Timeline for What should replace intra-file license headers in source files in judrisdictions which necessitate it?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10 at 21:48 | vote | accept | RokeJulianLockhart | ||
| Apr 10 at 21:46 | vote | accept | RokeJulianLockhart | ||
| Apr 10 at 21:48 | |||||
| Apr 10 at 20:34 | comment | added | candied_orange | @GregBurghardt is there an echo in here? | |
| Apr 10 at 20:17 | comment | added | Greg Burghardt | Fair enough, @candied_orange. Just beware that we can provide technical workarounds, but we cannot attest to their legal efficacy -- for that you need a lawyer. It might technically work but you still run a very real risk of being sued, and pointing to a Q&A on the internet between you and a bunch of strangers won't hold up in court. Honestly, that goes for the law and open source stacks as well. | |
| Apr 10 at 20:09 | comment | added | candied_orange | I’m allowing this question to stand because it’s about dealing with a technical limitation. But keep in mind, we aren’t the legal experts. You’ll need to ask a lawyer. You’ll find our licensing experts at our sister site Open Source. | |
| Apr 10 at 18:56 | answer | added | Ewan | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 10 at 17:26 | comment | added | Greg Burghardt | I don't think we can transfer the question. We have an explicit close reason for questions asking for legal advice. | |
| Apr 10 at 17:03 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 16 at 3:01 | |||||
| Apr 10 at 16:36 | history | asked | RokeJulianLockhart | CC BY-SA 4.0 |