36

Possible Duplicate:
Multiple Inheritance in C#

I have two classes Class A and Class B. These two classes cannot inherit each other. I am creating new class called Class C. Now, I want to implement the methods in class A and class B by inheriting. I am aware that multiple inheritance is not possible in C# but is there any other way to do this?

1

7 Answers 7

66

Multitiple inheritance is not possible in C#, however it can be simulated using interfaces, see Simulated Multiple Inheritance Pattern for C#.

The basic idea is to define an interface for the members on class B that you wish to access (call it IB), and then have C inherit from A and implement IB by internally storing an instance of B, for example:

class C : A, IB
{
    private B _b = new B();

    // IB members
    public void SomeMethod()
    {
        _b.SomeMethod();
    }
}

There are also a couple of other alternaitve patterns explained on that page.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

22

A common alternative to inheritance is delegation (also called composition): X "has a" Y rather than X "is a" Y. So if class A has functionality for dealing with Foos, class B has functionality for dealing with Bars, and you want both in class C, then you can do something like this:

public class A() {
  private FooManager fooManager = new FooManager(); // (or inject, if you have IoC)

  public void handleFoo(Foo foo) {
    fooManager.handleFoo(foo);
  }
}

public class B() {
  private BarManager barManager = new BarManager(); // (or inject, if you have IoC)

  public void handleBar(Bar bar) {
    barManager.handleBar(bar);
  }
}

public class C() {
  private FooManager fooManager = new FooManager(); // (or inject, if you have IoC)
  private BarManager barManager = new BarManager(); // (or inject, if you have IoC)

  // ... etc.
}

  

Comments

14

If you want to literally use the method code from A and B you can make your C class contain an instance of each. If you code against interfaces for A and B then your clients don't need to know you're giving them a C rather than an A or a B.

interface IA { void SomeMethodOnA(); }
interface IB { void SomeMethodOnB(); }
class A : IA { void SomeMethodOnA() { /* do something */ } }
class B : IB { void SomeMethodOnB() { /* do something */ } }
class C : IA, IB
{
    private IA a = new A();
    private IB b = new B();
    void SomeMethodOnA() { a.SomeMethodOnA(); }
    void SomeMethodOnB() { b.SomeMethodOnB(); }
}

Comments

9

Use composition:

class ClassC
{
    public ClassA A { get; set; }
    public ClassB B { get; set; }   

    public C (ClassA  a, ClassB  b)
    {
        this.A = a;
        this.B = b;
    }
}

Then you can call C.A.DoA(). You also can change the properties to an interface or abstract class, like public InterfaceA A or public AbstractClassA A.

Comments

6

Make two interfaces IA and IB:

public interface IA
{
    public void methodA(int value);
}

public interface IB
{
    public void methodB(int value);
}

Next make A implement IA and B implement IB.

public class A : IA
{
    public int fooA { get; set; }
    public void methodA(int value) { fooA = value; }
}

public class B : IB
{
    public int fooB { get; set; }
    public void methodB(int value) { fooB = value; }
}

Then implement your C class as follows:

public class C : IA, IB
{
    private A _a;
    private B _b;

    public C(A _a, B _b)
    {
        this._a = _a;
        this._b = _b;
    }

    public void methodA(int value) { _a.methodA(value); }
    public void methodB(int value) { _b.methodB(value); }
}

Generally this is a poor design overall because you can have both A and B implement a method with the same name and variable types such as foo(int bar) and you will need to decide how to implement it, or if you just call foo(bar) on both _a and _b. As suggested elsewhere you should consider a .A and .B properties instead of combining the two classes.

1 Comment

public is not a valid keyword for interface member definitions ;-)
3

You can define a base class for A and B where you can hold a common methods/properties/fields of those.

After implement C:Base.

Or in order to simulate multiple inheritance, define a common interface(s) and implement them in C

Hope this helps.

2 Comments

If i use interface then I need to define the methods in Class C. Is there any other way where I can directly call the methods?
@Virus: you don't need to define all methods, but only those you want to share between different types.
-6

Do you mean you want Class C to be the base class for A & B in that case.

public abstract class C
{
    public abstract void Method1();

    public abstract void Method2();
}

public class A : C
{
    public override void Method1()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }

    public override void Method2()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}


public class B : C
{
    public override void Method1()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }

    public override void Method2()
    {
        throw new NotImplementedException();
    }
}

1 Comment

This is not an answer to the question

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.