Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

1

This solution is simple and valid! But: 1. While being similar to template method - it provides no quick IDE hints about underlying type. 2. Hint render namespace resolutions for both typenames which makes it even less readable. 3. Being splitted in 2 aliases. 4. Less generic than template method. Thank you!

int main
– int main

2025-02-13 15:50:22 +00:00
Commented Feb 13 at 15:50
@intmain If you name the type properly, you don't need to see the underlying type. This technique is valuable because it applies to many situations where building up a type by steps is more understandable.

Rud48
– Rud48

2025-02-13 18:08:20 +00:00
Commented Feb 13 at 18:08
@Rud48, sure every solution has its pros and cons. Just listed noticeable traits of this particular one, so it will be easier for future me and others to pick their most suitable solution.

int main
– int main

2025-02-13 18:55:59 +00:00
Commented Feb 13 at 18:55

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow