Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

5
  • 2
    If a hacker changes the data, they will also change the checksum to match; this will happen automatically, as the hacker will simply use the file system to make the change. Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 1:52
  • 1
    I can see that I should probably have reasoned some more before using that as an example :p however, my question still remains and now I am even further away from an answer :/ Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 2:02
  • Every hash function out there can spot some errors, and not others. Choose the one most likely to spot the kinds of errors expected for a given device operating in a given environment. Space is a different beast to terrestrial to hard drive to solid state. As for cryptographically secure this has no mean from a security perspective, they might trip up novices who physically extract the drive but that is about it. Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 3:04
  • Note that, if I am not mistaken, the latter two were specifically introduced as a very first step of supporting encryption. It shouldn't be too surprising that you need cryptographically secure hashes for encryption schemes. Commented Dec 1, 2020 at 6:54
  • @JörgWMittag, I will investigate what you say about supporting encryption further, thank you. I read that a strong checksum would be preferred for deduplication, but I do not know enough about that to have an opinion. Commented Dec 2, 2020 at 3:15