Timeline for Query Rule Question - How to drop unmatched SearchTerms not present in Result Source
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2017 at 19:30 | comment | added | osozoso | Double Dang!!. Can I do: {actionTerm} -{subjectTerms} instead? If this article is correct, it looks as if any word/phrase that is not defined as an {actionTerm} becomes a {subjectTerm} in a query. See: sharepointfordeveloper.blogspot.com/2014/01/… | |
| Mar 21, 2017 at 11:47 | comment | added | Matthew McDermott | That's what the Action Terms query rule does. The matched terms become the ActionTerms. If you perform a query with `-{searchTerms} it will eliminate results that contain the searchTerms. I don't think this is what you want. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 17:25 | comment | added | osozoso | thanks @Matthew for again helping me with my query rule issues. I am trying to find a solution that won't need an explicit declaration in advance though. For the above query I was hoping that the searchTerms would be subtracted from the searchboxquery, but I guess that isn't how to make this happen. | |
| Mar 20, 2017 at 17:21 | comment | added | osozoso | Dang. I was hoping for a way to write a query along the lines of: {searchboxquery} -{searchTerms} | |
| Mar 16, 2017 at 12:33 | history | answered | Matthew McDermott | CC BY-SA 3.0 |