Timeline for Most relevant objectively-quantifiable reason to choose to use an object method vs. a function that just accepts the object as a parameter? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2023 at 19:15 | comment | added | Steve | @Caleth, I think that was just nonsense retrofitted into the real question. | |
| Mar 22, 2023 at 15:46 | comment | added | Caleth | @Steve sometimes there aren't "objectively-quantifiable reason[s]", just opinion-based ones | |
| Mar 22, 2023 at 7:42 | comment | added | Steve | I don't see why one of the fundamental features of OO languages, must be "opinion-based" or "unfocussed". There must be design rationale, including from the language designers themselves. | |
| Mar 22, 2023 at 5:34 | comment | added | CPlus♦ | Would it make logical sense for the function to require access to an object of a class? If so, method. Otherwise, standalone function. | |
| S Mar 22, 2023 at 2:47 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Apr 21, 2023 at 2:50 | |||||
| S Mar 22, 2023 at 2:47 | history | edited | MikeSchinkel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Editing after being closed for being unfocused.
Added to review
|
| Mar 20, 2023 at 21:57 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Mar 22, 2023 at 2:36 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:49 | comment | added | Stack Exchange Broke The Law | i voted to close because "opinion-based", not "needs more focus | |
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:49 | history | closed |
Jörg W Mittag gnat Stack Exchange Broke The Law |
Needs more focus | |
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:35 | answer | added | sfiss | timeline score: 4 | |
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:17 | review | Close votes | |||
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:49 | |||||
| Mar 20, 2023 at 20:12 | comment | added | bdsl | I feel like this will be quite language specific. | |
| Mar 20, 2023 at 19:49 | history | asked | MikeSchinkel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |