Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • Thanks! In this case, it would be the test environment that would change. For example, I want to make sure traffic passes appropriately with a single switch as well as with a larger network that includes multiple devices, routing protocols, etc. So it may be a different "feature" (i.e. routing protocol) I'm testing, but I would still want to run the same test. Does that make sense? Is that a case of refactoring? Most examples I see with BDD are very simple straightforward tests. It makes sense it would be reusable in the way I am describing, but I can't find examples, which is throwing me off. Commented Feb 25, 2024 at 1:31
  • It’s a refactoring if the behavior being tested and the API it’s tested through is the same. How it works inside doesn’t matter to the test. Only that it works. Commented Feb 25, 2024 at 1:41