1975

I would like to create a String.replaceAll() method in JavaScript and think using a regex would be the most terse way to do it. However, I can't figure out how to pass a variable into a regex. I can do this already which will replace all the instances of "B" with "A".

"ABABAB".replace(/B/g, "A");

But I want to do something like this:

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(replaceThis, withThis) {
    this.replace(/replaceThis/g, withThis);
};

But obviously, this will only replace the text "replaceThis"...so how do I pass this variable into my regex string?

2
  • 22
    Note that we're currently working on adding this functionality to JavaScript if you have an opinion about it please join the discussion. Commented Jun 23, 2015 at 11:38
  • 18
    const re = new RegExp(`${replaceThis}`, 'g'); str.replace(re, withThis); Commented Apr 7, 2022 at 12:19

29 Answers 29

2438

Instead of using the /\sREGEX\s/g syntax, you can construct a new RegExp object:

// variable == 'REGEX'
let re = new RegExp(String.raw`\s${variable}\s`, "g");

You can dynamically create regex objects this way. Then you will do:

"mystring1".replace(re, "newstring");

For older browser or node

// variable == 'REGEX'
var re = new RegExp("\\s" + variable + "\\s", "g");
"mystring1".replace(re, "newstring");
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

If you need to use an expression like /\/word\:\w*$/, be sure to escape your backslashes: new RegExp( '\\/word\\:\\w*$' ).
The question suggests that the RegEx is only used to do a constant string replacement. So this is answer is wrong as it would fail if the string contains RegEx meta characters. Sad it is voted this high, will make many headaches...
An example of this passing a variable would make this a good answer. I'm still struggling after reading this.
286

As Eric Wendelin mentioned, you can do something like this:

str1 = "pattern"
var re = new RegExp(str1, "g");
"pattern matching .".replace(re, "regex");

This yields "regex matching .". However, it will fail if str1 is ".". You'd expect the result to be "pattern matching regex", replacing the period with "regex", but it'll turn out to be...

regexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregexregex

This is because, although "." is a String, in the RegExp constructor it's still interpreted as a regular expression, meaning any non-line-break character, meaning every character in the string. For this purpose, the following function may be useful:

 RegExp.quote = function(str) {
     return str.replace(/([.?*+^$[\]\\(){}|-])/g, "\\$1");
 };

Then you can do:

str1 = "."
var re = new RegExp(RegExp.quote(str1), "g");
"pattern matching .".replace(re, "regex");

yielding "pattern matching regex".

10 Comments

You know that the first parameter to replace can be a normal string and don't have to be a regexp? str1 = "."; alert("pattern matching .".replace(str1, "string"));
@some: of course. That's because the above example is trivial. When you need to search for or replace a pattern combined with a regular string, do str.match(new RegExp("https?://" + RegExp.escape(myDomainName)), for instance. It's annoying that the escape function is not built in.
developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/JavaScript/Guide/… offers a similar function, but they exclude -, and include =!:/.
The correct term is "escape", not "quote". Just BTW.
Would /[^\w\s]/g be a safe alternative to /([.?*+^$[\]\\(){}|-])/g?
|
152

"ABABAB".replace(/B/g, "A");

As always: don't use regex unless you have to. For a simple string replace, the idiom is:

'ABABAB'.split('B').join('A')

Then you don't have to worry about the quoting issues mentioned in Gracenotes's answer.

10 Comments

And have you measured that this is faster than regex?
This seems preferable, especially when needing to match on special regex characters like '.'
Uhm... Doesn't split take a RegExp too; if so, wouldn't it cause the same problem ? Anyway... .split().join() may be slower on some platforms, because it's two operations, whereas .replace() is one operation and may be optimized.
@PacMan--: both split and replace can take either a string or a RegExp object. The problem that replace has that split doesn't is that when you use a string you only get a single replacement.
|
152

If you want to get all occurrences (g), be case insensitive (i), and use boundaries so that it isn't a word within another word (\\b):

re = new RegExp(`\\b${replaceThis}\\b`, 'gi');

let inputString = "I'm John, or johnny, but I prefer john.";
let replaceThis = "John";
let re = new RegExp(`\\b${replaceThis}\\b`, 'gi');
console.log(inputString.replace(re, "Jack"));

5 Comments

thank you! (afaict, yours is the only answer explicitly with Emacs/rx-style interpolation, via template strings.)
What about replaceAll? Would it work the same as replace with the global flag?
@cezar technically you could use replaceAll with the exact regex above (including global flag) - but it would have no benefit. You would get an error if you tried to use it without the global flag, see this.
hi i'm trying to use this but not working 'const regex = new RegExp(/(?=.{\\b${digits}\\b}).*/g);' whereas digits is a numeric variable I'm passing down as a parameter. If possible can u explain how can I fix this?
@joekevinrayan96 integers work fine when I test them with my current example. Please create a separate question with a minimal reproducible example.
43

This:

var txt=new RegExp(pattern,attributes);

is equivalent to this:

var txt=/pattern/attributes;

See http://www.w3schools.com/jsref/jsref_obj_regexp.asp.

1 Comment

yep, but in first example it uses pattern as variable, in 2nd as a string
41

For anyone looking to use a variable with the match method, this worked for me:

var alpha = 'fig';
'food fight'.match(alpha + 'ht')[0]; // fight

Comments

37
this.replace( new RegExp( replaceThis, 'g' ), withThis );

1 Comment

I like this answer as it doesn't create the extra (& pointless) variable.
25

You need to build the regular expression dynamically and for this you must use the new RegExp(string) constructor with escaping.

If using ECMAScript 2026 you can use RegExp.escape static method like so:

const subject = "[a-z][a-z][a-z]";
const valueToFind = "[a-z]";
const replaceWith = "[z-a]";
const result = subject
  .replace(new RegExp(RegExp.escape(valueToFind), "g"), replaceWith);
console.log(result);


If this method is unavailable, you may use $.ui.autocomplete.escapeRegex method from jQuery UI autocomplete widget:

It'll take a single string argument and escape all regex characters, making the result safe to pass to new RegExp().

If you are not using jQuery UI you can copy its definition from the source:

function escapeRegex( value ) {
    return value.replace( /[\-\[\]{}()*+?.,\\\^$|#\s]/g, "\\$&" );
}

Comments

10
String.prototype.replaceAll = function (replaceThis, withThis) {
   var re = new RegExp(replaceThis,"g"); 
   return this.replace(re, withThis);
};
var aa = "abab54..aba".replaceAll("\\.", "v");

Test with this tool

Comments

7
String.prototype.replaceAll = function(a, b) {
    return this.replace(new RegExp(a.replace(/([.?*+^$[\]\\(){}|-])/ig, "\\$1"), 'ig'), b)
}

Test it like:

var whatever = 'Some [b]random[/b] text in a [b]sentence.[/b]'

console.log(whatever.replaceAll("[", "<").replaceAll("]", ">"))

Comments

7

You can use a string as a regular expression. Don’t forget to use new RegExp.

Example:

var yourFunction = new RegExp(
        '^-?\\d+(?:\\.\\d{0,' + yourVar + '})?'
      )

Comments

5

To satisfy my need to insert a variable/alias/function into a Regular Expression, this is what I came up with:

oldre = /xx\(""\)/;
function newre(e){
    return RegExp(e.toString().replace(/\//g,"").replace(/xx/g, yy), "g")
};

String.prototype.replaceAll = this.replace(newre(oldre), "withThis");

where 'oldre' is the original regexp that I want to insert a variable, 'xx' is the placeholder for that variable/alias/function, and 'yy' is the actual variable name, alias, or function.

1 Comment

After trying every single solution for inserting a variable inside the regular expression, yours was the only one that worked for me. Thank you sooo much!
5

And the CoffeeScript version of Steven Penny's answer, since this is #2 Google result....even if CoffeeScript is just JavaScript with a lot of characters removed...;)

baz = "foo"
filter = new RegExp(baz + "d")
"food fight".match(filter)[0] // food

And in my particular case:

robot.name = hubot
filter = new RegExp(robot.name)
if msg.match.input.match(filter)
  console.log "True!"

