Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

8
  • 7
    Well, you could pass the non-specific Delegate, but DynamicInvoke is sloooooowwwwww (relatively speaking) Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 15:00
  • 5
    Just out of curiosity, how would this be more useful than calling the method directly? I must say I'm intrigued though Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 15:00
  • 1
    Out of curiousity, what's the point of this? It seems very error prone. Why not just run the method? Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 15:01
  • This may be what you want: stackoverflow.com/questions/325156/… Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 15:02
  • 1
    @TheOddler Take a look at monotorrent.blogspot.pt/2009/12/…, you might be able to use Expressions to do what you're after. Commented Aug 20, 2013 at 15:15