56
char str[] = "beautiful earth";
memset(str, '*', 6);
printf("%s", str);

Output:
******ful earth

Like the above use of memset, can we initialize only a few integer array index values to 1 as given below?

int arr[15];
memset(arr, 1, 6);
5
  • 4
    possible duplicate of memset integer array? Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 3:52
  • 5
    Nope. memset() casts down to a byte and dupes it across the region. Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 3:53
  • 1
    You could always read the memset documentation to find out what it does. Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 5:51
  • 1
    @JoeFrambach The accepted answer to that question doesn't apply here. Commented Jun 25, 2013 at 5:53
  • Possible duplicate of Why does "memset(arr, -1, sizeof(arr)/sizeof(int))" not clear an integer array to -1? Commented Oct 13, 2019 at 17:50

10 Answers 10

92

No, you cannot use memset() like this. The manpage says (emphasis mine):

The memset() function fills the first n bytes of the memory area pointed to by s with the constant byte c.

Since an int is usually 4 bytes, this won't cut it.


If you (incorrectly!!) try to do this:

int arr[15];
memset(arr, 1, 6*sizeof(int));    //wrong!

then the first 6 ints in the array will actually be set to 0x01010101 = 16843009.

The only time it's ever really acceptable to write over a "blob" of data with non-byte datatype(s), is memset(thing, 0, sizeof(thing)); to "zero-out" the whole struture/array. This works because NULL, 0x00000000, 0.0, are all completely zeros.


The solution is to use a for loop and set it yourself:

int arr[15];
int i;

for (i=0; i<6; ++i)    // Set the first 6 elements in the array
    arr[i] = 1;        // to the value 1.
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

12 Comments

I would be more convinced by your claim memset did this if you start out by initializing the whole array to 0 (using int arr[15] = {0}) and then doing the memset(arr, 1, 8); And if you still have an array full of 0x01010101's after that, you have a buggy c runtime :-).
@MikeWoolf Right. My comment was directed to the OP. Certainly he is free to code whatever he wishes, but if he's hoping to somehow trick memset into initializing his array, it's going to end poorly.
@briankip The array decays to a pointer here. The & is optional in this case; memset(&arr, ...) would do the same thing.
@JonathonReinhart Dangerous wording ('& is optional'). Both variants work, as memset accepts void*, but pointer type is different: arr decays to int* whereas &arr gives a pointer of type int(*)[15]!
@Jacqueline P. If you think this answer is incorrect, the right thing to do is leave a comment, not suggest an edit. That way I can explain why your understanding isn't quite right.
|
28

Short answer, NO.

Long answer, memset sets bytes and works for characters because they are single bytes, but integers are not.

Comments

11

On Linux, OSX and other UNIX like operating systems where wchar_t is 32 bits and you can use wmemset() instead of memset().

#include<wchar.h>
...
int arr[15];
wmemset( arr, 1, 6 );

Note that wchar_t on MS-Windows is 16 bits so this trick may not work.

3 Comments

Why would you use this non-portable hack instead of a simple loop?
@AykhanHagverdili If they're not going to be compiling their code on Windows, why not use the simpler, cleaner, and likely faster option? Don't criticize people for giving information to someone asking for that information.
@TigerRos Because it relies on a non-portable hack and it's not meaningfully better than a for loop. And the cherry on top is that it violates the strict aliasing rule, so this is also undefined behavior.
5

The third argument of memset is byte size. So you should set total byte size of arr[15]

memset(arr, 1, sizeof(arr));

However probably, you should want to set value 1 to whole elements in arr. Then you've better to set in the loop.

for (i = 0; i < sizeof(arr)/sizeof(arr[0]); i++) {
    arr[i] = 1;
}

Because memset() set 1 in each bytes. So it's not your expected.

6 Comments

But in my system size of int is 4 bytes. So i tried memset(arr,1,8). But it is initializing the whole array with that 4 byte value instead of filling only first 8 bytes as per my third argument
You must not use constant value 8, you've better to use count of element size. for example n * sizeof(int).
When calling memset(arr, 1, 4), it become 0x01 0x01 0x01 0x01. But your expected is 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01. (This is depend on your CPU archtecture).
got it. thanks. I tried memset(arr,1,2*sizeof(int)); as you said but still it is initializing the whole array with same value.
As I wrote in above, you shouldn't use memset if you want to set value 1 each elements (not set 1 each bytes).
|
5

Since nobody mentioned it...

Although you cannot initialize the integers with value 1 using memset, you can initialize them with value -1 and simply change your logic to work with negative values instead.

For example, to initialize the first 6 numbers of your array with -1, you would do

memset(arr,-1,6*(sizeof int));

Furthermore, if you only need to do this initialization once, you can actually declare the array to start with values 1 from compile time.

int arr[15] = {1,1,1,1,1,1};

2 Comments

You're technically correct, but if I saw that in a code review, I would probably lose it.
This will only work on platforms using 2's-complement for representing negative numbers. Even though virtually every platform today is 2's -complement, this is still a hack.
3

Actually it is possible with memset_pattern4 which sets 4 bytes at a time.

memset_pattern4(your_array, your_number, sizeof(your_array));

1 Comment

it sets 4 bytes at a time, not 4 bits
2

No, you can't [portably] use memset for that purpose, unless the desired target value is 0. memset treats the target memory region as an array of bytes, not an array of ints.

A fairly popular hack for filling a memory region with a repetitive pattern is actually based on memcpy. It critically relies on the expectation that memcpy copies data in forward direction

int arr[15];

arr[0] = 1;
memcpy(&arr[1], &arr[0], sizeof arr - sizeof *arr);

This is, of course, a pretty ugly hack, since the behavior of standard memcpy is undefined when the source and destination memory regions overlap. You can write your own version of memcpy though, making sure it copies data in forward direction, and use in the above fashion. But it is not really worth it. Just use a simple cycle to set the elements of your array to the desired value.

1 Comment

memcpy copies multiple bytes in one iteration for optimization so I don't think this trick can actually work on strings larger than 8 chars at least
0

Memset sets values for data types having 1 byte but integers have 4 bytes or more , so it won't work and you'll get garbage values. It's mostly used when you are working with char and string types.

Comments

0

Ideally you can not use memset to set your arrary to all 1.
Because memset works on byte and set every byte to 1.

memset(hash, 1, cnt);

So once read, the value it will show 16843009 = 0x01010101 = 1000000010000000100000001
Not 0x00000001
But if your requiremnt is only for bool or binary value then we can set using C99 standard for C library

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdbool.h>        //Use C99 standard for C language which supports bool variables

int main()
{
    int i, cnt = 5;
    bool *hash = NULL;
    hash = malloc(cnt);

    memset(hash, 1, cnt);
    printf("Hello, World!\n");

    for(i=0; i<cnt; i++)
        printf("%d ", hash[i]);

    return 0;
}

Output:

Hello, World!
1 1 1 1 1

Comments

0

The following program shows that we can initialize the array using memset() with -1 and 0 only

#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>

void printArray(int arr[], int len)
{
        int i=0;
    for(i=0; i<len; i++)
    {
        printf("%d ", arr[i]);
    }
    puts("");
}

int main()
{
    int arrLen = 15;
    int totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized = 6;

    int arr[arrLen];
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    memset(arr, -1, totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized*sizeof(arr[0]));
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    memset(arr, 0, totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized*sizeof(arr[0]));
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    memset(arr, 1, totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized*sizeof(arr[0]));
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    memset(arr, 2, totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized*sizeof(arr[0]));
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    memset(arr, -2, totalNoOfElementsToBeInitialized*sizeof(arr[0]));
    printArray(arr, arrLen);
    return 0;
}

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.