Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

10
  • 2
    You should seriously read about JIT compilation, and look at some benchmarks where Java is put against C++ Commented Mar 6, 2011 at 13:52
  • 1
    Who the heck voted this answer down? This whole question is becoming incredibly ridiculous! Good grief. Commented Mar 6, 2011 at 15:48
  • 8
    @Joe The answer is wrong. Java isn’t interpreted. Commented Mar 6, 2011 at 17:00
  • 3
    @Anto Forget those silly benchmarks. C++ is orders of magnitude faster than Java where it counts, see programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/29109/29136#29136 and programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/368/13888#13888. Commented Mar 6, 2011 at 17:02
  • 1
    @Konrad As far as I can tell you are only offering a single conunter example based on sort - how is that better than "silly benchmarks"? Commented Nov 28, 2011 at 15:19