2 Comments

why a downvote? coffeescript -IS- javascript with it's own specific syntax.
robot.name=hubot is not javascript.
4

Here's another replaceAll implementation:

    String.prototype.replaceAll = function (stringToFind, stringToReplace) {
        if ( stringToFind == stringToReplace) return this;
        var temp = this;
        var index = temp.indexOf(stringToFind);
        while (index != -1) {
            temp = temp.replace(stringToFind, stringToReplace);
            index = temp.indexOf(stringToFind);
        }
        return temp;
    };

Comments

4

You can use this if $1 does not work for you:

var pattern = new RegExp("amman", "i");
"abc Amman efg".replace(pattern, "<b>" + "abc Amman efg".match(pattern)[0] + "</b>");

Comments

3

While you can make dynamically-created RegExp's (as per the other responses to this question), I'll echo my comment from a similar post: The functional form of String.replace() is extremely useful and in many cases reduces the need for dynamically-created RegExp objects. (which are kind of a pain 'cause you have to express the input to the RegExp constructor as a string rather than use the slashes /[A-Z]+/ regexp literal format)

Comments

3

This self calling function will iterate over replacerItems using an index, and change replacerItems[index] globally on the string with each pass.

  const replacerItems = ["a", "b", "c"];    

    function replacer(str, index){
          const item = replacerItems[index];
          const regex = new RegExp(`[${item}]`, "g");
          const newStr = str.replace(regex, "z");
          if (index < replacerItems.length - 1) {
            return replacer(newStr, index + 1);
          }
          return newStr;
    }

// console.log(replacer('abcdefg', 0)) will output 'zzzdefg'

Comments

3

None of these answers were clear to me. I eventually found a good explanation at How to use a variable in replace function of JavaScript

The simple answer is:

var search_term = new RegExp(search_term, "g");
text = text.replace(search_term, replace_term);

For example:

$("button").click(function() {
  Find_and_replace("Lorem", "Chocolate");
  Find_and_replace("ipsum", "ice-cream");
});

function Find_and_replace(search_term, replace_term) {
  text = $("textbox").html();
  var search_term = new RegExp(search_term, "g");
  text = text.replace(search_term, replace_term);
  $("textbox").html(text);
}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script>
<textbox>
  Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum Lorem ipsum
</textbox>
<button>Click me</button>

1 Comment

You're overwriting a closure variable, no need to use var here. Also, if you pass \b or \1 it would break.
3

I found so many answers with weird examples in here and in other open tickets on stackoverflow or similar forums.

This is the simplest option in my opinion how u can put variable as template literal string;

const someString = "abc";
const regex = new RegExp(`^ someregex ${someString} someregex $`);

As u can see I'm not puting forward slash at the beginning or the end, the RegExp constructor will reconstruct the valid regex literal. Works with yup matches function also.

1 Comment

youre not using slash, but youre using a backtick? Maybe you can explain this.
2

You can always use indexOf repeatedly:

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(substring, replacement) {
    var result = '';
    var lastIndex = 0;

    while(true) {
        var index = this.indexOf(substring, lastIndex);
        if(index === -1) break;
        result += this.substring(lastIndex, index) + replacement;
        lastIndex = index + substring.length;
    }

    return result + this.substring(lastIndex);
};

This doesn’t go into an infinite loop when the replacement contains the match.

Comments

2

One way to implement is by taking the value from a text field which is the one you want to replace and another is the "replace with" text field, getting the value from text-field in a variable and setting the variable to RegExp function to further replace. In my case I am using jQuery, but you can also do it by only JavaScript too.

JavaScript code:

  var replace =document.getElementById("replace}"); // getting a value from a text field with I want to replace
  var replace_with = document.getElementById("with"); //Getting the value from another text fields with which I want to replace another string.

  var sRegExInput = new RegExp(replace, "g");
  $("body").children().each(function() {
    $(this).html($(this).html().replace(sRegExInput,replace_with));
  });

This code is on the Onclick event of a button, and you can put this in a function to call.

So now you can pass a variable in the replace function.

3 Comments

Your replace_with variable will contain the DOM element not the value itself
The link is broken: "Page not found - Mindfire Solutions. 404. Looks like you are lost."
Just ignor the link you can use the code given in the answer it should work accordingly
2

example: regex start with

function startWith(char, value) {
    return new RegExp(`^[${char}]`, 'gi').test(value);
}

Comments

2

Easy method:

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(replaceThis, withThis) {
    const regexp = new RegExp(`${replaceThis}`, 'g');
    this.replace(regexp, withThis);
};

Comments

1

In case anyone else was looking for this, here's how you keep the operators:

// BAD
let foo = "foo"
new RegExp(`${foo}\s`, "g");
// => /foos/g

// GOOD
let foo = "foo"
new RegExp(`${foo}${/\s/.source}`, "g");
// => /foo\s/g

Comments

0

For multiple replace without regular expressions I went with the following:

      let str = "I am a cat man. I like cats";
      let find = "cat";
      let replace = "dog";


      // Count how many occurrences there are of the string to find 
      // inside the str to be examined.
      let findCount = str.split(find).length - 1;

      let loopCount = 0;

      while (loopCount < findCount) 
      {
        str = str.replace(find, replace);
        loopCount = loopCount + 1;
      }  

      console.log(str);
      // I am a dog man. I like dogs

The important part of the solution was found here

Comments

0

If you pass the variable with the correct syntax, you can do this like so with the code below.

This has the added benefit of using the flags in the same variable.

Also you don't have to double escape \ in the regular expression when it comes to \w, etc.

var str = 'regexVariable example: This is my example of RegExp replacing with a regexVariable.'
var reVar = /(.*?)(regex\w+?iable)(.+?)/gi;
var resStr = str.replace(new RegExp(reVar), '$1 :) :) :) $2 :) :) :)$3');
console.log(resStr);

// Returns:
// :) :) :) regexVariable :) :) :) example: This is my example of RegExp replacing with a  :) :) :) regexVariable :) :) :).

The prototype version as per the OP's example:

var str = 'regexVariable prototype: This is my example of RegExp replacing with a regexVariable.'

String.prototype.regexVariable = function(reFind, reReplace) {
return str.replace(new RegExp(reFind), reReplace);
}

var reVar = /(.*?)(regex\w+?iable)(.+?)/gi;

console.log(str.regexVariable(reVar, '$1 :) :) :) $2 :) :) :)$3'));

// Returns:
// :) :) :) regexVariable :) :) :) prototype: This is my example of replacing with a  :) :) :) regexVariable :) :) :).

Comments

0

As a relative JavaScript novice, the accepted answer https://stackoverflow.com/a/494046/1904943 is noted / appreciated, but it is not very intuitive.

Here is a simpler interpretation, by example (using a simple JavaScript IDE).

myString = 'apple pie, banana loaf';

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/pie/gi, 'PIE'))
// apple PIE, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/\bpie\b/gi, 'PIE'))
// apple PIE, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/pi/gi, 'PIE'))
// apple PIEe, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/\bpi\b/gi, 'PIE'))
// [NO EFFECT] apple pie, banana loaf

const match_word = 'pie';

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/match_word/gi, '**PIE**'))
// [NO EFFECT] apple pie, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replaceAll(/\b`${bmatch_word}`\b/gi, '**PIE**'))
// [NO EFFECT] apple pie, banana loaf

// ----------------------------------------
// ... new RegExp(): be sure to \-escape your backslashes: \b >> \\b ...

const match_term = 'pie';
const match_re = new RegExp(`(\\b${match_term}\\b)`, 'gi')

console.log(myString.replaceAll(match_re, 'PiE'))
// apple PiE, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replace(match_re, '**PIE**'))
// apple **PIE**, banana loaf

console.log(myString.replaceAll(match_re, '**PIE**'))
// apple **PIE**, banana loaf

Application

E.g.: replacing (color highlighting) words in string / sentence, [optionally] if the search term matches a more than a user-defined proportion of the matched word.

