Timeline for Why is every programming language "powerful"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2011 at 4:48 | comment | added | Mark Canlas | How about BASIC? | |
| May 11, 2011 at 14:14 | vote | accept | Adam Arold | ||
| May 11, 2011 at 14:13 | comment | added | temptar | I do see your point. I think perhaps you don't see mine. The simple fact is attributes perceived as negative are never used. Ever. The opposite attribute is always used. | |
| May 11, 2011 at 14:11 | comment | added | Adam Arold | Ok, I see the point in your second paragraph. "if the next new language comes along does not describe itself as powerful, it will have an immediate disadvantage against previously existing competitors". So if a language misses this "feature" it is a disadvantage. You don't see my point though...I wasn't talking about weakness, I was talking about "powerful". | |
| May 11, 2011 at 14:11 | vote | accept | Adam Arold | ||
| May 11, 2011 at 14:14 | |||||
| May 11, 2011 at 14:09 | history | answered | temptar | CC BY-SA 3.0 |