Skip to main content
improved the format
Source Link
Raphael Ahrens
  • 9.9k
  • 5
  • 39
  • 53

I am thinking on a system, where /etc/etc were tracked on a remote git repository. I am thinking on a git workflow, where every host machine where a different branch.

Every previous versions on every machine chouldcould be easily tracked, compared, merged.

If a /etc/etc modification had to be committed on many machines, it could be easily done by some merging script.

In case of an "unwanted" /etc/etc change, this could be good visible (even alarm scripts could be tuned to watch that).

Anybody used already a such configuration? Are there any security problems with it?

I am thinking on a system, where /etc were tracked on a remote git repository. I am thinking on a git workflow, where every host machine where a different branch.

Every previous versions on every machine chould be easily tracked, compared, merged.

If a /etc modification had to be committed on many machines, it could be easily done by some merging script.

In case of an "unwanted" /etc change, this could be good visible (even alarm scripts could be tuned to watch that).

Anybody used already a such configuration? Are there any security problems with it?

I am thinking on a system, where /etc were tracked on a remote git repository. I am thinking on a git workflow, where every host machine where a different branch.

Every previous versions on every machine could be easily tracked, compared, merged.

If a /etc modification had to be committed on many machines, it could be easily done by some merging script.

In case of an "unwanted" /etc change, this could be good visible (even alarm scripts could be tuned to watch that).

Anybody used already a such configuration? Are there any security problems with it?

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUnix/status/481841260270211072
Source Link
peterh
  • 10.5k
  • 18
  • 69
  • 99

Using git to manage /etc?

I am thinking on a system, where /etc were tracked on a remote git repository. I am thinking on a git workflow, where every host machine where a different branch.

Every previous versions on every machine chould be easily tracked, compared, merged.

If a /etc modification had to be committed on many machines, it could be easily done by some merging script.

In case of an "unwanted" /etc change, this could be good visible (even alarm scripts could be tuned to watch that).

Anybody used already a such configuration? Are there any security problems with it?