Skip to main content

Return to Answer

Active reading [<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Boolean#Noun>].
Source Link
Peter Mortensen
Peter Mortensen
  • 31.4k
  • 22
  • 110
  • 134

I suspect this is a leftover from C++ where people override the !! operator, but not the boolbool operator.

So to get a negative  (or positive) answer in that case, you would first need to use the !! operator to get a booleanBoolean, but if you wanted to check the positive case you would use !!!!.

I suspect this is a leftover from C++ where people override the ! operator but not the bool operator.

So to get a negative(or positive) answer in that case you would first need to use the ! operator to get a boolean, but if you wanted to check the positive case would use !!.

I suspect this is a leftover from C++ where people override the ! operator, but not the bool operator.

So to get a negative  (or positive) answer in that case, you would first need to use the ! operator to get a Boolean, but if you wanted to check the positive case you would use !!.

Source Link
Darren Clark
Darren Clark
  • 3k
  • 21
  • 15

I suspect this is a leftover from C++ where people override the ! operator but not the bool operator.

So to get a negative(or positive) answer in that case you would first need to use the ! operator to get a boolean, but if you wanted to check the positive case would use !!.