Why would anyone use String.Format in C# and VB .NET as opposed to the concatenation operators (& in VB, and + in C#)?
What is the main difference? Why are everyone so interested in using String.Format? I am very curious.
I can see a number of reasons:
Readability
string s = string.Format("Hey, {0} it is the {1}st day of {2}. I feel {3}!", _name, _day, _month, _feeling);
vs:
string s = "Hey," + _name + " it is the " + _day + "st day of " + _month + ". I feel " + feeling + "!";
Format Specifiers (and this includes the fact you can write custom formatters)
string s = string.Format("Invoice number: {0:0000}", _invoiceNum);
vs:
string s = "Invoice Number = " + ("0000" + _invoiceNum).Substr(..... /*can't even be bothered to type it*/)
String Template Persistence
What if I want to store string templates in the database? With string formatting:
_id _translation
1 Welcome {0} to {1}. Today is {2}.
2 You have {0} products in your basket.
3 Thank-you for your order. Your {0} will arrive in {1} working days.
vs:
_id _translation
1 Welcome
2 to
3 . Today is
4 .
5 You have
6 products in your basket.
7 Someone
8 just shoot
9 the developer.
Someone just shoot the developer. ;-)String.Format is faster and uses less overhead. Using concat +/& has to rebuild the string each time which can be very bad in large string objects. The very definition of a string is that it should be defined once and reused many times.(Many books teach us to use concat as examples but never tell us about performance!!) Building string should use StringBuilder which is even faster than String.Format ! VERY GOOD ANSWER- Developers need to learn to write readable code and keep performance in mind too!string.Concat, and there will not be any intermediate strings created. Using a StringBuilder would in fact hurt performance, not help it, since Concat can create an internal buffer of exactly the right size from the start. A SB is used when you have some sort of loop or other control block such that the number of strings being concatted isn't known by the compiler at compile time.Besides being a bit easier to read and adding a few more operators, it's also beneficial if your application is internationalized. A lot of times the variables are numbers or key words which will be in a different order for different languages. By using String.Format, your code can remain unchanged while different strings will go into resource files. So, the code would end up being
String.Format(resource.GetString("MyResourceString"), str1, str2, str3);
While your resource strings end up being
English: "blah blah {0} blah blah {1} blah {2}"
Russian: "{0} blet blet blet {2} blet {1}"
Where Russian may have different rules on how things get addressed so the order is different or sentence structure is different.
First, I find
string s = String.Format(
"Your order {0} will be delivered on {1:yyyy-MM-dd}. Your total cost is {2:C}.",
orderNumber,
orderDeliveryDate,
orderCost
);
far easier to read, write and maintain than
string s = "Your order " +
orderNumber.ToString() +
" will be delivered on " +
orderDeliveryDate.ToString("yyyy-MM-dd") +
"." +
"Your total cost is " +
orderCost.ToString("C") +
".";
Look how much more maintainable the following is
string s = String.Format(
"Year = {0:yyyy}, Month = {0:MM}, Day = {0:dd}",
date
);
over the alternative where you'd have to repeat date three times.
Second, the format specifiers that String.Format provides give you great flexibility over the output of the string in a way that is easier to read, write and maintain than just using plain old concatenation. Additionally, it's easier to get culture concerns right with String.Format.
Third, when performance does matter, String.Format will outperform concatenation. Behind the scenes it uses a StringBuilder and avoids the Schlemiel the Painter problem.
+s in a line. They are compiled to a single string.Concat call.string.Concat outperforms String.Format (at least for a single short strings). However there are many many factor involved (which can make one more efficient than the other). In situations in which the execution time would matter much (repeating same operation countless times), the speed saved by using string.Concat will be negligible though."Your order " + orderNumber.ToString() is same as "Your order " + orderNumber+s, it's just a bit delayed. String.Concat only takes up to four arguments, so the way five or more strings are joined via +s is by concatting them in groups of up to four, and then concatting those strings, and so on.Several reasons:
String.Format() is very powerful. You can use simple format indicators (like fixed width, currency, character lengths, etc) right in the format string. You can even create your own format providers for things like expanding enums, mapping specific inputs to much more complicated outputs, or localization.String.Format() is often faster, as it uses a StringBuilder and an efficient state machine behind the scenes, whereas string concatenation in .Net is relatively slow. For small strings the difference is negligible, but it can be noticable as the size of the string and number of substituted values increases.String.Format() is actually more familiar to many programmers, especially those coming from backgrounds that use variants of the old C printf() function.Finally, don't forget StringBuilder.AppendFormat(). String.Format() actually uses this method behind the scenes*, and going to the StringBuilder directly can give you a kind of hybrid approach: explicitly use .Append() (analogous to concatenation) for some parts of a large string, and use .AppendFormat() in others.
* [edit] Original answer is now 8 years old, and I've since seen an indication this may have changed when string interpolation was added to .Net. However, I haven't gone back to the reference source to verify the change yet.
string.Format usually won't be faster than a few string concatenations, because the format string also needs to be parsed and copied.string.Format as compared to concatenation + ToString(): value types are boxed as described here: jeffbarnes.net/blog/post/2006/08/08/…. Nonetheless, string.Format is a very powerful and great tool and performance usually not the most important criteria.String.Format adds many options in addition to the concatenation operators, including the ability to specify the specific format of each item added into the string.
For details on what is possible, I'd recommend reading the section on MSDN titled Composite Formatting. It explains the advantage of String.Format (as well as xxx.WriteLine and other methods that support composite formatting) over normal concatenation operators.
There's interesting stuff on the performance aspects in this question
However I personally would still recommend string.Format unless performance is critical for readability reasons.
string.Format("{0}: {1}", key, value);
Is more readable than
key + ": " + value
For instance. Also provides a nice separation of concerns. Means you can have
string.Format(GetConfigValue("KeyValueFormat"), key, value);
And then changing your key value format from "{0}: {1}" to "{0} - {1}" becomes a config change rather than a code change.
string.Format also has a bunch of format provision built into it, integers, date formatting, etc.
One reason it is not preferable to write the string like 'string +"Value"+ string' is because of Localization. In cases where localization is occurring we want the localized string to be correctly formatted, which could be very different from the language being coded in.
For example we need to show the following error in different languages:
MessageBox.Show(String.Format(ErrorManager.GetError("PIDV001").Description, proposalvalue.ProposalSource)
where
'ErrorCollector.GetError("ERR001").ErrorDescription' returns a string like "Your ID {0} is not valid". This message must be localized in many languages. In that case we can't use + in C#. We need to follow string.format.
string.Formatis wrong.