Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • Based on your edit, I understand the goal here is to establish a secure connection between user and server with knowledge of a password alone, even if all common security measures like using TLS fail or are unreliable. If this is correct, then you indeed want a PAKE like OPAQUE. This provides a mutually authenticated secure connection over an insecure channel, so both the client and the server know they're talking to the right party, and nobody can do a MiTM attack. Commented Feb 13 at 14:45
  • "Eliminate (il)legitimate MITM interception of web traffic snooping." - How does your approach achieve this? The MITM can just intercept the private key you're sending over the line (and maybe change the page to snoop the password the user enters). Commented Feb 13 at 15:00
  • @marcelm: Right, the password cannot simply be entered on the (potentially manipulated) target page. But a browser extension which implements the PAKE outside of the page could fix this. Commented Feb 13 at 15:08