 at 15:30 comment added Brian Knoblauch I didn't even know there was a replacement for backticks... Good info.
Jan 22, 2015 at 13:16 comment added MathematicalOrchid Wait, backticks are deprecated?? Does anybody have a canonical reference explaining why? (Weird syntax characters are very hard to search on.)
Jan 22, 2015 at 2:24 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/558087684066140160
Jan 21, 2015 at 22:32 answer added jaymmer - Reinstate Monica timeline score: 5
Jan 21, 2015 at 22:08 comment added goldilocks It's a Groucho Marx thing `;{)
Jan 21, 2015 at 21:31 answer added maxschlepzig timeline score: 18
Jan 21, 2015 at 21:26 comment added Stéphane Chazelas No, there's no point using or teaching `...`. It's there for backward portability with the Bourne shell only (like the Bourne shell had ^ (same as |) for backward portability with the Thomson shell). Note however that (t)csh don't have $(...) (but there's no much point using or teaching them either).
Jan 21, 2015 at 21:15 history asked Michael Ekstrand CC BY-SA 3.0