Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

2
  • 1
    Good, I like this answer it contains just the right amount of analogy as to convince me. Your rephrasing of the question is the/a correct one. Commented Jun 12, 2020 at 18:56
  • As a side note, in some paradigms, what you refer to as symbolic and conceptual levels of polymorphism are inherently bound to one another (think duck typing, in which methods or selectors, if you will, become effectively context-free) Commented Jun 13, 2020 at 13:35