Return to Answer

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with a specialized keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. (See "mixed-initiative natural programming language") This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.
• Avatar-like assistants like Clippy or Eliza.

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with a specialized keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. (See "mixed-initiative natural programming language") This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.
• Avatar-like assistants like Clippy or Eliza.

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with a specialized keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. (See "mixed-initiative natural programming language") This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with a specialized keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. (See "mixed-initiative natural programming language") This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.
• Avatar-like assistants like Clippy or Eliza.

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with its own keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.

The only examples I could think of:

• Some professional video editing software comes with a specialized keyboard. This may not only increase usability (color-coded and labeled keys may help to be more efficient), but also identification (This is the computer I do video stuff with. It is my ally).
• There is a natural programming language that, instead of throwing compiler errors, resolves ambiguities by asking questions. (See "mixed-initiative natural programming language") This dialogue may foster interdependence: it is not the user that wrote the program, they worked together.