Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

3
  • Thanks - any thoughts on reasons besides maintainability? Could you point out some programming standards / approaches it violates? @DeadMG ? Commented Jul 30, 2011 at 23:56
  • I pretty much pointed out all there is to say. This style is unacceptable for the reasons I mentioned. And those are some very good reasons. I know it's hard to communicate them to inexperienced developers. Bad reusability, testability, maintainability, dependence on globals...that's probably the worst you can say about code at all. Commented Jul 31, 2011 at 10:08
  • 1
    @matt74tm: Just imagine you wanted stateful URLs with this code ... Commented Jul 31, 2011 at 20:57