Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • I can understand mathematical functions better than the weird synatx of haskell and others. Do you have any link that relates math steps to syntax of any functional language. Commented Jan 25, 2015 at 7:35
  • This answer is precise. FP will start making perfect sense once you realize (and internalize) that you are writing mathematical functions and not step-by-step procedures. Most people learn procedural programming first and that baggage is massive. I think "functions" in procedural languages should be called "procedures". Commented Feb 6, 2019 at 22:31