Note: original character case of matched term is retained. hl: highlight; re: regex | regular expression

mySentence = "Apple, boOk? BOoks; booKEd. BookMark, 'BookmarkeD', bOOkmarks! bookmakinG, Banana; bE, BeEn, beFore."

function replacer(mySentence, hl_term, hl_re) {
    console.log('mySentence [raw]:', mySentence)
    console.log('hl_term:', hl_term, '| hl_term.length:', hl_term.length)
    cutoff = hl_term.length;
    console.log('cutoff:', cutoff)

    // `.match()` conveniently collects multiple matched items
    // (including partial matches) into an [array]
    const hl_terms  = mySentence.toLowerCase().match(hl_re, hl_term);
    if (hl_terms == null) {
        console.log('No matches to hl_term "' + hl_term + '"; echoing input string then exiting ...')
        return mySentence;
    }
    console.log('hl_terms:', hl_terms)
    for (let i = 0;  i < hl_terms.length; i++) {
        console.log('----------------------------------------')
        console.log('[' + i + ']:', hl_terms[i], '| length:', hl_terms[i].length, '| parseInt(0.7(length)):', parseInt(0.7*hl_terms[i].length))
        // TEST: if (hl_terms[i].length >= cutoff*10) {
        if (cutoff >= parseInt(0.7 * hl_terms[i].length)) {
            var match_term = hl_terms[i].toString();

            console.log('matched term:', match_term, '[cutoff length:', cutoff, '| 0.7(matched term length):', parseInt(0.7 * hl_terms[i].length))

            const match_re = new RegExp(`(\\b${match_term}\\b)`, 'gi')

            mySentence = mySentence.replaceAll(match_re, '<font style="background:#ffe74e">$1</font>');
        }
        else {
            var match_term = hl_terms[i].toString();
            console.log('NO match:', match_term, '[cutoff length:', cutoff, '| 0.7(matched term length):', parseInt(0.7 * hl_terms[i].length))
        }
    }
    return mySentence;
}

// TESTS:
// const hl_term = 'be';
// const hl_term = 'bee';
// const hl_term = 'before';
// const hl_term = 'book';
const hl_term = 'bookma';
// const hl_term = 'Leibniz';

// This regex matches from start of word:
const hl_re = new RegExp(`(\\b${hl_term}[A-z]*)\\b`, 'gi')

mySentence = replacer(mySentence, hl_term, hl_re);
console.log('mySentence [processed]:', mySentence)

Output

mySentence [raw]: Apple, boOk? BOoks; booKEd. BookMark, 'BookmarkeD',
bOOkmarks! bookmakinG, Banana; bE, BeEn, beFore.

hl_term: bookma | hl_term.length: 6
cutoff: 6
hl_terms: Array(4) [ "bookmark", "bookmarked", "bookmarks", "bookmaking" ]

----------------------------------------
[0]: bookmark | length: 8 | parseInt(0.7(length)): 5
matched term: bookmark [cutoff length: 6 | 0.7(matched term length): 5
----------------------------------------
[1]: bookmarked | length: 10 | parseInt(0.7(length)): 7
NO match: bookmarked [cutoff length: 6 | 0.7(matched term length): 7
----------------------------------------
[2]: bookmarks | length: 9 | parseInt(0.7(length)): 6
matched term: bookmarks [cutoff length: 6 | 0.7(matched term length): 6
----------------------------------------
[3]: bookmaking | length: 10 | parseInt(0.7(length)): 7
NO match: bookmaking [cutoff length: 6 | 0.7(matched term length): 7

mySentence [processed]: Apple, boOk? BOoks; booKEd.
<font style="background:#ffe74e">BookMark</font>, 'BookmarkeD',
<font style="background:#ffe74e">bOOkmarks</font>! bookmakinG,
Banana; bE, BeEn, beFore.

Comments

0

ECMAScript 2021 introduced replaceAll.

Previously, to replace all occurrences of a plain string in a target string, it was common to pass a regular expression (with g modifier) as argument to the replace method, as passing the string as-is would only replace the first occurrence of that string.

Since ECMAScript 2021, you don't need a regular expression anymore if the goal is to replace all occurrences of a plain string in a target string.

1 Comment

Somehow, replaceAll is slower than replace with g.
-1

All these answers seem extremely complicated, when there is a much simpler answer that still gets the job done using regex.

String.prototype.replaceAll = function(replaceThis, withThis) {
    const expr = `${replaceThis}`
    this.replace(new RegExp(expr, "g"), withThis);
};

Explanation

The RegExp constructor takes 2 arguments: the expression, and flags. By using a template string in the expression, we can pass in the variable into the class, and it will transform it to be /(value of the replaceThis variable)/g.

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.