Timeline for Optional data in the constructor, bad practice?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2024 at 6:20 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 26 at 8:48 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2024 at 16:15 | comment | added | Basilevs | > that dismisses the arguments for changing the implementation that otherwise could be changed just when there are changes in the use cases to support that a different formal approach is a plainer solution for. Could you rephrase? I fail to parse the grammar. | |
| Sep 7, 2024 at 15:45 | review | Late answers | |||
| Sep 7, 2024 at 21:39 | |||||
| Sep 7, 2024 at 15:31 | history | edited | user452375 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
syntax improvement
|
| S Sep 7, 2024 at 15:29 | review | First answers | |||
| Sep 7, 2024 at 21:40 | |||||
| S Sep 7, 2024 at 15:29 | history | answered | user452375 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |