Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • @RoryMcCrossan his random number logic is perfectly fine, yours is wrong. For the limits 5 to 10 your code would actually generate numbers from 5 <= n <= 14 Commented May 29, 2019 at 13:06
  • Indeed, my mistake. This is still a duplicate, however. Commented May 29, 2019 at 13:06