Edit - Stack Overflow

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

I have to agree, using reflection to bypass the normal language methods cannot lead to a happy outcome. Reflection should always be limited to meta-language work. For example, its appropriate in an ORM to map objects to tables, or in a serialization implementation like a JSON converter. But using it for business-model work is the road to tears.

SAJ14SAJ
– SAJ14SAJ

2012-11-23 01:25:02 +00:00
Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 1:25
Yes! It make only sense for special purpose.

AlexWien
– AlexWien

2012-11-23 01:27:08 +00:00
Commented Nov 23, 2012 at 1:27

Add a comment |

Correct minor typos or mistakes
Clarify meaning without changing it
Add related resources or links
Always respect the author’s intent
Don’t use edits to reply to the author

create code fences with backticks ` or tildes ~
```
like so
```
add language identifier to highlight code
```python
def function(foo):
print(foo)
```
put returns between paragraphs
for linebreak add 2 spaces at end
_italic_ or **bold**
indent code by 4 spaces
backtick escapes `like _so_`
quote by placing > at start of line
to make links (use https whenever possible)

<https://example.com>

[example](https://example.com)

<a href="https://example.com">example</a>

formatting help »
answering help »

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow