Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

7
  • Easy to program but may not scale very well. If there aren't too many records ever, this should work fine. Commented Jul 23, 2013 at 15:23
  • 2
    @MichaelTodd true, but I beleive TRUNCATE/Bulk copy combination should hold well for hundreds of thousands of records. But it shouldn't even come to this since OP keeps all data in in-memory DataTable and (hopefully) that shouldn't be much. Commented Jul 23, 2013 at 15:30
  • 2
    That is a very inelegant, brute forcing solution. Commented Jul 23, 2013 at 15:43
  • @YuriyGalanter Heh. +1 for your pragmatism. Commented Jul 23, 2013 at 18:25
  • @MichaelTodd - The maximum entries is about 1500..Will this solution a go :) Commented Jul 24, 2013 at 6:38