Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
JonW
  • 37.7k
  • 24
  • 126
  • 158
Refined question
Source Link
Benny Skogberg
  • 55.2k
  • 22
  • 146
  • 245

I often have to explain some aspect of an application, and often need to refer to users. I really don't like the term as it is not something with a good connotation (e.g. drug users) to the non-technical world.

What alternatives are there that you can suggestWhich word is a better, non-technical representation of a user?

I often have to explain some aspect of an application, and often need to refer to users. I really don't like the term as it is not something with a good connotation (e.g. drug users) to the non-technical world.

What alternatives are there that you can suggest?

I often have to explain some aspect of an application, and often need to refer to users. I really don't like the term as it is not something with a good connotation (e.g. drug users) to the non-technical world.

Which word is a better, non-technical representation of a user?

Post Closed as "not constructive" by Zelda
Question Protected by CommunityBot
Post Made Community Wiki by errordeveloper
Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackUX/status/114729204431597568
Post Merged (destination) from ux.stackexchange.com/questions/7604/…
Source Link
JohnGB
  • 68.7k
  • 26
  • 187
  • 297

Better term for "user"

I often have to explain some aspect of an application, and often need to refer to users. I really don't like the term as it is not something with a good connotation (e.g. drug users) to the non-technical world.

What alternatives are there that you can suggest?